Search Results

1. [2020] NZSSAA 7 (30 April 2020) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...statutory scheme, as opposed to the way in which the sections should be interpreted. Any change in policy is for Parliament. The points raised by Ms Hennessy cannot be remedied by a decision of this Court. [19] Ms Hennessy took her case to the Human Rights Review Tribunal which issued a declaration that s 71A and its equivalent provision in s 198 of the 2018 Act are inconsistent with the right to freedom from discrimination affirmed by s 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 199...

2. Muir v Zhou (Strike Out) [2022] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...September 2019. Ms Muir alleges that Mr Zhou breached Information Privacy Principles 1, 2, 3 and 4 in secretly looking at, or recording, Ms Muir and her friends. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Muir v Zhou (Strike Out) [2022] NZHRRT 49.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 49 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] While the statement of claim was served on Mr Zhou, he has never participated in any aspect of this claim. [3] Likewise, Ms Muir is now not taki...

3. Smith v Genesis Energy Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...his personal information without his authorisation, in breach of Information Privacy Principles (IPPs) 6 and 11 of the Privacy Act 2020. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Smith v Genesis Energy Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 24] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 24 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Frank Energy deny Mr Smith’s claim and raise jurisdictional issues. [3] Since filing his statement of claim, Mr Smith has failed to engage with the Trib...

4. [2006] NZEmpC AC 72/06 Williams v Kimberleys Fashions Ltd [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...further held that she was not suspended from her employment. The requirement of the employer that Ms Williams was to wear facial makeup was regarded as not being in breach of the relationship of trust and confidence nor was it contrary to her human rights. The raising of the issue of the appearance of Ms Williams at the end of a disciplinary meeting was regarded by the Authority Member as not being the most sensitive conduct by the employer. However, that was not held to be repud...

5. BASS results dashboard - Ministry of Justice 2016 [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...expenditure RAG rating Nominal expenditure Large Agency cohort median Variance from cohort median Efficiency metrics RAG rating Variance from cohort median Function Corporate & Executive Services Corporate & Executive Services Metric Human Resources Finance Effectiveness metrics Value change Percentage change Agency cohort median RAG rating Agency result ICT Procurement Variance from cohort median Operational context Metric Human Resources Finance ICT Procur...

6. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...Neither Legacy Church or Legacy Housing have responded to Ms Boyd’s claim nor have they participated in any way in this matter. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 2 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Ms Boyd has however failed to progress her claim. Given this, the Tribunal must determine whether the claim has become an abuse of process and should be st...

7. Appeal against Access Direction (s105) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ..._______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this appeal. Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against access direction (under the Privacy Act 2020) Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued an access direction against the...

8. Appeal against access direction - reply (s105) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...Surname Phone/mobile number _______________________________________________________________________ Preferred contact option for this reply. Please choose one and give the details. Email Postal address THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against access direction - Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a respondent in an appeal against an access direction under section 105 of the Privacy Act 2020 and you wish to fil

9. BORA Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Amendment Bill (No 6) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...ISSUES OF INCONSISTENCY WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT Section 19 – the right to be free from discrimination 6. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993. These grounds include age, which means any age commencing with the age of 16 years. 7. In our view, taking into account the various domestic and overseas judicial pronouncements as to the meaning of discrimination, the k...

10. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...of paper. If you are using a representative (a lawyer or an authorised person acting on your behalf), please give their details too. If your representative is not a lawyer, you need to give him or her the authority to act on your behalf. THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Enforcement of access direction Before you continue Please tick to confirm the following: The Privacy Commissioner has issued an access direction against the agency. The agency has not complied with the access di...