Search Results

1. E81 Karen Wilson (Engagement) - EIC - Te Ākitai Waiohua [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...provided for.”14 Given that Panuku were aware of our concerns around the identification of cultural values in the initial applications, we would have expected that Panuku use the drafting of a new resource consent application and Assessment of Environmental Effects (“AEE”) as an opportunity to remedy the poor assessment of cultural effects contained in the initial applications. 56. Not only did we specifically request to be engaged with about the Application, we made it very...

2. Houlbrooke (2011) Categorising the environmental risk from land application of liquid wastes based on soil properties [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   Categorising the environmental risk from land application of liquid wastes based on soil properties. Prepared for Marlborough District Council June 2011 Categorising the environmental risk from land application of liquid wastes based on soil properties. Prepared for Marlborough District Council June 2011 D Houlbrooke1, S Laurenson2, S Carrick3 1 AgResearch, Hamilton 2 AgResearch, Mosgiel 3 Landcare Research, Lincoln DI...

3. Te-Iwi-o-Ngati-Tukorehe-Trust-Cultural-Impact-Assessment-v2.pdf [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...  Te Iwi o Ngāti Tukorehe Trust  In  1988,  TIONTT was  established  under  the  Charitable  Trust Act  1955.  It  is  a  political  entity  that  seeks  to  represent and manage  the  social, economic, cultural and environmental aspirations of  the  Iwi.2 TIONTT has  established several partnerships with local and central government agencies. It also appoints delegates to the  Kōmiti Whaiti of Te Rūnanga o Raukawa and the Rau...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 080 NZ Heavy Haulage v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Methods were specified: • Rules which permit relocated buildings subject to performance standards relating to previous use, foundations, and a performance bond and owner certification to maintain and enhance amenity values. • Assessment of environmental effects through the resource consent process for proposals that are not permitted, because of non-compliance with performance standards. Use of conditions on resource consents to control the effects of relocated buildings. •...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 153 Selwyn Quarries Limited v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...would have adopted the Highest Recorded Groundwater Level ("HRGL") plus a 1 m buffer.18 Elsewhere in the decision the Commissioners appeared to regard the 1 m between excavations (hence backfilling) and groundwater to be "a critical environmental bottom line that should be adhered to 100 percent of the time and strictly enforced by the consent authorities".19 [21] It is clear that the Hearings Commissioners regarded 1 m freeboard above the static highest recorded...

6. 2021-07-05 Nga Runanga - Closing Submissions [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...of issues before the Court, it has taken a responsible and thoughtful approach throughout. PROBLEM DEFINITION AND ACCEPTANCE 9. It is submitted that there are two limbs to the problem that PC7 is intended to resolve: a planning problem, and an environmental one. The limbs are inextricably linked. Planning problem 10. PC7 is founded on the fact that the operative Regional Plan: Water for Otago (Water Plan) does not offer flow and allocation regimes for catchments in the Otago Region...

7. All charges and convicted charges December 2020 [xlsx, 270 KB]

   ...offences 2,481 2,498 2,432 2,359 2,686 3,232 3,625 4,022 4,052 3,900 3,358 3,634 3,498 3,740 3,999 3,880 3,944 4,184 4,513 4,422 4,243 4,237 4,515 5,137 5,320 5,667 6,888 6,775 6,588 7,091 6,174 5,298 4,960 5,016 4,273 4,429 4,932 5,519 5,516 5,596 6,489 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 6,253 6,230 6,475 6,937 7,390 7,004 8,398 8,045 7,952 7,668 6,680 7,557 7,496 8,102 9,869 10,885 11,178 10,785 11,220 11,879 12,027 12,029 12,154 12,514 13,321 13,286 15,226 15,528 16,175 16,280...

8. All charges and convicted charges June 2020 [xlsx, 269 KB]

   ...offences 2,560 2,478 2,293 2,587 2,847 3,554 3,880 4,009 4,181 3,323 3,598 3,496 3,523 3,998 3,983 3,759 4,043 4,415 4,576 4,302 4,246 4,269 4,979 5,064 5,360 6,455 6,761 6,720 6,914 6,658 5,615 5,131 5,194 4,344 4,394 4,642 5,339 5,482 5,455 5,874 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 5,972 6,586 6,602 6,955 7,389 7,540 8,408 7,806 8,233 6,999 7,020 7,736 7,574 8,449 11,107 10,774 11,078 11,107 11,526 11,833 12,351 11,946 12,003 13,141 13,112 14,725 14,715 16,382 15,857 16,072 13,89...

9. All charges and convicted charges December 2019 [xlsx, 857 KB]

   ...offences 2,481 2,498 2,432 2,359 2,686 3,232 3,625 4,022 4,052 3,900 3,358 3,634 3,498 3,740 3,999 3,880 3,944 4,184 4,513 4,422 4,243 4,237 4,515 5,137 5,320 5,667 6,888 6,775 6,588 7,091 6,174 5,298 4,960 5,016 4,273 4,429 4,932 5,519 5,512 5,599 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 6,253 6,230 6,475 6,937 7,390 7,004 8,398 8,046 7,952 7,668 6,680 7,557 7,496 8,102 9,869 10,885 11,178 10,785 11,220 11,879 12,027 12,029 12,154 12,514 13,321 13,286 15,226 15,528 16,175 16,280 14,997...

10. All charges and convicted charges June 2021 [xlsx, 271 KB]

    ...offences 2,560 2,478 2,293 2,587 2,847 3,554 3,880 4,009 4,181 3,323 3,598 3,496 3,523 3,998 3,983 3,759 4,043 4,415 4,576 4,302 4,246 4,269 4,979 5,064 5,360 6,455 6,760 6,720 6,913 6,658 5,615 5,131 5,194 4,344 4,394 4,642 5,339 5,482 5,455 5,865 6,587 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 5,972 6,586 6,602 6,955 7,389 7,540 8,408 7,805 8,233 6,999 7,020 7,736 7,574 8,449 11,107 10,774 11,078 11,107 11,526 11,833 12,351 11,946 12,003 13,137 13,113 14,723 14,713 16,381 15,857 16,072...