HK & KP v RPP Ltd [2018] NZDT 1133 (9 May 2018) [pdf, 74 KB]
...consider the plan reference will most probably be to the Sika AT. [7] I am satisfied that the sealant applied by RPP LTD to the cladding has failed. Mr KR has explained that the installation was as specified and has suggested that pollution or environmental conditions (including sun or smoke residue) may be responsible given localised areas where the failure is more evident. [8] I accept MR HK and Mrs KP’s evidence they have regularly maintained the exterior of the house. The...