Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 045 Gray v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 527 KB]

   ...s104D context. This will be important where there is a disparity between closely related provisions as there appears to be in this case.30 That approach was accepted by counsel. [162] In the court’s view, this should account for: 30 Environmental Defence Society Inc v King Salmon Company Ltd [2014] NZSC 38, at [131]. 36 (a) Objective 16.2.1 which reserves the rural zones for productive rural activities and the protection and enhancement of the natural environment;...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 110 Western Bay of Plenty District Council v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...interpret the phrase "Mana i te whenua" as "our authority for or autonomy over '"' these lands." The ability of the hapo to govern ourselves as we have done for \ centuries, to determine our own internal political, environmental, economic, and social ·~ 34 rights and objectives, and to act collectively in accordance with those objectives, is paramount to the wellbeing of the hapD and the Island's natural environments. Our rights and obligati...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 230 Arachchige v Rasier New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 398 KB]

   ...device) and/or time amounts, as detailed at www.uber.com/cities for the applicable Territory. You can also charge the User for any applicable road, bridge, ferry, tunnel and airport charges and any other fees (including inner-city congestion, environmental or miscellaneous charges as reasonably determined by the Uber Services) (“Tolls”), taxes and/or fees incurred during the provision of Transportation Services, whether charged by a third party or Rasier NZ. Rasier NZ reserves...

4. [2021] NZEnvC 007 JJ Limited v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...relevant plan(s). [17] The parties and their witnesses agree the effects of the activity will be minor and, the first threshold test having been met, the proposal may be considered under s 104 of the Act.14 As we accept their assessment of the environmental effects, pursuant to s 104 we will consider the application for resource consent having particular regard to: (a) the operative and proposed Otago Regional Policy Statements; (b) the operative and proposed Dunedin City D...

5. People with finalised charges (including convicted charges) December 2023 [xlsx, 273 KB]

   ...offences 798 787 810 818 941 1,136 1,238 1,371 1,314 1,311 1,138 1,159 1,148 1,317 1,356 1,239 1,259 1,292 1,371 1,376 1,286 1,336 1,352 1,550 1,595 1,634 1,803 1,839 1,949 2,067 1,881 1,644 1,526 1,549 1,322 1,340 1,481 1,416 1,446 1,391 1,524 1,297 1,440 1,542 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 2,202 2,104 2,284 2,365 2,455 2,505 2,940 2,903 2,902 2,797 2,408 2,562 2,752 2,943 3,277 3,837 3,718 3,530 3,643 3,606 3,911 3,954 3,935 4,060 4,170 4,079 4,412 4,685 4,897 5,038 4,619 4...

6. [2021] NZACC 74 - Brown v ACC (17 May 2021) [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...medical advice in relation to it. Her submissions had been filed in December 2019. The panel comprised Dr Fong, Ms Gordon a physiotherapist, Mr Hunter an orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Medlicott another orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Obele an occupational and environmental medicine specialist and the last member was Dr Rutherford who is also an orthopaedic surgeon. They all have many years’ experience as advisory panel members to ACC. The finding of the Panel was that a causal link between...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 189 508 Chapel Road Partnership Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...activity under rule E36.4.1 (A38) C. Conditions GENERAL CONDITIONS Plans and Information 1. Except as modified by any specific conditions of consent set out below, the childcare centre shall be as described in the Application Form and Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Campbell Brown Planning Limited, dated 20 April 2018, and carried out in accordance with the attached plans identified as follows: Plan title and reference Prepared by Rev Dated Figure A1 from Acoust...

8. People charged and convicted of offences December 2022 [xlsx, 270 KB]

   ...offences 798 787 810 818 941 1,136 1,238 1,371 1,314 1,311 1,138 1,159 1,148 1,317 1,356 1,239 1,259 1,292 1,371 1,376 1,286 1,336 1,352 1,550 1,595 1,634 1,803 1,839 1,949 2,067 1,881 1,644 1,526 1,549 1,322 1,340 1,481 1,415 1,446 1,391 1,525 1,301 1,436 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 2,202 2,104 2,284 2,365 2,455 2,505 2,940 2,903 2,902 2,797 2,408 2,562 2,752 2,943 3,277 3,837 3,718 3,530 3,643 3,606 3,911 3,954 3,935 4,060 4,170 4,079 4,412 4,685 4,897 5,038 4,620 4,195 4...

9. [2021] NZEnvC 136 The Canyon Vineyard Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

   ...wildness and remoteness as the upper mountains within the ONL. Although not protected in a s6(b) context, he notes that the landscape qualities of an ORL are recognised as providing a significant contribution to the cultural and amenity values and environmental quality of this rural environment.38 [155] We note that the Plan’s description of the RU states that these qualities are enhanced by the “human made elements” which are stated as including the orchards and vineyards...

10. 20240930-Sentencing-Reform-Proactive-Release-2nd-Tranche_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.7 MB]

    ...intent/burglary, break and enter 23 3 26 12% 08: Theft and related offences 7 1 8 09: Fraud, deception and related offences 2 2 10: Illicit drug offences 19 10 29 34% 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 8 1 9 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 1 1 14: Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences 7 7 15: Offences against justice procedures, government security and government operations 9 1 10 10% Total 156 34 190 18% * Percentages not calculated when total numbe...