Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 150 Hamilton Homezone Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 26 MB]

   ...infrastructure including site offices / amenities, contractors’ yard access, equipment unloading and storage areas, contractor car parking and security; (e) Methods and systems to inform and train all persons working on the site of potential environmental issues and how to avoid remedy or mitigate any potential adverse effects; (f) Procedures for ensuring that adjacent residents, businesses within the Home Straight precinct are given prior notice of the commencement of const...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 095 Lomai Properties Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...precinct provisions will ensure that subdivision and development occurs in an appropriate way responding 7 to the particular features of the Waipupuke site. This includes provisions that: (i) recognise mana whenua values and achieve positive environmental outcomes for the health and well-being of the land, waterways and people; (ii) ensure the development of urban activities is undertaken in a comprehensive and integrated way (recognising the importance of the Neighbourho...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 182 The Rise Ltd v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...RM160234, subject to all modifications specifically provided for via conditions of consent and the amended Scheme Plan prepared by Pacific Coast Consultants (File Ref 1935 (Revision 6)), dated October 2017: • Application Form, and Assessment of Environmental Effects prepared by Traverse Developments Limited entitled 'Application for Resource Consent pursuant to the Fourth Schedule and Section 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991: The Rise Limited, Cove Road, Mangawhai; •...

4. NZCVS topical report Cycle 1 (2018) - Highly Victimised people [pdf, 934 KB]

   ...or household composition when compared with other victims Like the way we looked at demographic differences we can identify whether highly victimised people are overrepresented in particular places or environments to see whether there are any environmental indicators of high victimisation. Based on our analysis there is no significant difference in the representation of the highly victimised people between the North and South Island or the four largest regions of New Zealand (see Fi...

5. Chittock v ACC [2014] NZACA 4 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...activities and some maximum assistance and some activities he can manage with supervision.” [14] Ms Kenworthy did not summarise the Malpress and Finnis assessments, but said: “I have read the reports from Dr Malpress, Occupational and Environmental Health Physician, and Mr Finnis, Neurosurgeon, but rehabilitation of spinal injuries is not their particular field of expertise or specialisation and, while I have considered their reports, have placed less reliability on their obse...

6. Domestic violence programme evaluation report [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Evaluation aims & questions ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Environmental scan ................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 This report .................................................................

7. [2024] NZEnvC 116 Glen Dene Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...of buildings from waterbodies RD Discretion is restricted to: a. Indigenous biodiversity values; b. Visual amenity values; c. Landscape; d. Open space and the interaction of the development with the water body; e. Environmental protection measures (including landscaping and stormwater management); f. Natural hazards; and g. Effects on cultural values of manawhenua. 46.5.5.1: The minimum setback of any building from the bed of a riv...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 255 Friends of Nelson Haven v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 551 KB]

   ...also included areas where NZ king shag and other seabirds will not regularly feed because of seasonal or annual variability in prey abundance and at times because of limited foraging opportunities through reduced prey availability from natural environmental conditions (e.g. stormy weather) or anthropogenic activities (e.g. disturbance of 47 seabed from benthic trawling for flatfish). The proposed marine habitat is significant for the threatened NZ king shag given its small and...

9. Rebecca Liv Stirnemann - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 699 KB]

   ...Roger Grace observed numerous small workups of trevally close in to the islands, but nothing like the several acres of boiling fish 765 seen in the late 1960's (Grace pers com). No-take areas need to be much larger to enable the supportive environmental attributes of ecological function for avifauna. 41. I acknowledge that not all seabird species are likely to be impacted by the MN EMA beyond avoidance of individual bird deaths, due to the vast dispersal of bird behaviow (f...

10. LCRO 15/2021 JBC Limited v KD (24 August 2021) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...following: [T]he judicial review jurisdiction is about the process that was followed to reach a decision, not the merits of the decision itself. So we don’t have to prove that the decision itself was wrong. We have to show that they only considered environmental effects, not the effect on you as affected persons, that they didn’t actually make a decision on notification and that they took into account irrelevant considerations and [ignored] relevant ones. [66] I do not read that...