[2023] NZEnvC 226 Scaife v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]
...so is in issue in the appeal. Firstly, visitor accommodation and the other activities are intended to be “at a small scale and low intensity”. Secondly, Obj 46.2.1 prescribes that this is to be in a manner that achieves seven specified environmental outcomes, namely:11 9 There is another 12.5 ha site simply noted as “Rural Visitor Zone”. 10 This policy makes some qualified provision for residential activity in the Arcadia RVZ but that is not relevant in this case....