Search Results

1. Children and young people with charges finalised in any court June 2019 [xlsx, 266 KB]

   ...10: Illicit drug offences 408 372 324 279 138 105 168 135 150 105 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 432 378 267 291 219 174 207 213 198 162 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 1,932 1,869 1,815 1,497 1,161 987 858 987 756 642 12% 13% 14% 13% 11% 11% 10% 10% 9% 8% 13: Public order offences 1,161 1,098 894 741 789 681 606 717 489 366 7% 8% 7% 6% 8% 8% 7% 7% 6% 5% 14: Traffic and vehicle regulat...

2. Children and young people with charges finalised in the Youth Court June 2019 [xlsx, 256 KB]

   ...10: Illicit drug offences 387 366 312 279 135 96 168 129 147 102 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 417 369 261 282 222 171 207 207 201 162 3% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 1,884 1,803 1,779 1,467 1,140 978 843 942 735 633 13% 13% 14% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% 9% 8% 13: Public order offences 1,125 1,074 873 723 786 651 600 696 483 366 8% 8% 7% 7% 8% 8% 7% 8% 6% 5% 14: Traffic and vehicle regulato...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 200 Director-General of Conservation v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 662 KB]

   ...the harvesting or maintenance of trees as part of forestry, provided that all vegetation that is felled within 10m of a water body must be felled away from the water body, and that the forestry is conducted in accordance with recognised industry environmental codes of practice; xi. vegetation clearance of an area of Manuka that is adversely affected by Manuka Blight caused by Eriococcus orariensis (outside ASBVs, ONFs, ONCCs, HNCCs and NCCs only); {Director-General of Conservation, 87}...

4. Annexure 7 - Decisions on Submissions [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...permits with review conditions, without “clawing back” allocation or preventing irrigation of land uses prior to a new land and water plan framework that gives effect to the NPSFM. Reject All Plan Change 7 70033 70033.01 Central Otago Environmental Society Inc. Support Implement an interim consenting regime to ensure that issued consents are fit for purpose and do not undermine the implementation of the NPSFWM 2020. Consents issued going forward must implement the NPSFWM...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 166 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...provisions in section 7 RMA? 4.6 The National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management 4.7 The Otago Regional Policy Statement and some conclusions 4.8 Sections 32 and 32AA identification of the options to be considered 4.9 Is a draft National Environmental Standard on Ecological Flows and Water Levels relevant? 5. Predicting the future hydrological characteristics of the Lindis River 5.1 Introduction to the scenarios exemplifying the options 5.2 The assumptions and the hydrogr...

6. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief legal submissions [pdf, 436 KB]

   ...Page 10 31557164:629148 dredging will be expensive and will have to exceed two metres in depth for large parts. The dredged material is estimated to amount to 142,000 cubic metres. The disposal of those dredged tailings creates an immediate environmental issue. … [35] This situation is very different from that in Body Corporate 97010. It can be readily seen in that case how issues as to complying parking had no effect on the size, shape and location of the building and on...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 150 Arthurs Point Outstanding Natural Landscape Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ..."the Act"). The issues are restated more precisely below. [2] The treatment of the Arthurs Point area in the plan change has already been the subject of two relevant procedural decisions between the same parties in appeals by the Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated (ENV-2018-CHC-56) ("the UCESI appeal") and by Arthurs Point Land Trust ("APL T") (ENV-2018-CHC-76). The procedural decision2 Arthurs Point Trustee Limited v Queenstown Lakes Distric...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 184 Tasman District Council v Awaroa Aerodrome Ltd [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...over each decade since the airstrip was established. Having done so, we 16 undertake our own evaluation of the evidence to inform our findings on flight numbers. Evidence for the Cozmd/ • Ms Brownlee is a contractor with the Council in the environmental information and consent planning teams. She does not live at Awaroa but in Richmond. She said that her whanau have owned the property at what is now 69 Awaroa Inlet since late 1984 when it was purchased by her parents. From...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML rebuttal Jon Styles [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...5. To preface the assessments I have undertaken, I note that none of the operational noise sources in the marina are expected to generate noise containing Special Audible Characteristics as defined by section 6.3 of NZS6802:2008 Acoustics – Environmental Noise. LA10 to LAeq Assessment 6. As required by section 10 of the Joint Statement, I have prepared an assessment of noise effects arising from the proposed change in noise level descriptor from the older LA10 metric used in...

10. Whanganui District Council – Kai Iwi 5G3A1, 5G3A2, 5G3B, 5G3C, 5H1 & 5H2 (2012) 295 Aotea MB 17 (295 AOT 17) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...primary submission of the owners whom he spoke for was that they should now administer the land themselves in place of the Council. The owners who supported these proposals had their own plans for the land that centred on cultural, historic and environmental considerations more than economic. [9] In addition, Mr Mair submitted that his kuia, Kahutaratara and Ngatatau, owned a significant proportion of the shares but had not yet had been the subject of succession orders. Even so, h...