Pomare v Rangihaeata - Hongoeka 7 (2009) 16 Whanganui Appellate Court MB 88 (16 WGAP 88) [pdf, 420 KB]
...not represent an error in the decision, nor does it landlock Hongoeka Bay and Hongoeka Marae. Improved access is provided. [31] The respondents referred to the great expense that forming the existing legal roadway would incur, as well as the environmental concerns that would arise. [32] In terms of the roadway width, the evidence presented on behalf of Porirua City Council, was that a roadway width of 20 metres would not necessarily allow the possible developments referred to by t...