Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 102 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v West Coast Regional Council [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...the same in a costs award should be followed; (e) in any event, the parties have not supplied sufficient detailed evidence of the costs actually incurred; (f) any award in favour of F&B ought to account for the funding received from the Environmental Legal Assistance Fund (ELA); (g) the hearing was a test case on the chapter 7 RPS provisions, which counts against any award of costs been made; and (h) if an award is made, costs of various of the witnesses ought to be exclud...

2. BORA Hazardous Substances And New Organisms (Transitional Provisions And Controls) Amendment Bill [pdf, 13 KB]

   ...were previously subject to controls under separate Acts covering animal remedies, explosives, dangerous goods, pesticides and toxic substances. 3. Under the provisions of this Bill, new hazardous substances will be subject to controls through the Environmental Risk Management Authority (the Authority) approval process. Current legislative controls over existing hazardous substances will be phased out over time to enable a smooth transition. These substances will have new HSNO controls a...

3. 2020-04-08-MfE-PC7-s-1422-Direction.pdf [pdf, 542 KB]

   ...suitable members to a board of inquiry difficult in a short timeframe whereas the Environment Court process would provide surety in terms of progressing a decision on the matter. Page 2 of 2 In reaching my decision I considered: a) The Environmental Protection Authority recommendation that I refer the matter to the Environment Court; b) The views of the Otago Regional Council, being the applicant and the relevant local authority that would have processed and decided the matt...

4. Fulton Hogan Limited 217 [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...entirety of the proceedings and supports the Appellant's appeal for the following reasons: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Amenity Standards ("AAAQS") impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) there is n...

5. Fulton Hogan Limited 222 [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...entirety of the proceedings and supports the Appellant's appeal for the following reasons: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Amenity Standards ("AAAQS") impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) there is n...

6. Fulton Hogan Limited 225 [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...entirety of the proceedings and supports the Appellant's appeal for the following reasons: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Amenity Standards ("AAAQS") impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) there is n...

7. Fulton Hogan Limited 223 [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...entirety of the proceedings and supports the Appellant's appeal for the following reasons: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Amenity Standards ("AAAQS") impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) there is n...

8. Fulton Hogan Limited 228 [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...entirety of the proceedings and support's the Appellant's appeal for the following reasons: (a) the Ambient Air Quality Amenity Standards ("AAAQS") impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) ther...

9. The Crown [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...maintained for the community and future events; (d) ensuring Mana Whenua are provided opportunities for ongoing engagement throughout the process; (e) enabling the delivery of a world class event; and (f) avoiding, remedying and mitigating environmental effects. Relief sought 6. The Crown supports the Application and seeks that it be granted, subject to appropriate conditions. 7. In relation to paragraph 5(c) above, the Crown seeks conditions in relation to the legacy use o...

10. Ports of Auckland Limited 225 [pdf, 60 KB]

    ...4. POAL is interested in the entirety of the proceedings and supports the Appellant's appeal for the reasons given by the Appellant and because: (a) the AAAQS impose greater restrictions on activities than what is provided for in the National Environmental Standard for Air Quality 2004; (b) the imposition of those higher standards does not promote the purpose of the RMA; (c) there is no justification for the inclusion of the AAAQS in terms of section 32 of the RMA; and (d) th...