Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 111 Tussock Rise Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 8.4 MB]

   ...Council Date of Decision: 21 June 2019 Date of Issue: 21 June 2019 PROCEDURAL DECISION A: Under section 279(4) of the Resource Management Act 1991 the Environment Court refuses to strike out any parts of the appeal by Tussock Rise Limited. B: Costs are reserved. Tussock Rise Limited v QLDC - Procedural Decision 2 Table of Contents Para [ 1] [1] [5] 1. 2. 3. 4. Introduction 1.1 The issues and the application to strike-out 1.2 The steps leading to the appea...

2. Whaanga v Niania - Anewa Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 428 (2011 APPEAL 428) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...shareholders‖. As the uncontested evidence demonstrates, the removal of Rata will not detrimentally affect the farming operation, is unlikely to significantly diminish the income of the Trust, will remove land from the Trust that carries its own rating and cost burden, and will likely result in an improved financial bottom-line that will be shared across a smaller shareholding. Thus, it is quite conceivable that the partition will result in a benefit to

3. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Mark Walrond [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...volcanic rocks (including vent structures), it is recommended that a surveyor should be engaged to advise if historical survey data can be used to confirm any movement of benchmarks that may be available at the summit of Porteous Hill. This would enable a cost-effective determination, however if this is not possible then further geological mapping and geotechnical investigation including drilling should be considered to enable full confirmation of slope stability. Attention will be required to...

4. Mane - Waihou A8C1B1 (2015) 117 Taitokerau MB 215 (117 TTK 215) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...the current applications and to Maude Fraser a copy of this decision and Mr Lee’s occupation plan 8629; (c) Pursuant to ss 37(3), 69 and 98 of the 1993 Act the Court issues an order calling evidence from a registered valuer whose reasonable costs are to be met out of the Special Aid Fund. The valuer is to value the curtilage around the homestead of 1,920m² as depicted in Mr Lee’s occupation plan 8629 and the overall value of Waihou A8C1B1, and is to calculate the number of...

5. Andrew Michael Collins - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...prepared a section 32AA evaluation in his Attachment 8. He addresses the following matters in relation to three options (do nothing; BO PRC proposals; MRMT proposals) : • Relevance • Usefulness • Reasonable and achievable • Benefits • Costs/risks • Efficiency • Effectiveness 7 .9 In Mr Lawrence's Attachment 19 he refers, inter alia, to the provisions of Chapter 8 (Indigenous Biodiversity) of the Proposed Marlborough Environment Plan (June 2016) and he includ...

6. Directory of Official Information M-O [pdf, 511 KB]

   ...Functions and responsibilities As well as emphasising our primary function of promoting te reo me ngā tikanga Māori, the Māori Television Service (Te Aratuku Whakaata Irirangi Māori) Act 2003 also requires that we: provide a high quality, cost-effective Māori television service, in both Māori and English, that informs, educates and entertains a broad viewing audience, and in doing so, enriches New Zealand’s society, culture and heritage; • broadcast mainly in te reo Māori...

7. OWRUG - EiC - M Curran - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 528 KB]

   ...introduces significant uncertainty into the consent process for applicants. 16 BI-1035600-2-242-V5 81. The uncertainty associated with having to progress applications to dam water as non-complying activities under PC7, coupled with the cost of preparing a resource consent application for a non-complying activity could mean a halt on dam maintenance, replacement and development work that requires a large capital investment. As previously noted, the inability to commit to...

8. Te Ohu Kaimoana Trustee Limited v Te Rūnanga nui o te Aupōuri - application under s 182(4) Māori Fisheries Act 2004 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 1 (102 TTK 1) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...the parties. It is clear that the Te Hiku iwi have been able to achieve a great deal in the recent past by working together in a collaborative way. This dispute over a portion of the Fisheries Settlement assets has the potential to extract a high cost in terms of financial and human resources and goodwill. I encourage the parties to keep trying to reach agreement. Dated in Wellington this 1 st day of May 2015. MJ Doogan JUDGE

9. Jessup v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2024] NZACC 005 [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...his employment. [85] Mr Jessup’s appeal is allowed, and the decision of the Reviewer dated 30 November 2020 is therefore set aside. 12 J, above note 9, at [52]. 13 Ambros, above note 8, at [67]. 29 [86] Mr Jessup is entitled to costs. If these cannot be agreed within one month, I shall determine the issue following the filing of memoranda. P R Spiller District Court Judge Solicitors for the Appellant: Schmidt & Peart Law

10. Appendix-8_Peter-Stacey_s87F_198D-Report_Air_28-April-23.pdf [pdf, 354 KB]

    ...Levin Both supports and opposes application While Ms Naylor supports the overall objectives of the project, she is concerned that dust from construction activities will contaminate roof–collected tank water. She is also concerned about the costs of cleaning tanks/replacement of pumps. Furthermore, she would like Waka Kotahi to provide preventative measures to all households that rely on roof water supply in the 'dust risk zone'. These could include isolating the tanks fr...