Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley [2016] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 601 KB]
...ability to practice for an indefinite period could be regarded as responsible. The Tribunal’s responsibility to take account of the purposes of the Act, in the maintenance of public confidence in the provision of legal services and protection of consumers of legal services leaves us with no other alternative. [90] We wish to state however that we were impressed by the practitioner’s conduct during the hearing and leading up to the hearing, in terms of his cooperation with the...