Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 08 - MT v Murthy (21 February 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...would not be reasonable to order Ms Murthy to reimburse any of it (beyond the partial refund). As noted already, she was not primarily responsible for the decline of the application. Her failure made a minor contribution to the decline only. The consequential financial burden and stresses on the complainant were not caused by any of Ms Murthy’s wrongdoing upheld by the Tribunal. It was Immigration NZ’s decision which led to the complainant and her daughter going to Lebanon w...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 171 University of Otago v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...from any other hazardous sub-facility on the same site and meet the Following locational requirements: a . ... 5. Amend Appendix A6. Hazardous Substances Quantity Limits, by deleting the entirety of Appendix A6.4 Campus Zone. General 6. Make any consequential changes to plan numbering as required as a result of the above amendments. Minor referencing and style changes may also be made for consistency with the 2GP formatting. rcou~

3. PD v QB [2024] NZDT 573 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...bike had no issues. Damages CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 can be measured by the difference between the actual value of the car and the expected value of the car in the condition as represented. The buyer can also recover any foreseeable consequential losses. 14. The parties disagreed as to what the estimated value of the bike would be if it was sold with the defects disclosed. PD says that it would be worth $1000.00 for parts, QB says that as it could be ridden1 it would be...

4. Regulatory-Systems-Courts-Improvement-Amendment-Bill_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...Cabinet’s agreement, the RSAB will implement 89 changes across 25 Acts. We do not consider the amendments to be contentious. Policy decisions made under delegated authority 6 Cabinet delegated to us the authority to approve minor, technical, consequential, and transitional amendments consistent with Cabinet decisions on the Bills identified during the parliamentary process [SOU-24-MIN-0117 refers]. We have agreed to four additional amendments under this delegation (amendments 2, 3,...

5. Director of Proceedings v Smith (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...APPLICATION FOR COSTS Procedural background [17] The circumstances of the present application for costs are unusual. On the substantive issue whether the defendant breached the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights) Regulations 1996 (Code) in respect of Right 4(1) the defendant consented to a declaration under HDCA, s 54(1)(a) that she had breached this right by failing to provide services to the aggrieved person with reasonable...

6. [2018] NZEmpC 111 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...relation to the application for costs in the Court; (c) he raises issues about claimed disbursements; and 1 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [2018] NZEmpC 79. (d) he disagrees with the “consequential” claims advanced (being for interest sought on the costs judgment sum, and costs associated with the costs application). Costs payable in relation to the Authority [3] Clause 15 of sch 2 of the Employment Relations...

7. Central Standards Committee 3 v Bong [2023] NZLCDT 24 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...with misconduct.1 Alternatives pleaded were negligence2 or unsatisfactory conduct. The latter was admitted by Mr Bong. [2] This decision gives our reasons for finding liability at the level of unsatisfactory conduct and makes penalty orders consequential on that finding. Brief factual background [3] Mr Bong acted for Ms W on the sale of a business which she told him she was operating on her own.3 Ms W also owned the property from which the business was operated in her sole...

8. Barfoot & Thompson v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 48 [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...example, where a separate licensee is not required to act as an intermediary negotiator between the client and the licensee purchaser. However, it is submitted for the Authority that the Committee was correct to find that, in cases involving most consumer clients, steps of that kind will be required in the interests of fairness to protect the client and to avoid the perception of conflict of interest. Mr Hodge adds that Barfoot & Thompson’s policy does not provide for such measure...

9. OWRUG Updated Supplementary S Dicey Planning 24 March 2021 [pdf, 789 KB]

   ...is a lack of clarity about what evidence might be required or accepted to show that irrigation areas have not expanded. For larger schemes, which can cover thousands of hectares and have hundreds of shareholders, this would be complex and time consuming. As such it does not serve the process based purpose of PC7. 3 PP-1035600-2-391-V1 12. In addition, the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Freshwater) Regulations 2020 effectively manages expansion...

10. LCRO 193/2017 AA v BB and CC (29 November 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...Firm] partnership on 31 December 2018 and was now practising as a barrister. He confirmed that Ms CC represented [NUA] as junior counsel from July 2015 to early October 2017. Ms CC’s involvement with the [NUA] file ended in October 2017, consequential upon resigning her employment position with [Law Firm]. [53] In response to the submissions, Mr BB submitted that: (a) Subsequent to Mr AA filing submissions with the LCRO in November 2017, there have been nine judgments delivere...