Search Results

1. KB & Ors v TC & RV [2023] NZDT 634 (25 September 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...became unconditional. None of these dates were expressly specified on the contract and cannot be ascertained from the document itself as it is undated. The contract never became unconditional, therefore the $30,000.00 deposit was not paid. 4. The Applicants’ claim states the contract was signed on 29 July 2021, however the correspondence indicates that it was 2022. At the hearing, the Applicants confirmed it was 2022. 5. The Applicants claim that as a result of the failure of...

2. AEL Ltd v ZVL [2012] NZDT 310 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 43 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 310 BETWEEN AEL LTD APPLICANT AND ZVL RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 April 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVL, pay the amount of $312.57 to the Applicant, AEL Ltd, on or before 27 April 2012. Facts [1] The Applicant claims $506.93 in respect of plumbing services rendered to the R...

3. MG v UT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1422 (16 March 2021) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1422 APPLICANT MG Limited RESPONDENT UT Limited SECOND RESPONDENT KL APPLICANT'S INSURER JB Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This claim relates to damage caused by UT Limited (“UT”) to a vehicle owned by MG Limited. The incident happened in July 2019. UT never denied it was liable for the cost of repair, but a dispute arose a...

4. Mhatre v Gokhale [2017] NZIACDT 13 (29 August 2017) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...different views as to the facts. The Registrar set out her view of the facts in the statement of complaint, it is relatively uncomplicated: [1.1] On 19 September 2016, the complainant engaged the adviser to lodge a partnership-based temporary visa application on his behalf. A written agreement of 27 September 2016 provided terms for the professional engagement. The complainant’s partner was in New Zealand studying, and nearing a point where she would be seeking a work visa so th...

5. LD v BD Ltd & BT Ltd [2023] NZDT 560 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 560 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT BD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against BD Ltd is withdrawn. The claim against BT Ltd is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by telephone. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] LD and his insurer, BJ Ltd confirm they wish to withdraw t...

6. DK v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 293 (22 May 2024) [pdf, 125 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 293 APPLICANT DK RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay DK $1,999.00 on or before 14 June 2024. Reasons 1. DK purchased a travel insurance policy from B Ltd trading as BQ. On the second day of his trip to the UK his tooth broke. He got it fixed at a Dentist in Birmingham on 5 August 2022. He then made a claim on...

7. DD v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 318 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 318 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 16 October 2023, DD joined the XX shop membership scheme, operated by T Ltd (the company). This scheme provides discounts on certain purchases. She paid $500.00 into her account and then purchased $150.00 of baby nappies, leaving a balance of...

8. L v EQC [2022] CEIT-2019-0038 / 0044 [pdf, 221 KB]

   1 IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0038-2019 CEIT-0044-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN L T L Applicant AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION Respondent ___________________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF E J FLASZYNSKI Dated: 16 February 2022 ___________________________________________________________________...

9. DF v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 235 (19 May 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 235 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,000.00 to DF on or before Monday, 12 June 2023. REASONS 1. The Applicant, DF, is the owner of a 1994 [vehicle]. DF has the [vehicle] insured with the Respondent, U Ltd, under a [Insurance Policy]. The policy has an agreed value of $12,000.00 and up to a...

10. BU & DQ v NN [2023] NZDT 281 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 105 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 281 APPLICANT BU APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: A. NN is to pay $3,256.49 to BU and DQ on or before 16 August 2023. B. NN’s counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BU, DQ and NN lived together as flatmates and co-tenants at [Address]. They had all signed a fixed term lease which commenced on 9 April 2022, and was to...