Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 102 van Kleef v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...disclosure; the second is an application for dismissal for want of prosecution brought by Alliance Group Ltd (Alliance). Both applications have been on foot for some time. Common to each has been a problem of extensive delay in advancing disclosure requests as raised by Ms van Kleef. What this case is about [2] Before turning to the particular issues, it is necessary to repeat what I said about the background of this case in my first interlocutory judgment. [3] The proceedings a...

2. GT Ltd v SX & TX & EN Ltd [2022] NZDT 49 (27 January 2022) [pdf, 122 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 49 APPLICANT GT Limited RESPONDENT SX Trading As: TTE SECOND RESPONDENT TX Trading As: TTE THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT EN Limited Trading as TTE The Tribunal orders: 1. SX and EN Limited, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $1,100.00 to GT Limited on or before Thursday 10...

3. Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 443 KB]

   ...INTRODUCTION [1] This case is about a request for access to personal information held by an agency, a request repeated on multiple occasions. In the four month period from 14 February 2013 to 15 June 2013 (the period covered by the amended statement of claim dated 15 January 2016 (ASoC)) no fewer than twelve access requests were allegedly made by the plaintiff. The legal consequences of those requests are addressed in this decision. Background to the requests [2] Dr Lisa Turner is a...

4. MT v L Ltd [2021] NZDT 1597 (29 June 2021) [pdf, 166 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1597 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application against L Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. The hearing on 9 June 2021 was a continuation of an earlier hearing (6 May 2021) which was adjourned part-heard as insufficient time was allowed for me to adequately determine the issues. 2. At t...

5. KX and NX v GV Ltd [2022] NZDT 47 (14 January 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 47 APPLICANT KX NX RESPONDENT GV LtdGV LtdGV Ltd The Tribunal orders: NX is added as an applicant to the application with the consent of the parties. GV LtdGV Ltd is to pay KX and NX the sum of $210.00 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. In or about May 2021, NX entered into a contrac

6. E Ltd v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 721 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 721 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay E Ltd $30,000 on or before 5.00pm 28 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In 2020, E Ltd purchased timber from O Ltd, who supplied H4 treated timber for decks and stairs that were being built in his property development. In June 2021, during the building of the...

7. SO v TH [2024] NZDT 536 (25 July 2024) [pdf, 235 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 536 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT TH The Tribunal orders: The claim by SO is struck out. Reasons 1. SO is a taxi driver. She drives for HU Ltd who is the applicant in [file number redacted], which was heard together with SO’s claim. HU Ltd is part of HT Society Limited. TH is the Chairman of the Board of HT. 2. SO is unha...

8. SE v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 654 (23 November 2023) [pdf, 220 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 654 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim SE RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against D Ltd Result of application for rehearing: 1. A rehearing is refused. 2. The order of 17 August 2023 stands. 3. The stay of proceedings granted on 1 September 2023 has lapsed. Reasons: 1. On 17...

9. SX v R Ltd & M Ltd [2024 NZDT 14 (27 February 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 14 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT R Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT INSURER E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. SX owned a rental property at [address] which was property managed by M Ltd, a franchisee of R Ltd. SX alleges M Ltd acted negligently on her behalf bec...

10. What happens next

    The person who makes the application or claim is called the applicant. A person who has a claim made against them is called the respondent. When the Copyright Tribunal gets the application We’ll contact the applicant to confirm we’ve received their application. We’ll also let the respondent know an application has been filed against them. When the chairperson decides the case is ready for a pre-hearing telephone conference, we’ll contact the people involved (the parties) and arrange a ti...

    Located in:

    1. Tribunals >
    2. Copyright >
    3. Licensing scheme disputes