Search Results

1. Legal aid fee schedules excluding CMM [pdf, 392 KB]

   ...previously claimed. Note, the completion fee can only be claimed via a final invoice after disposal and where an interim fee has previously been claimed. Completion Fee – Disposed at Defended Hearing $300 $340 $350 Additional Fixed Fees Applications for Bail, Name Suppression, Media Coverage, Electronic Bail Monitoring Activity A B C Tasks covered by Fixed Fee Opposed application(s) for Bail, Name Suppression $225 For:  Taking instructions, attending the client �...

2. TB v TN & LN [2024] NZDT 50 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 50 APPLICANT TB RESPONDENT TN SECOND RESPONDENT LN The Tribunal orders: LN is ordered to pay TB the sum of $3,114.19. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 28 March 2024. Reasons: 1) On 10 March 2023, a collision occurred resulting in damage to the applicant’s car. This was in the applicant’s...

3. FL v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 248 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 248 APPLICANT FL RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 October 2021, FL contracted C Ltd to make 6 bridesmaid dresses to a single design for $250.00 plus GST each. The bridesmaids each paid for their own dress. 2. The contract required each bridesmaid to provide her me...

4. BI & SI v BA [2023] NZDT 142 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 154 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 142 APPLICANT BI APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT BA The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is not proven and therefore dismissed. Reasons: 1. The Applicants are claiming $21,030.00 which they say is the amount that they paid to the Respondent in three cash payments (21 July 2015- $12,000.00, 27 J...

5. KH v KN [2022] NZDT 241 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 241 APPLICANT KH APPLICANT YM RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay KH and YM the amount of $3,153.40 on or before 16 January 2023. Reason 1. On 15 February 2022 the applicants entered into an agreement to purchase the respondent’s property in [suburb]. The property consisted of 3 separate dwe...

6. Mhatre v Gokhale [2017] NZIACDT 13 (29 August 2017) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...different views as to the facts. The Registrar set out her view of the facts in the statement of complaint, it is relatively uncomplicated: [1.1] On 19 September 2016, the complainant engaged the adviser to lodge a partnership-based temporary visa application on his behalf. A written agreement of 27 September 2016 provided terms for the professional engagement. The complainant’s partner was in New Zealand studying, and nearing a point where she would be seeking a work visa so th...

7. KB & Ors v TC & RV [2023] NZDT 634 (25 September 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...became unconditional. None of these dates were expressly specified on the contract and cannot be ascertained from the document itself as it is undated. The contract never became unconditional, therefore the $30,000.00 deposit was not paid. 4. The Applicants’ claim states the contract was signed on 29 July 2021, however the correspondence indicates that it was 2022. At the hearing, the Applicants confirmed it was 2022. 5. The Applicants claim that as a result of the failure of...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 95 Kingipotiki v Taplin [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...TRUSTEES OF THE I M TAPLIN FARMING TRUST [2022] NZEmpC 95 [30 May 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 169/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an ex-parte application for a freezing order BETWEEN LISA KINGIPOTIKI First Applicant AND JASON KINGIPOTIKI Second Applicant AND DARREN COLLINS Third Applicant AND AMANDA POTROZ Fourth Applicant...

9. D Ltd v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 190 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 168 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 190 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: L Ltd is to pay $13,479.63 to D Ltd on or before 30 May 2023. Reasons 1. L Ltd, as head contractor on a large construction job, contracted D Ltd to provide foundation works (materials and labour) to the [Address] site. 2. The...

10. AEL Ltd v ZVL [2012] NZDT 310 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 43 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 310 BETWEEN AEL LTD APPLICANT AND ZVL RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 April 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVL, pay the amount of $312.57 to the Applicant, AEL Ltd, on or before 27 April 2012. Facts [1] The Applicant claims $506.93 in respect of plumbing services rendered to the R...