Search Results

1. A J Ball Family Trust [2012] NZWHT Auckland 37 [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...relevant. [8] Lang J also considered the effect of s43(1) of the Building Act 1991 which provides as follows: 43 Code compliance certificate (1) An owner shall as soon as practicable advise the territorial authority, in the prescribed form, that the building work has been completed to the extent required by the building consent issued in respect of that building work. [9] He concluded that if this reasoning is applied to the consideration of the built-by date u...

2. EB v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 328 (21 May 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 328 APPLICANT EB RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons Background [1] EB, represented by his son KB, after having suffered earthquake damage to his house during 2010- 2012, reached a cash settlement with his insurer, T Ltd, represented by MG. Subsequently, in [case citation redacted] the Court of Appea...

3. A Q v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 76 (23 June 2015) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...aspect of the complaint is that Mr Mudaliar had an agreement with the complainant for the original application, but did not do anything to establish the professional engagement for the two section 61 requests. [2] Mr Mudaliar did take issue with the claim he failed to notify the complainant when the second section 61 request failed; but otherwise has not challenged the allegations in a specific way. The Tribunal has accordingly examined the material to establish the facts, and then consi...

4. BN & IN v X Ltd [2021] NZDT 1616 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...20/4/2007 Policy documents (including special terms an and an updated quote for the 250% loading) were sent to BN and IN for signing, which BN and IN did. 24/4/2007 The policy was issued. 24/4/2014 BN calls X Ltd to update his address details and requests a quote to reduce the cover to retain the current premium. 28/4/2014 X Ltd send a quote to BN to reduce life cover. This is not returned or discussed. 24/4/2015 BN calls X Ltd to express his unhappiness at the increasing premium...

5. MC v OJ Ltd [2020] NZDT 1490 (31 October 2020) [pdf, 109 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1490 APPLICANT MC RESPONDENT OJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. OJ Ltd is to pay MC the sum of $4,495.00 on or before 4 November 2020. 2. The counter claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 2 March 2020 MC enrolled in a course to become a Personal Trainer run by OJ Ltd. The course was due to commence on 23 March with an i...

6. EQ & KQ v S Ltd [2024] NZDT 606 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...initially claimed the sum of $30,000.00 for remedial work, replacement of the califont and legal fees. However, between the first and second hearing both parties carried out work on the property, and the landscaping was completed as passed by Council. The applicants now reduce their claim accordingly. 3. S Ltd attended the first but not the second hearing. The absence of a party does not prevent a claim from going ahead. 4. The issues to be determined are as follows: a. Was the c...

7. BQ v KE [2021] NZDT 1538 (22 January 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...there was not sufficient time for that claim to be processed and heard with this one. Consequently, it will have to be heard as a separate claim at a later date. Referee: K Rendall Date: 22 January 2021 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. Stewart v Eru - Succession to Teressa Ivor Silcock (2020) 200 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 (200 WMN 184) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...land interests. (f) A fixture was set down to hear the application at Hamilton on 20 August 2019. (g) On 13 August 2019, counsel for Ms Nicola Silcock advised that she had filed a Family Protection Act claim in the Whangārei Family Court and requested that the succession application be adjourned until the Family Court proceedings were determined. I declined this adjournment application as I considered that the question of whether the respondent is entitled to succeed under the...

9. UH v QT Ltd [2024] NZDT 115 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 115 APPLICANT UH RESPONDENT QT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. UH is to pay $93.00 to QT Ltd by 30 April 2024. 2. UH is not liable for any other amount that QT Ltd has claimed from him in regard Vehicle Registration [redacted] and the [company’s reference]. Note: QT Ltd was not represented at the hearing. QT Ltd was grante...

10. MU v QT Ltd [2024] NZDT 210 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

    Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 210 APPLICANT MU RESPONDENT QT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QT Ltd is to pay MU $95.00 on or before 4 April 2024 2. MU is not liable to pay QT Ltd $615.00 for infringement fees or additional costs relating to breach notices issued on 28 April 2023 or 3 May 2023. Reasons 1. MU’s son drives a [car] [registration number] which is owned a...