12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1353 APPLICANT DT AND BY EMAIL RESPONDENT BJ Limited Attn: KC AND BY EMAIL The Tribunal hereby orders: BJ Limited is to pay DT $19,800 on or before 21 February 2019. Reasons 1. DT is insured with BJ. On 28 June 2017, she filed a claim with BJ in relation to the theft of her car, a 2008 [Car] which...
...SECOND RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out under section 19(1)(h)(i) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 as no reasonable cause of action against these respondents has been presented. Reasons 1. JA claims $20,521.45, being money that she had invested in term deposits with a company, [Investment Company] Limited, which then went into receivership on 1 April 2020 and into liquidation on 24 July 2020. 2. KQ and BT were directors of [Investm...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 182 APPLICANT E Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT MN as trustee of NC Family Trust SECOND RESPONDENT OC The Tribunal orders: MN is to pay directly to E Ltd the sum of $12,062.35 on or before Thursday, 18 April 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant se...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 146 BETWEEN ACT APPLICANT AND ZXI Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZXH Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 June 2011 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the matter is transferred to the District Court under s 36(2) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 as a claim for exemplary damages is more properly determined in a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 270 APPLICANT IS RESPONDENT TM The Tribunal orders: TM is to pay IS the sum of $3,110.00 on or before 15 June 2023. Reasons: 1. IS moved into a flat with TM and other flatmates in November 2020. She paid a bond to TM who was the head tenant. They did not have a written sharing agreement, however, IS understood that...
...AND ZWJ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 27 March 2013 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out. [1] From 30 November 2012, the Applicants owned a house where ADR lived and rented a room to ZWJ. They claimed that ZWJ left without notice and owed money for unpaid rent; the time her boyfriend stayed in the property; outgoings (water, electricity and telephone); damage t...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2009] NZDT 554 BETWEEN AGP APPLICANT AND ZTZ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 23 November 2009 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is transferred to the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal at Auckland. [1] In January 2003, AGP purchased a new Peugeot 307 motor vehicle from ZTZ Ltd. In 2009, the automatic transmission...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1374 APPLICANT MB RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ engaged employment advocacy firm [Firm] to act for her in an employment dispute. At the time that contract was formed MB was contracting to [Firm] and became NQ’s advocate. 2. NQ’s dispute was to go to mediatio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 456 APPLICANT LE RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by LE against T Ltd is struck out because the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim. REASONS 1. The Applicant, LE, sought family mediation services through [The Centre] regarding a dispute with her ex-partner. The Centre provides mediation services...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 367 APPLICANT KL RESPONDENT SH The Tribunal orders: SH is to pay KL the sum of $150.00 on or before 5 July 2023. Reasons: 1. KL purchased a car from SH. At the time of purchase the car had some money owing on it, and a security interest registered to [bank]. 2. The parties agreed that SH would use the proceed...