Search Results

1. CU v MQ [2024] NZDT 299 (30 April 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...[2024] NZDT 299 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT MQ The Tribunal orders: Claim MQ is to pay CU $115.00 within 28 days. Counterclaim The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons [1] CU sold a number of items on [platform], and inadvertently provided MQ’s bank account number to buyers. The buyers paid a total of $ 474.50 into MQ’s account. At CU’s request, after learning of the errors, MQ paid $300.00 to CU. CU claims the balance of $174.50, as well as $...

2. Manchester Securities Limited [2013] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...final inspection (other than in a trivial way), then it will not be “built” for eligibility purposes until it has passed its final inspection. Any exceptions to this approach are likely to be rare but might include, for example, a case where a request for the final inspection has been unduly delayed and there is clear evidence that the dwelling house was built to the extent required by the building consent prior to that date. 3 [15] The 12th floor apartment owned by Manchest...

3. D Ltd v KG [2024] NZDT 323 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...in his fibreglass over ply boat and asked for a quote from the applicant to remedy. The applicant advised that it appeared the boat had suffered some impact damage and estimated $2,000 to repair the leak. [3] The applicant advised respondent to inform his insurer and he did so. The insurer, J Ltd, agreed to cover the repair.1 The respondent completed the repair and invoiced the applicant $2,346.00. This amount was paid by the respondent to the applicant. The respondent was later reimburse...

4. FH & EN v KS & G Ltd [2024] NZDT 756 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...standards (guarantees) into contracts where goods and services are supplied in trade to consumers. Relevant here is the guarantee under section 6 CGA which requires that supplied goods be of an acceptable quality. Section 7 CGA provides further information about what acceptable quality means, including examples like, goods must be fit for a purpose for which they are commonly supplied; be acceptable in appearance and finish; and be free from minor defects. 6. Having considered all th...

5. LC v Q Ltd [2025] NZDT 94 (26 May 2025) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...person may be liable, not the vehicle itself or its owner. b. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal is provided for in sections 10 and 11 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 and does not include the power to require that one party disclose/provide information to another party. 9. For completeness, I record that I have considered Q Ltd saying that it believed the driver was acting as an agent of LC, however I do not find it reasonable to believe this for either contract or trespass. In...

6. McConachy v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal injury) [2024] NZACC 113 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...3. High grade, almost full thickness supraspinatus tear. 4. Subscapularis mid fibre low grade partial articular surface tear. 5. Moderate AC joint arthropathy. [7] On 8 March 2021, Mr Ian Penny, Orthopaedic Surgeon, lodged a surgery funding request for left shoulder arthroscopy, spinoglenoid notch ganglion debridement, labral debridement, decompression including co-plane AC joint and tendon repair if necessary. 3 [8] On 3 May 2021, the Corporation added cover to Ms McCona...

7. Employment Court forms & fees

   ...2025.  Please let registry know if you will have difficulty paying the filing and/or hearing fees - you can apply for a waiver. On this page: Information about fees in the Employment Court Ways to file documents and pay filing fee Information about forms in the Employment Court Frequently used forms Other forms Forms used when serving a defendant overseas (other than in Australia) Forms for a case involving a defendant in Australia (and the Trans-Tasman Proceeding Act 2010 Applies If you...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court

8. EMPC Form 1 - Example statement of claim regarding ERA determination [pdf, 408 KB]

   r 7(l) Form 1 [EXAMPLE ONLY] Under the Employment Relations Act 2000 In the Employment Court No: / Wellington Registry Election to have matter heard in the Employment Court Between Jane Smith. of 21 Example Street Central City Wellington Plaintiff And Joe Bloggs of 22 Example Street Central City Wellington First Defendant And The Joe Bloggs Company Limited of 23 Example Street Central Ci...

9. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy principles in that the defendants wrongly refused access to personal information requested by Mr Rafiq (HRRT040/2011). [2.2] Principles 1-4 and Principle 11 in that the investigations into whether Mr Rafiq was a fit and proper person to hold a pilot licence and whether he had committed offences under the Civil Aviation...

10. CW & NK v TX [2023] NZDT 411 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...to be resolved are: a. Is TX in breach of the agreement for sale and purchase? b. Are NK and CW entitled to $2,070.00 as claimed, or to any other sum? Is TX in breach of the Agreement? 5. Under contract law, a legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms and intend for those terms to be legally binding. The terms of a contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end, and what was agreed is looked at objectively, i.e., by looking at