12520 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 339 APPLICANT HL RESPONDENT UB APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) K Ltd The Tribunal orders: UB is ordered to pay K Ltd the sum of $9,957.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 31 July 2024. The first $1,200.00 received by K Ltd from the respondent will be paid to the applicant, HL...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2009] NZDT 554 BETWEEN AGP APPLICANT AND ZTZ Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 23 November 2009 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is transferred to the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal at Auckland. [1] In January 2003, AGP purchased a new Peugeot 307 motor vehicle from ZTZ Ltd. In 2009, the automatic transmission...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 762 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Someone posing as CX advertised a [mobile phone] on Trade Me. LB purchased the [mobile phone] on 29 December 2022 for $850.00 and paid $870.00 into the bank account provided. 2. The goods failed to arrive and the seller initially gave as...
...form Audit Results and Practice Themes Clarification for duty lawyer travel Criminal fixed fee review – third set of changes Duty Lawyer Travel - policy change Pre-approved Judge directed drug testing in family cases Update – New Criminal legal aid application form now available on Baseline New criminal legal aid application form Update - Substance Addiction (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017 Applications Changes to legal aid provider audit and monitoring policy Criminal fixed f...
...for those works, and G Ltd also incurred iron plate rental charges to 22 February 2022 totalling $4,975.00. G Ltd paid $224,771.50 in total, but refused to pay the balance because its client’s quantity surveyor disputed the volume of earthworks claimed. G Ltd also queries whether some material was dumped illegally. H Ltd now claims the balance of $26,297.50 plus interest. 2. The issues to be determined are: a) Did H Ltd breach any contractual obligation regarding dumping requirements...
...dissatisfaction and the fact that it was taking their workers a significant amount of time to travel to and from the job site in [town]. 3. G Ltd invoiced $4592.81 incl.GST for the hours worked and JC has paid a total of $1906.00, leaving a balance claimed of $2686.81. 4. JC says he was dismayed by the quality of G Ltd’s workers’ work from the outset and raised it with the workers directly and with his son over the course of the first week. He says he paid $1906.00 based on his...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court - [2022] NZDT 136 APPLICANT IH RESPONDENT LM The Tribunal orders: 1. The respondent’s address is changed to [Address] 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant IH owns [Address]. The respondent LM is one of the two trustees of the M & P Family Trust who purchased the adjacent [Address] although he says that the ti...
...challenge is set down for hearing on 14-16 July 2014. Any stay will require the fixture to be vacated. [2] In its application, the defendant seeks: a) An order that the proceedings be stayed until the Official Assignee evaluates the merits of the claim and confirms whether or not the manner in which it is likely to be advanced is correct. b) In the event that the remedies sought under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 1 (the Act) are determined by th...
...signed a sale and purchase agreement for a car. KT says his ability to purchase the car was dependent on his parents helping him finance it. He was unable to secure the finance he needed, and the next day he phoned F Ltd to cancel the contract and request the return of the deposit. F Ltd declined to provide a refund. 2. KT claims the sum of $500.00 for the return of his deposit. The issue to be determined is whether KT is entitled to a refund of the deposit. 3. A deposit is a sur...
...$13,291.59 for repairs to the retaining wall ($9,830.20), the repairs to the fence ($4,378.60 (1/2 the total cost)) and repairs to the garage floor ($792.87). Also claimed is 10% on the total of $13,294.59 is the cost of inflation over the last year. The applicants seek a further $5,000 for compensation for stress suffered. 3. The following issues are to be determined: a) What are the relevant terms of the insurance policy? b) Is the damage and repairs to the retaining wall, fenc...