12527 items matching your search terms
...admissibility hearing Activity A B C Tasks covered by Fixed Fee Pre-trial admissibility hearing $225 For: Taking instructions, attending the client Receiving and reviewing disclosure Identifying legal and factual issues Preparing application Liaising with other agencies Attending hearing/s Receiving decision Any agent fees Reporting to client. Schedules A–J — July 2013 3 Activity A B C Tasks covered by Fixed Fee Pre...
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 218 EMPC 25/2023 EMPC 111/2023 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CARRINGTON RESORT JADE LP Plaintiff AND PAULA KNIGHT Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: W Tan, agent for plaintiff R Mark, counsel for defendant Judgment:...
...Rehua Ngāti Wai ki Aotea Trust Board (the Trust Board), who is the respondent in this matter. [2] A judicial conference was held on 15 April 2019. Following this, parties were directed to file written submissions and evidence supporting their claims with the Court. Ms Bayne filed submissions on 25 April 2019. Submissions from the Trust Board were received on 13 June 2019, followed by submissions in reply from the applicant on 14 July 2019. [3] The Crown has maintained a watching b...
...defendant contends that its members who are piece-rate workers are not being provided with paid rest breaks, in contravention of s 69ZD of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act).1 [4] The defendant pleads that the plaintiffs require work to be performed during breaks in the form of “doffing and stowing and sterilizing equipment and gear and donning such equipment and gear for use”. [5] That allegation is pleaded by the defendant in support of its contention that the pl...
...FIRST APPLICANT AND AGK SECOND APPLICANT AND ZVL RESPONDENT Date of Order: 18 December 2013 Referee: Referee Costigan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim by AGJ and AGK is dismissed. AGJ and AGK are jointly and severally liable to pay ZVL the sum of $793.20 on or before 31 December 2013. Facts [1] AGJ and AGK live at 34 [place name street]. They say ZVL, their neighbour at 36 [pla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 633 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay BN $468.90 on or before the 27 November 2023. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. BN purchased a [sewing machine] and as part of the purchase price paid postage. When the sewing machine arrived, it was damaged. It was return...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 558 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) ED RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) G Council The Tribunal orders: Both claims are struck out. Reasons 1. ED’s claim is for $29,949.00 which he says are the costs incurred by him in pursuing a resource consent subdivision application. These costs included surveyors an...
...SECOND RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out under section 19(1)(h)(i) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 as no reasonable cause of action against these respondents has been presented. Reasons 1. JA claims $20,521.45, being money that she had invested in term deposits with a company, [Investment Company] Limited, which then went into receivership on 1 April 2020 and into liquidation on 24 July 2020. 2. KQ and BT were directors of [Investm...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 182 APPLICANT E Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT MN as trustee of NC Family Trust SECOND RESPONDENT OC The Tribunal orders: MN is to pay directly to E Ltd the sum of $12,062.35 on or before Thursday, 18 April 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant se...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1374 APPLICANT MB RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ engaged employment advocacy firm [Firm] to act for her in an employment dispute. At the time that contract was formed MB was contracting to [Firm] and became NQ’s advocate. 2. NQ’s dispute was to go to mediatio...