Search Results

1. OIA-119305.pdf [pdf, 199 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 27 February 2025 Ref: OIA 119305 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Judicial Conduct Thank you for your email of 5 January 2025, to the Office of the Minister of Justice, Hon Paul Goldsmith requesting under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information about the Judicial Conduct Commissioner and the Judicial Conduct Panel...

2. Body Corporate 180379 and Unit Owners of Fox Terrace Apartments v Auckland Council procedural order [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...OWNERS OF FOX TERRACE APARTMENTS Claimant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL AND OTHERS Respondents PROCEDURAL ORDER 6 (Determination in respect of Unit F) Dated 20 July 2011 1. The Council has applied for a determination that the claims in respect of Unit B and Unit F are statute barred pursuant to section 393 of the Building Act 2004. This order relates only to Unit F. It is appropriate to deal with the applications in respect of Unit B and Unit F separately beca...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 19 Restaurant Brands Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...LIMITED v UNITE INCORPORATED [2021] NZEmpC 19 [4 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 19 EMPC 164/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declaration – strike, lockout or picket AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out parts of the statement of claim BETWEEN RESTAURANT BRANDS LIMITED Plaintiff AND UNITE INCORPORAT...

4. QQ v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 29 (16 April 2025) [pdf, 133 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 29 APPLICANT QQ RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The Applicant and Respondent claims for costs and repairs are dismissed. 2. S Ltd is to return to QQ the Speedometer on or before Thursday 8th May 2025. Reasons: 1. This claim and counter claim were scheduled before me on 1 April 2025 via teleconference. 2. The A...

5. ABI v ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) [2010] NZDT 82 (30 September 2010) [pdf, 10 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2010] NZDT 82 BETWEEN ABI APPLICANT AND ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 September 2010 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim against ZYU Ltd (in liquidation) is dismissed. [1] The hearing on 20 September 2010 was attended by ABI and KL, who was a director of ZY...

6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 13 [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...Maori and Crown. However, there was dispute over the reasons for the lack of distribution of funds; whether it was the fault of the Act, the deed, or the trustees at fault (although it was noted that a major problem appears to be the complicated application form). An affidavit by B P Quinn, who has been closely involved in the Crown forestry asset sale in 1988 and ensuing negotiations, supported the view that the trust deed is not consistent with certain principles agreed in the origi�...

7. O Ltd v CD & Ors [2024] NZDT 854 (18 October 2024) [pdf, 279 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 854 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT CD SECOND RESPONDENT H Ltd THIRD RESPONDENT NY Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. O Ltd had a contract with D Ltd to form a right- of-way across the [Holiday Park] to the beach. O Ltd carried out the work in 2022. 2. O Ltd’s claim alleges that when it was...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 102 Rachelle v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 460 KB]

   ...[2018] NZEmpC 102 [6 September 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2018] NZEmpC 102 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further and better particulars BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Rachelle, plaintiff in person A Cai...

9. CEIT Homeowners Guide [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...any of the conferences or hearings. • Again, this person can be anyone you choose – a friend, colleague or family member. 2 About this guide In this guide we explain how the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal works from the time an application is made to the time it is resolved. We want everybody involved to know what to expect as they participate in the process. There are five parts: 1. Who can apply – this is the first step in the process, and this section lets you...

10. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 298 KB]

    ...BOYS 30 November 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] This decision is about whether the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and Tower Insurance Limited (Tower) may be removed from this claim due to an application under s 11 of the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (the Act) bringing the matter to an end. [2] On 27 August 2021, the Tribunal found that EQC’s decision to decline claims for damage from the...