Search Results

1. MD v D Ltd [2019] NZDT 1513 (12 August 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...claim, MD emailed the Tribunal to advise that a payment of $2,500.00 had been received from DL that morning reducing the amount claimed to $5,343.00 plus interest. [3] I have to decide: (a) who the parties to the contract were; (b) whether DL performed its obligations under its contract with MD; (c) if MD was entitled to cancel the contract; and (d) whether DL is liable to pay the whole or any part of the amount claimed. [4] The applicable law is the law of contract and the Co...

2. HK v F Ltd [2024] NZDT 698 (7 November 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...component and it would be reasonable to expect there would be several other components connecting to that part. The claim under the manufacturer’s warranty must therefore fail. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 8. HK also stated the warranty information was misleading. However I find that claim has not been proven. HK agreed the warranty was stated to be on the inverter motor only. Although HK thought this related to the inner workings of the machine, he did not seek clarity...

3. NB v NF Ltd [2022] NZDT 143 (11 August 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...to might be unfair on one party. 16. This means that NB has not established her claim for a refund of the deposit paid and her claim is dismissed. Referee: R Merrett Date: 11 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. EQ v ND Ltd & DQ [2023] NZDT 9 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...contracted the Tribunal and again requested an adjournment on the basis that he was out of country and not reachable over the phone as he was in a remote area and the phone and internet is very limited. An adjournment was not granted. The Tribunal informed DQ that the hearing would proceed. [5] Whereas DQ advised that he made the latest adjournment request a week prior to his travel asking that the hearing be adjourned till 2023, the evidence is clear that DQ left the county knowing that...

5. L Ltd v UT [2022] NZDT 266 (16 December 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...pay the sum of $850.00 to L Ltd on or before Monday 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. On 1 August 2022, UT (the customer) signed a six-month Membership Agreement with L Ltd (the gym). The membership fee was $170.00 per month. The customer signed a form to pay by direct debit, but the account number provided was incorrect. The gym claims that no payment has ever been received, and the customer has neither attended the gym nor cancelled her membership. 2. The gym now claims $935.00, intend...

6. TG v E Ltd [2024] NZDT 289 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...October 2021 for substantial renovations to the applicant’s home. The contract was terminated by the applicant in July 2022 before the works were completed. TG’s written submissions provide full detail of her dissatisfaction with E Ltd’s performance. The claim 5. Generally, TG says that a project cost blowout occurred and was caused by E Ltd and its lack of financial transparency. Due to that she has refused to pay E Ltd’s two final invoices ($24,890.65) and seeks a decl...

7. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...February 2024, agreed to wait a further six weeks for the delivery of a replacement bed package based on M Ltd advising that was how long it would take. After 10 weeks, MQ and EI contacted M Ltd inquiring as to where the bed package was. They were informed it was on a container and there was no delivery date provided. In mid-April MQ and EI contacted M Ltd and advised if they could not provide a delivery date then they wanted a refund. M Ltd at first asked for an extension to 31 May 2024 t...

8. TQ IQ v ZC [2021] NZDT 1704 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...payable in additional to actual additional expenses. 13. Based on the findings above, ZC is to pay $1173.00 + $361.00 + $100.00 to TQ and IQ, being $1634.00. Referee Perfect Date: 10 December 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

9. EC v UU [2025] NZDT 43 (1 April 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...that an order has been issued the respondent can contract the insurer and see if any of the instalment plans or discounts offered still stand. Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 01 April 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. NI v FI & MI & GI [2023] NZDT 592 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...respondents damaged the aircraft when moving it, and as they are not responsible for any deterioration after it was delivered to NI’s shed, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 13 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...