Search Results

1. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...BOYS 30 November 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] This decision is about whether the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and Tower Insurance Limited (Tower) may be removed from this claim due to an application under s 11 of the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (the Act) bringing the matter to an end. [2] On 27 August 2021, the Tribunal found that EQC’s decision to decline claims for damage from the...

2. CEIT Homeowners Guide [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...any of the conferences or hearings. • Again, this person can be anyone you choose – a friend, colleague or family member. 2 About this guide In this guide we explain how the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal works from the time an application is made to the time it is resolved. We want everybody involved to know what to expect as they participate in the process. There are five parts: 1. Who can apply – this is the first step in the process, and this section lets you...

3. TD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 761 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 761 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal declares and orders: 1. The claim by Q Ltd for TD to pay $536.00 is dismissed. 2. The claim by TD for reimbursement of her filing fee is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TD has applied for an order that she is not liable to pay Q Ltd for a parking breach notice and collection costs ($395.00). Her cl...

4. LS & NA v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 635 (25 November 2024) [pdf, 167 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 635 APPLICANT LS and NA RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NA parked in a parking area for customers of her GP practice when she had a doctor’s appointment on the morning of 23 July 2024. When she returned to her car after her appointment, she found that it would not start. She contacted her...

5. UC and NT Family Trust v TT Ltd [2020] NZDT 1497 (11 August 2020) [pdf, 137 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1497 APPLICANT UC and NT Family Trust (trustees UC and NT) RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC and NT (trustees of The UC and the NT Family Trust (Trust)) is claiming $4,063.74 being: a. $346.75 for balance of rental they say was owing at Covid -19 Level 3 b. $20.60 (

6. DN v C Ltd & D Ltd [2023] NZDT 283 (12 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...point, I place little weight on K’s evidence. He has not attended the hearing and it is equally likely that he told his boss what he wanted to hear, that is that he followed protocol in inspecting the vehicle prior to the hirer as he did not, as claimed by the applicant. [12] Further the photographs provided are of little benefit. They are not dated and despite careful inspection I can see not sign of damage. I accept a highly qualified professional may recognise some damage in the s...

7. BB Ltd OD Ltd v ED Ltd [2019] NZDT 1532 (18 December 2019) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...APPLICANT BB Limited APPLICANT OD Limited RESPONDENT ED Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: ED Limited is to deliver the Toyota Prius to OD Limited on or before Wednesday 15 January 2020. Reasons: 1. The applicants are in the business of supplying vehicles to motor vehicle dealers along with finance for those vehicles. From time to time OD Limited supplied TD Limited with vehicles under the terms of a Vehicle Supply and Security Agreement (Sec...

8. EU v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 181 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 181 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT G Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant claims compensation after his vehicle suffered damaging traveling on a portion of [highwa...

9. FN v PL [2023] NZDT 681 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 681 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT PL The Tribunal orders: PL is to pay $400.00 to FN on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons 1. FN and PL were formerly friends/friendly acquaintances. FN says that in 2022 he loaned $400 to PL, paying it to him via internet banking payment around August 2022. The loan amount was repaid by PL the next day....

10. SU v WC [2022] NZDT 215 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 215 APPLICANT SU RESPONDENT WC The Tribunal orders: WC is to pay SU the sum of $2,755.32 on or by 16 December 2022. Reasons 1. SU brings a claim against WC for $2,755.32 in relation to work that WC commenced but did not complete for the construction of footings and floor for a garage. 2. The parties were advis...