12527 items matching your search terms
...APPLICANT EQ APPLICANT KE APPLICANT NL APPLICANT NN APPLICANT OL APPLICANT TO APPLICANT TS APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT NB The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicants are the trustees of the II, which trades as QC Ltd. QC Ltd tried to help NB with some debts including mortgage debts after his business failed and his marriage ended in 2013. In 2016, QC Ltd closed his file because it objected to NB...
...info@justice.govt.nz W www.justice.govt.nz http://www.justice.govt.nz/ iii Contents Duty lawyer service 4 Introduction 4 Appointment as a duty lawyer 4 Authority for the service 4 Glossary 4 Responsibilities of duty lawyers 5 Applications for criminal legal aid 6 Attendance requirements 6 Supervision of the duty lawyer service 7 Payment 8 Travel time and mileage 9 Specific arrangements at courts with PDS Supervisors 10 Removal from the duty lawyer roster...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 299 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT MQ The Tribunal orders: Claim MQ is to pay CU $115.00 within 28 days. Counterclaim The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons [1] CU sold a number of items on [platform], and inadvertently provided MQ’s bank account number to buyers. The buyers paid a total of $ 474.50 into MQ’s account. A...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1531 APPLICANT SE RESPONDENTS TD and KF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SE owns the property next to TD and KF. In 2013, TD and KF moved a shed that straddled the boundary of the two properties. After moving the structure, its concrete foundations remained. Although SE expected...
...of $2000 is appropriate in view of the deliberateness of the actions and the lack of consent. 22. I make no award against UT as she did not trespass on to DS’s lane or damage any of her property. 23. I am unable to award the $180 costs claimed by DS under the Disputes Tribunal Act. 24. The amount awarded above is made up as follows: Value of tree $4,000.00 Arborist costs 1,000.00 Fence panels 160.00 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 Clematis 60.00 Loss of ameni...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 683 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: The applicant did not appear to present the claim and the claim is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Reasons 1. Q Ltd claim that they suffered losses in the course of their application process to U Ltd and R Ltd for [The Accreditat...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 254 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT JJ The Tribunal orders: 1. The Respondent shall pay the Applicant $11,000.00 by 8 June 2023. 2. The Respondent shall collect the vehicle from the Applicant by arrangement, within 5 working after payment has been made in full. If the vehicle is not collected in that time, the Applicant may dispose of the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 668 APPLICANT BV RESPONDENT JU The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. JU did not attend the hearing and did not provide any defence to the claim. The absence of a party does not prevent the hearing from proceeding. Section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act provides that where the case...
...able to increase the half hourly rates for hearings and meeting time, except for parole, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, which will be included in the 2018 fee schedules. Other matters: a. fees available when cases are reassigned – you requested that both providers be able to claim all the fees in a schedule b. fees for co-counsel – you requested that counsel and co-counsel be able to claim all the same fees in a schedule, particularly in cases where there are co-accused...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 222 APPLICANT NC and DC RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is to pay NC and DC $3100.25 on or before 5pm on 19 June 2023. 2. HG is struck off this claim. Reasons 1. The first hearing was adjourned. After that hearing, T Ltd and HG contacted the Tribunal and request