Search Results

1. TG v E Ltd [2024] NZDT 289 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...October 2021 for substantial renovations to the applicant’s home. The contract was terminated by the applicant in July 2022 before the works were completed. TG’s written submissions provide full detail of her dissatisfaction with E Ltd’s performance. The claim 5. Generally, TG says that a project cost blowout occurred and was caused by E Ltd and its lack of financial transparency. Due to that she has refused to pay E Ltd’s two final invoices ($24,890.65) and seeks a decl...

2. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...February 2024, agreed to wait a further six weeks for the delivery of a replacement bed package based on M Ltd advising that was how long it would take. After 10 weeks, MQ and EI contacted M Ltd inquiring as to where the bed package was. They were informed it was on a container and there was no delivery date provided. In mid-April MQ and EI contacted M Ltd and advised if they could not provide a delivery date then they wanted a refund. M Ltd at first asked for an extension to 31 May 2024 t...

3. NI v FI & MI & GI [2023] NZDT 592 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...respondents damaged the aircraft when moving it, and as they are not responsible for any deterioration after it was delivered to NI’s shed, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 13 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

4. X Ltd v II [2021] NZDT 1539 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1539 APPLICANT X Limited (formerly Q Limited) RESPONDENT II SECOND RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: II and BI are liable to pay $7,536.78 to X Limited in respect of the claim. X Limited is liable to pay $4,492.88 to II and BI in respect of the counter claim. After the amount of $4,492.88 payable by X Limited

5. M Ltd v AAI [2023] NZDT 578 (11 August 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 578 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT AAI The Tribunal orders: AAI is to pay the sum of $8,000.00 to M Ltd on or before Monday 28 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In August 2021, AAI submitted a Consignment Quote Request form to M Ltd for a [designer purse]. The form stated, “We only sell authentic items.” He shipped the purse to M Ltd in [Country]. M Ltd received the purse in September 2021, and an artificial intelligence-enabled authenticatio...

6. BC v TH Ltd [2024] NZDT 658 (16 August 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 16 August 2024 3 I understand the applicant’s submission that like for like batteries are not available. Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

7. HG v ET [2020] NZDT 1411 (1 July 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...against BW is withdrawn. Reasons CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 1. On 23 January 2020, four vehicles were involved in a nose-to-tail incident on [highway]. 2. At the point where the incident occurred, a stationary queue of traffic had formed on the road. HG, driving a [car], (referred to as “Driver A”) arrived at this queue, and was able to stop short to avoid hitting the car in front of him. However, ET, who was driving a car owned by IK of TQ Ltd, was travelling b...

8. QN v CI & EN [2024] NZDT 472 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 472 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT CI SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: 1. EN is to pay QN $4,999.00 on or before 25 June 2024. 2. The claim against CI is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QN lent her son, EN, $5,000.00 in March 2023 for the purchase of a car. The car was purchased, and registered in the name of EN’s partner, CI. Two or three months later EN and CI separated, a...

9. BV v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 677 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...has anyone who might drive the vehicle had their driving licence suspended or cancelled, or had a special condition added to their licence? [3] The policy was renewed each subsequent year. At the beginning of each renewal period, the same renewal form was provided to BV. He did not alter the form, and the word “no” remained as his answer to the question stated above. On 3 November 2023, BV was involved in a crash while driving the vehicle, which was not economical to repair. He clai...

10. Tane-Stockler - Estate of Tanetinorau Opataia (2003) 122 Otorohanga MB 3 (122 OT 3) [pdf, 728 KB]

    ...whenua trust. Section 215(8)/93 states that an ahu whenua trust shall not affect any persons[sic] entitlement to succeed to any beneficial interest in any land vested in trustees for the purposes of a trust. Therefore, it is clear that the formation of this trust, which is still in force for Hauturu East 8, does not affect a person's entitlement to succeed. Accordingly, we are of the clear view that succession can take place in respect to Hauturu East 8 Block and as a c...