Search Results

1. EC & KC v CT & ZR [2022] NZDT 190 (17 October 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...settlement and after 2 contractors had intervened. 30. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the claim has not been proven and must be dismissed. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 17 October 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

2. L Ltd v UT [2022] NZDT 266 (16 December 2022) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...pay the sum of $850.00 to L Ltd on or before Monday 16 January 2023. Reasons: 1. On 1 August 2022, UT (the customer) signed a six-month Membership Agreement with L Ltd (the gym). The membership fee was $170.00 per month. The customer signed a form to pay by direct debit, but the account number provided was incorrect. The gym claims that no payment has ever been received, and the customer has neither attended the gym nor cancelled her membership. 2. The gym now claims $935.00, intend...

3. NB v NF Ltd [2022] NZDT 143 (11 August 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...to might be unfair on one party. 16. This means that NB has not established her claim for a refund of the deposit paid and her claim is dismissed. Referee: R Merrett Date: 11 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. EQ v ND Ltd & DQ [2023] NZDT 9 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...contracted the Tribunal and again requested an adjournment on the basis that he was out of country and not reachable over the phone as he was in a remote area and the phone and internet is very limited. An adjournment was not granted. The Tribunal informed DQ that the hearing would proceed. [5] Whereas DQ advised that he made the latest adjournment request a week prior to his travel asking that the hearing be adjourned till 2023, the evidence is clear that DQ left the county knowing that...

5. Davis v Hussey & Ors (Strike Out) [2025] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 194 KB]

   1 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1 1 This decision is to be cited as Davis v Hussey & Ors (Strike Out) [2025] NZHRRT 28. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 28 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 031/2023 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN ARTEMIS INDIGO DELILAH DAVIS PLAINTIFF AND SARAH LESS HUSSEY FIRST DEFENDANT AND BATH STREET TAP ROOM LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: J Foster, Deputy Chairp

6. DX v KD & I Ltd [2025] NZDT 77 (19 February 2025) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...loss has been suffered. Findings Contract 9. I find a binding contract was entered into by the parties. 10. DX argues there was no sale and purchase agreement entered into, just an invoice rendered. However, in New Zealand, the only forms of contract that are required to be in writing and signed are contracts for the sale and purchase of an interest in land and contracts of guarantee. The agreement reached between DX and I Ltd was for the sale and purchase of a chattel being...

7. OIA-107203.pdf [pdf, 179 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 26 September 2023 Ref: OIA 107203 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Immigration and Protection claims Thank you for your email of 2 September 2023, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding appeals to the Immigration and P...

8. LCRO 135/2024 FA v TK and GY (25 March 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...sister] did earlier and was awarded compensation (High Court orders 1h and 1gii) I will submit a log of the hours of work to carry out maintenance and market the property”. [10] The second respondent asked her to confirm that the work had been requested by the listing agent under to cl 2(d) of the Order or agreed by the sisters under cl 2(j). [11] In an initial email to all the sisters, the first respondent set out the expense details and the terms of the Order and then recorded h...

9. TQ IQ v ZC [2021] NZDT 1704 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...payable in additional to actual additional expenses. 13. Based on the findings above, ZC is to pay $1173.00 + $361.00 + $100.00 to TQ and IQ, being $1634.00. Referee Perfect Date: 10 December 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. EC v UU [2025] NZDT 43 (1 April 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...that an order has been issued the respondent can contract the insurer and see if any of the instalment plans or discounts offered still stand. Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 01 April 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...