Search Results

1. CEIT Homeowners Guide [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...any of the conferences or hearings. • Again, this person can be anyone you choose – a friend, colleague or family member. 2 About this guide In this guide we explain how the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal works from the time an application is made to the time it is resolved. We want everybody involved to know what to expect as they participate in the process. There are five parts: 1. Who can apply – this is the first step in the process, and this section lets you...

2. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...BOYS 30 November 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION [1] This decision is about whether the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and Tower Insurance Limited (Tower) may be removed from this claim due to an application under s 11 of the Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019 (the Act) bringing the matter to an end. [2] On 27 August 2021, the Tribunal found that EQC’s decision to decline claims for damage from the...

3. UC and NT Family Trust v TT Ltd [2020] NZDT 1497 (11 August 2020) [pdf, 137 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1497 APPLICANT UC and NT Family Trust (trustees UC and NT) RESPONDENT TT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC and NT (trustees of The UC and the NT Family Trust (Trust)) is claiming $4,063.74 being: a. $346.75 for balance of rental they say was owing at Covid -19 Level 3 b. $20.60 (

4. DN v C Ltd & D Ltd [2023] NZDT 283 (12 July 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...point, I place little weight on K’s evidence. He has not attended the hearing and it is equally likely that he told his boss what he wanted to hear, that is that he followed protocol in inspecting the vehicle prior to the hirer as he did not, as claimed by the applicant. [12] Further the photographs provided are of little benefit. They are not dated and despite careful inspection I can see not sign of damage. I accept a highly qualified professional may recognise some damage in the s...

5. BB Ltd OD Ltd v ED Ltd [2019] NZDT 1532 (18 December 2019) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...APPLICANT BB Limited APPLICANT OD Limited RESPONDENT ED Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: ED Limited is to deliver the Toyota Prius to OD Limited on or before Wednesday 15 January 2020. Reasons: 1. The applicants are in the business of supplying vehicles to motor vehicle dealers along with finance for those vehicles. From time to time OD Limited supplied TD Limited with vehicles under the terms of a Vehicle Supply and Security Agreement (Sec...

6. EU v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 181 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 181 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT G Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant claims compensation after his vehicle suffered damaging traveling on a portion of [highwa...

7. FN v PL [2023] NZDT 681 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 681 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT PL The Tribunal orders: PL is to pay $400.00 to FN on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons 1. FN and PL were formerly friends/friendly acquaintances. FN says that in 2022 he loaned $400 to PL, paying it to him via internet banking payment around August 2022. The loan amount was repaid by PL the next day....

8. SU v WC [2022] NZDT 215 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 110 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 215 APPLICANT SU RESPONDENT WC The Tribunal orders: WC is to pay SU the sum of $2,755.32 on or by 16 December 2022. Reasons 1. SU brings a claim against WC for $2,755.32 in relation to work that WC commenced but did not complete for the construction of footings and floor for a garage. 2. The parties were advis...

9. FC & KC v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 478 (28 August 2023) [pdf, 219 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 478 APPLICANT FC APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal approves partial settlement and orders: 1. Pursuant to the agreement made by the parties at the hearing, X Ltd shall pay the Applicants $7,991.33 by 15 August 2023. 2. The balance of the Applicants’ claim for $22,000.00 for physical and emotional dis...

10. MI & ZM v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 435 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 195 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 435 APPLICANT MI and ZM RESPONDENT B Ltd T/a GB The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $874.54 to MI and ZM on or before 10 July 2024. Reasons 1. In mid-February 2020 ZM’s family booked flights with GB via a travel agent for her mother and father to fly [City 1] - [International destination] return in September 2020. Due t...