12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 787 APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT IA SECOND RESPONDENT KA THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT AF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. IA and KA, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $15,000.00 to KM on or before 14 December 2023. 2. The claim against AF Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This amended order corrects the mo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1466 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT TD Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In November 2018 LN purchased a sofa bed from TD Ltd. The estimated delivery date was January 2019. There were delays in the supply of the bed and on 11 July 2019 LN cancelled the contract and requested a refund. On 16 Ju...
...regarding a contract for work done in Australia, invoiced and paid for in Australian dollars deposited into an Australian bank account. However, the Act and the Rules entitle any person to commence proceedings by lodging a claim in the prescribed form in the Tribunal nearest by the most practicable route to where the applicant resides. In the present circumstances, I do not think it could be said that the [Tribunal in which the claim was lodged] was not the appropriate Tribunal. Ev...
1 [2014] NZWHT AUCKLAND 5 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 7221: JOHNSTON PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED – 2/235 Ponsonby Road, Ponsonby, Auckland 1011 ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Johnston Property Holdings Limited (JPH) is the owner of Unit 2/235 Ponsonby Road, Auckland. On 20...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 392 APPLICANT ZA RESPONDENT UU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. UU Ltd will make a goodwill payment of $2,000.00 to ZA by 30 June 2024. Reasons Has ZA lost his right to a refund for the cabin? 1. ZA purchased a 3.7 x 3m cabin from UU Ltd in 2021 for $9,107.00. It was constructed by a contractor....
...In this document the plaintiff is recorded 4 as having complained that on 2 June 2010 at approximately 8.30am, in an interview room and in the presence of another prison officer, Mr Bond allegedly said that two of the plaintiff’s refugee claims had been declined. In the complaint form the plaintiff requests that Mr Bond confirm what he had said. In a separate part of the form the following is recorded (presumably by Mr Bond): [The plaintiff] requested that he be able to contac...
...COMPENSATION CORPORATION NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 32 [27 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 32 WRC 41/11 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file statement of claim BETWEEN MALCOLM FRENCH Plaintiff AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Appearances: Ms Barbara Buckett, cou...
Working to resolve earthquake claims? Let’s get it settled Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Practice Notes 2 Introduction The Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (“Tribunal”) has been set up following the Government’s endorsement in August 2018 of a package of initiatives designed to speed up the process of resolving residential insurance claims, and help homeowners move forward with their lives. The purpose of the Tribunal is to provide a pathway to resolutio...
...Authority). [2] The Authority has given two determinations involving the parties. In the first 1 , the Authority concluded that the applicant was the respondent’s employer, rather than another company against which she had originally made her claim, Picture Vehicles Limited. In its second determination 2 , the Authority sustained the respondent’s several personal grievances and awarded her remedies as a result but declined to impose a penalty she sought. [3] The applicant wa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 613 APPLICANT HX RESPONDENT MT SECOND RESPONDENT OM The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against OM is dismissed. 2. MT is to pay HX the sum of $215.00 by no later than 20 September 2024. Reasons: 3. HX moved into a flat rented by MT and stayed from January 2024 until May 2024. OM was also a tenant in the same...