Keeble v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover and Suspension of Entitlements) [2022] NZACC 222 [pdf, 1.3 MB]
12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 256 APPLICANT KI Limited RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: TS is to pay KI Ltd $1,615.44 by Wednesday 5 July 2023, being $1555.44 for three orders and $60.00 for chargeback fees. Reasons: 1. KI Limited trading as K is a supplier of fish, plants and reptiles based in [City]. 2. TS placed three orders with KI. The first...
Working to resolve earthquake claims? Let’s get it settled Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Practice Notes 2 Introduction The Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal (“Tribunal”) has been set up following the Government’s endorsement in August 2018 of a package of initiatives designed to speed up the process of resolving residential insurance claims, and help homeowners move forward with their lives. The purpose of the Tribunal is to provide a pathway to resolutio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 235 APPLICANT LU RESPONDENT CE Ltd The Tribunal orders: LU is to pay $391.00 to CE Ltd on or before 30 December 2022; and CE Ltd is to arrange for LU’s [Vehicle] to be towed to her home address at a time arranged with her. Reasons 1. LU’s [Vehicle] broke down in early July 2022 so she arranged for CE Ltd to...
...assignee to demand rights more properly characterised as personal between the original insured and the insurer. [6] In considering any issues of interpretation in deeds or insurance policies the wording actually used must be considered. [7] The Applicants have explained that they consider the deed of assignment was comprehensive and have pointed to the wording used stating the assignment was of “all the Vendors’ rights, interests and title to the Claims and the resulting procee...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2011] NZDT 299 BETWEEN AEC LTD APPLICANT AND ZVS RESPONDENT Date of Order: 25 July 2011 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZVS is to pay $1,135.64 to AEC Ltd within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] AEC Ltd claimed $1,096.15 as the amount owing by ZVS from a foreign exchange contract. The issues of whether ZV...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 483 APPLICANT E LTD RESPONDENT DM SECOND RESPONDENT KA APPLICANT'S INSURER U Ltd The Tribunal orders: DM and KA, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $26,263.45 to E Ltd on or before 7 July 2023. Reasons: 1. DM had been an employee of E Ltd, and in 2020 returned to work for E L...
...Introduction [1] The Registrar of the Immigration Advisers Authority referred this complaint to the Tribunal. [2] The complaint is that Ms Tangilanu accepted instructions and received a fee to assist the complainants who are a married couple with requests for visas. The allegations are that she: [2.1] Was slow to make the request. [2.2] Made a request for one complainant, and should have done so for both. [2.3] Did not include sufficient information in the request. [2.4] Failed to...
...associated fee through File and Pay. This section outlines how you can defend the following types of proceeding in the High Court: Defending a general civil proceeding - someone wants to recover money or settle a dispute Defending an originating application Defending a civil appeal - someone has asked a senior court to reconsider a judge's decision Defending a bankruptcy notice - someone has applied to have you declared insolvent or unable to pay your debts Defending...
...NZEmpC 57 [27 May 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 57 ARC 74/07 IN THE MATTER OF an application to reinstate a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ERROL WADE Applicant AND HUME PACK-N-COOL LIMITED Respondent Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 20 July, 12 August, 15 and 22 October 2010 Counsel: Mark Donovan, counsel for applicant Kim Stretton, counsel for respondent...