Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 31 [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...areas of justice, education, health, broadcasting, youth programmes sport and recreation. He has also been associated with iwi business and man­ agement developments. His ties with the Tribunal stretch back to its genesis. He was secretary to former Maori MP Matiu Rata who was responsi­ ble for the idea of establishing a body to investigate Maori claims. "For me the issues still are education, communication and employment_" "For me the issues still are edu...

2. LCRO 135/2024 FA v TK and GY (25 March 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...sister] did earlier and was awarded compensation (High Court orders 1h and 1gii) I will submit a log of the hours of work to carry out maintenance and market the property”. [10] The second respondent asked her to confirm that the work had been requested by the listing agent under to cl 2(d) of the Order or agreed by the sisters under cl 2(j). [11] In an initial email to all the sisters, the first respondent set out the expense details and the terms of the Order and then recorded h...

3. NI v FI & MI & GI [2023] NZDT 592 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...respondents damaged the aircraft when moving it, and as they are not responsible for any deterioration after it was delivered to NI’s shed, the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Edwards Date: 13 October 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

4. TG v E Ltd [2024] NZDT 289 (10 May 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...October 2021 for substantial renovations to the applicant’s home. The contract was terminated by the applicant in July 2022 before the works were completed. TG’s written submissions provide full detail of her dissatisfaction with E Ltd’s performance. The claim 5. Generally, TG says that a project cost blowout occurred and was caused by E Ltd and its lack of financial transparency. Due to that she has refused to pay E Ltd’s two final invoices ($24,890.65) and seeks a decl...

5. EI & MQ v M Ltd [2024] NZDT 485 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...February 2024, agreed to wait a further six weeks for the delivery of a replacement bed package based on M Ltd advising that was how long it would take. After 10 weeks, MQ and EI contacted M Ltd inquiring as to where the bed package was. They were informed it was on a container and there was no delivery date provided. In mid-April MQ and EI contacted M Ltd and advised if they could not provide a delivery date then they wanted a refund. M Ltd at first asked for an extension to 31 May 2024 t...

6. TQ IQ v ZC [2021] NZDT 1704 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...payable in additional to actual additional expenses. 13. Based on the findings above, ZC is to pay $1173.00 + $361.00 + $100.00 to TQ and IQ, being $1634.00. Referee Perfect Date: 10 December 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. X Ltd v II [2021] NZDT 1539 (14 May 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1539 APPLICANT X Limited (formerly Q Limited) RESPONDENT II SECOND RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: II and BI are liable to pay $7,536.78 to X Limited in respect of the claim. X Limited is liable to pay $4,492.88 to II and BI in respect of the counter claim. After the amount of $4,492.88 payable by X Limited

8. BV v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 677 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...has anyone who might drive the vehicle had their driving licence suspended or cancelled, or had a special condition added to their licence? [3] The policy was renewed each subsequent year. At the beginning of each renewal period, the same renewal form was provided to BV. He did not alter the form, and the word “no” remained as his answer to the question stated above. On 3 November 2023, BV was involved in a crash while driving the vehicle, which was not economical to repair. He clai...

9. HG v ET [2020] NZDT 1411 (1 July 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...against BW is withdrawn. Reasons CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 1. On 23 January 2020, four vehicles were involved in a nose-to-tail incident on [highway]. 2. At the point where the incident occurred, a stationary queue of traffic had formed on the road. HG, driving a [car], (referred to as “Driver A”) arrived at this queue, and was able to stop short to avoid hitting the car in front of him. However, ET, who was driving a car owned by IK of TQ Ltd, was travelling b...

10. QN v CI & EN [2024] NZDT 472 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 472 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT CI SECOND RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: 1. EN is to pay QN $4,999.00 on or before 25 June 2024. 2. The claim against CI is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QN lent her son, EN, $5,000.00 in March 2023 for the purchase of a car. The car was purchased, and registered in the name of EN’s partner, CI. Two or three months later EN and CI separated, a...