Search Results

1. Body Corporate 180379 v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...Illingworth QC and S E Wroe for Claimants G J Christie and C M Fairnie for Auckland Council J McBride for Gapes and Redwood Group No.2 Ltd GJ Kohler for Fullemann and Eiger Ltd Determination of status of 2002 Act claims, application to dismiss for want of prosecution, and application for consolidation 12 March 2013 2 [1] The claimants are the owners of a block of leaky apartments situated in Fox Street, Parnell....

2. L Ltd v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 710 (22 August 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 710 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2022, a client of K Ltd caused damage to some property owned by L Ltd. L Ltd claimed $148,853.61 in damages. K Ltd engaged an assessor to consider the claim. The assessor recommended that $117,176.40 be paid. K Ltd asked for details...

3. FG v QP [2023] NZDT 156 (30 June 2023).pdf [pdf, 173 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 156 APPLICANT FG trading as BN RESPONDENT QP APPLICANT TO COUNTER- CLAIM G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim relating to the contract for music arrangement is struck out and the counter-claim is struck out; and QP and G Ltd are jointly and severally liable to pay $2928.05 to FG, trading as BN, for performance s...

4. HG & IU v AA [2023] NZDT 790 (23 December 2023) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 790 APPLICANT HG APPLICANT IU RESPONDENT AA The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HG and IU claim for payment for services rendered in preparing for and representing the AA at the Tenancy Tribunal in July 2023. AA is a landlord, and through a mutual friend, he approached IU and HG for help with defend...

5. Guide to the MVDT [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...ought not to have been brought; • a party refuses to discuss the claim with the other party and try to settle it before the hearing; or • a party fails to appear at the hearing without good cause. How to file a claim You need to fill out the application form available at www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals. When you have completed the application form you can post it together with all supporting documents to the MVDT at the address at the end of this guide. Important: If your vehicle wa...

6. [2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato DHB [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Dent’s pleadings in the matter are now contained in a third amended statement of claim dated 27 August 2015. In the second statement of claim, Ms Dent included a challenge to the costs determination that has been carried through in a different form into the third amended statement of claim. It is appropriate for the hearing of the challenge and cross-challenge to proceed on the basis that the subsequent costs determination is also subject to challenge. [3] At a directions confe...

7. IC v GN [2020] NZDT 1512 (19 March 2020) [pdf, 149 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1512 APPLICANT Insurance Company Ltd RESPONDENT GN SECOND RESPONDENT SD The Tribunal hereby orders: GN and SD are jointly and severally liable to pay $11,185.10 to Insurance Company Limited no later than 2 April 2020. Reasons [1] On 15 May 2017 SD contacted Insurance Company Ltd (IC) to advise that a...

8. SH v DM [2024] NZDT 211 (18 March 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 211 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT DM APPLICANT'S INSURER W Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by W Ltd and SH is dismissed. 2. SH is to pay $3,625.37 to DM by 7 April 2024. If not paid by that date, interest of $176.17 will be added for enforcement purposes. Reasons A. THE CLAIM 1. W Ltd and SH h...

9. TT v BB Ltd [2022] NZDT 152 (13 September 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 152 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT BB Ltd The Tribunal orders: TT is not liable to pay BB Ltd any fees, including [accounting software] fees, after the date of discharge from her bankruptcy. Reason 1. The respondent was the applicant’s financial supervisor during her 3-year bankruptcy that ended in February 2019. The d...

10. BO v NC Ltd [2024] NZDT 13 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 219 KB]

    ...RESPONDENT NC Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC Ltd must pay BO $3,700.00 by 4pm on 27 February 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased a new [car] from the respondent, with the purchase completing in July 2022. The applicant has a number of claims against the respondent: a. The applicant was unhappy with the delay between paying the deposit for the car and final purchase. The applicant claims that this forced the applicant to trade in his old car for less than it was worth...