Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 27 Dent v Waikato DHB [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Dent’s pleadings in the matter are now contained in a third amended statement of claim dated 27 August 2015. In the second statement of claim, Ms Dent included a challenge to the costs determination that has been carried through in a different form into the third amended statement of claim. It is appropriate for the hearing of the challenge and cross-challenge to proceed on the basis that the subsequent costs determination is also subject to challenge. [3] At a directions confe...

2. SH v DM [2024] NZDT 211 (18 March 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 211 APPLICANT SH RESPONDENT DM APPLICANT'S INSURER W Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by W Ltd and SH is dismissed. 2. SH is to pay $3,625.37 to DM by 7 April 2024. If not paid by that date, interest of $176.17 will be added for enforcement purposes. Reasons A. THE CLAIM 1. W Ltd and SH h...

3. List of offenders awarded compensation A-E

   If you‘re a victim of an offender named in a notice of payment into the Victims’ Claims Trust Account, you may be entitled to make a claim against the money awarded to the offender. Notice of end of process for making and determining victims’ claims Notice of payment into Victims’ Claims Trust Account This is the current list of offenders that have been awarded compensation - surnames A-E: Daniel Philip DIACK AKA Daniel Philip DLOCK Katrina Roma Epiha Daniel Philip DIACK AKA Daniel Phi...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Victims & justice >
   3. Victims' Special Claims Tribunal >
   4. List of offenders awarded compensation

4. BO v NC Ltd [2024] NZDT 13 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT NC Ltd The Tribunal orders: NC Ltd must pay BO $3,700.00 by 4pm on 27 February 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased a new [car] from the respondent, with the purchase completing in July 2022. The applicant has a number of claims against the respondent: a. The applicant was unhappy with the delay between paying the deposit for the car and final purchase. The applicant claims that this forced the applicant to trade in his old car for less than it was worth...

5. TT v BB Ltd [2022] NZDT 152 (13 September 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 152 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT BB Ltd The Tribunal orders: TT is not liable to pay BB Ltd any fees, including [accounting software] fees, after the date of discharge from her bankruptcy. Reason 1. The respondent was the applicant’s financial supervisor during her 3-year bankruptcy that ended in February 2019. The d...

6. Kaituna Resource Teacher's Notes [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...prepared with fourth form curriculum in mind, however they can be used at all levels of secondary school. They can be used together or separately. The aim of the fact sheets is to introduce the work of the waitangi Tribunal both by showing what claims are and the process they go through, and by providing a case study. The case study - Kaituna Claim - has been set up as a decision-making exercise for students. The recommendations that the Waitangi Tribunal made have been left to...

7. M1 Ltd v M2 Ltd & FS [2023] NZDT 739 (15 December 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 739 APPLICANT M1 Ltd RESPONDENT M2 Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT FS The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons Introduction 1. M1 Ltd have filed a claim (the current claim) for $30,000.00 in relation to a Building Warrant of Fitness (BWOF) that was not provided prior to the settlement of a property transaction for the...

8. KT & XG v ZA [2022] NZDT 30 (5 May 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 30 APPLICANT KT and XG RESPONDENT ZA The Tribunal orders: ZA is to pay $516.09 to KT and XG on or before 27 May 2022. Reasons 1. In March 2021 KT and XG booked ZA’s [Travel website] accommodation in [City A] for the dates 1 November to 7 November 2021, paying the price in full of $1032.18 for the stay....

9. BK v YP Ltd [2013] NZDT 422 (25 November 2013) [pdf, 64 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 422 BETWEEN BK APPLICANT AND YP LIMITED RESPONDENT Date of Order: 25 November 2013 Referee: Referee McKinstry ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] On 22 March 2013 the applicant withdrew money from his bank account with YP Limited. The applicant says that he wanted to withdraw $3,300.00. The bank says that the applicant asked to wi...

10. 2017 archive

    On this page: Minimum claims for duty lawyers over the holiday period New family and civil legal aid application form Section 26 Parole Act applications Criminal legal aid applications and amendments to grant Consultation on proposed changes to mental health rosters Hearing times for criminal grants Call for Expressions of Interest in Chairperson of the Performance Review Committee End of year/New year payments New family and civil application form finalised New family and civil application for...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. Lawyers & service providers >
    3. Legal aid lawyers >
    4. Whats New for lawyers providing Legal Aid