12860 items matching your search terms
...SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2021] NZEmpC 53 [27 April 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 53 EMPC 312/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for rehearing AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs by Murray Spackman BETWEEN PATRICK MARTIN Applicant AND SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Respondent Hearing: On the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 223 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: ET’s claim against T Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant claimed that she lost a tailgate from the back of the trailer she was using to deliver metal to the respondent as a result of negligence by the respondent’s staff member. The applicant claims $2...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 136 BETWEEN ACE APPLICANT AND ZXZ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 December 2012 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZXZ Ltd, is to pay the sum of $253.00 directly ACE Ltd within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] In January 2010, ZXZ Ltd sent a fax to some 900 New Zealand pharmacies, in...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 321 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: O Ltd is to pay directly to D Ltd the sum of $23,369.15 on or before Thursday, 9 May 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks payment for printing and distribution se...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 257 APPLICANT ES APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT HT SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: 1. HT and KT are jointly and severally liable to pay ES and TS $3187.73 on or before 20 April 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. Reasons: 1. The parties entered a sale and
Rōpū Take Tautohenga Ā-Waka – Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal IMPORTANT: If you bought a vehicle from a private seller and want to dispute the sale – you’ll need to go through the Disputes Tribunal.Disputes Tribunal The Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal is only for people who have bought a vehicle from a registered trader – or from a trader that meets the criteria for registration but isn’t. You can look at the Motor Vehicle Sales Act to find out more about the definition of a trader.
...Respondent DETERMINATION AS TO WITHDRAWAL DATE Dated 26 October 2012 [1] Brett and Sandra Hawkins are the owners of a leaky house in Rubens Lane, West Harbour. In October 2003, they filed an application for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing (DBH) and in June 2005 they filed for adjudication under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002. After the Weathertight Homes Resolution Service...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 543 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim HB RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against N Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 05 March 2024 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. In considering an application for a rehearing when both parties have attended the hearing, the Tribunal must decide whether th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 76 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: F Ltd is to pay directly to B Ltd the sum of $3,800.75 on or before Monday, 20 March 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant provided commercial valuatio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1602 APPLICANT EF APPLICANT QF RESPONDENT JD RESPONDENT QN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EF and QF purchased a property from QN and JD on 21 October 2020. As part of the sale, the parties signed a deed that assigned all of the vendor’s remaining rights and interests in their in...