12730 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 12 APPLICANT BX RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. BX’s claim against F Ltd is dismissed. 2. BX must pay F Ltd $160.00 by 4pm on 13 March 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant parked in a carpark monitored by the respondent on 21 August 2023 and received a parking ticket for unauthorised parking for an amount of $160.00....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 630 APPLICANT PI RESPONDENT NQJ SECOND RESPONDENT XB The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Background 1. In August 2019, PI was contacted by MX (a vet based in [Town]) to assist with de-stocking animals at a local farm owned by NQ. 2. NQ was elderly and in poor health. NQJ became involved due to concerns about...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 286 APPLICANT GN RESPONDENT MX APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by GN against MX is proved. MX is to pay B Ltd the sum of $20,493.59 on or by 5:00 pm on 21 August 2023. Reasons 1. On 21 October 2023 the car driven by MX drove into the back of GN’s parked car around 4:30 am causing damage. GN’s...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1419 APPLICANT RESPONDENT DX RESPONDENT APPLICANT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. I Ltd’s claim against DX is dismissed. 2. DX’s claim for non-liability is upheld. Reasons 1. In December 2016 DX telephoned I Ltd to book a service for a car. On 2 December 2016 I Ltd’s technician came to DX’s address and provided a quote for the work...
...new matters that have arisen since the HCAs. 5. ND Ltd also argued that the 2 claims should be 3 separate claims as they involve 3 separate lot owners, US and DF jointly, KG separately and HK separately and that those lot owners should be the Applicants for those claims. 6. The hearing was adjourned for the second claim, [redacted], to be split, KG to be joined as an Applicant under this file number and a separate new claim to be filed for HK, which subsequently became [redacted]....
...other parties involved (‘second respondent’) • your insurance company’s details, if your insurance might cover your claim • details of the dispute and the amount you are claiming. • what you’ve done to try to settle the dispute (‘Applicant’s contact with respondent’ – when you make a claim, you’re called the applicant). Your contact details Let us know straight away if your contact details change after you’ve sent us your claim. Keeping your contact detail...
...other parties involved (‘second respondent’) • your insurance company’s details, if your insurance might cover your claim • details of the dispute and the amount you are claiming. • what you’ve done to try to settle the dispute (‘Applicant’s contact with respondent’ – when you make a claim, you’re called the applicant). Your contact details Let us know straight away if your contact details change after you’ve sent us your claim. Keeping your contact detail...
...in the compendious INZ Operational Manual. [11] The holder of a temporary visa who, during the currency of that visa, applies without success for a further temporary visa has a limited right to reconsideration of the decline decision provided the application for reconsideration is made not later than 14 days after notification of the decline decision (IA, s 185). 4 [12] Judicial review rights are also time restricted. Such proceedings must be commenced not later than 28 days afte...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 273 BETWEEN AEI APPLICANT AND ZVN City Council RESPONDENT Date of Order: 10 October 2012 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] This is a decision on jurisdiction. AEI argued that ZVN City Council was negligent as to the terms of resource consent for work at a property adjacent to...