Search Results

1. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 61 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...under a quarter of the original confiscated lands. It located its blocks arbitrarily and without the consent of those Mäori affected. The hapu of Ngäti Ranginui, in particular, were affected by the unfair way in which land was returned. The form of title used for the return was individualised European tenure. Mäori customary title was thus abolished without the consent of owners. Copies of the Tauranga Raupatu Report at the release in 2004. Professor Keith Sorrenson, histo...

2. LT v NS [2023] NZDT 277 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...the respondent would begin repayments on the outstanding US$17,000. There also appears to have been discussion on the respondent making provision for the repayment of any outstanding portion under his will. The applicant recorded the meeting in note form, the respondent did not sign the note. The respondent has provided no evidence on the content of the meeting nor confirmed the date on the advice of this lawyer. He has not denied a meeting took place and discussion on the outstanding loan...

3. L Foundation v OS [2023] NZDT 554 (9 February 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...determining those questions. This was a commercial arrangement. The Trust is required to maintain accurate and complete financial records of its assets, income, and expenses. There will be bank statements, records of sales (such as advertising information, emails and texts with purchasers, etc) that should enable an accurate calculation of the number of sales and therefore the amount of commission owed to OS. There should be some record of the sale of the final two pups. There should be...

4. CO v KY & Ors [2024] NZDT 807 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...was the first agent to show her clients through the property. 15. KY and G Ltd do not owe CO any money toward the commission. The claim is dismissed. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 19 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. GB v B Ltd & Ors [2024] NZDT 604 (24 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...cannot be awarded. Conclusion 11. For these reasons PD and B Ltd are, jointly and severally, to pay GB the sum of $6,637.96 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 24 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

6. AEC Ltd v ZVS [2011] NZDT 299 (25 July 2011) [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...of Order: 25 July 2011 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZVS is to pay $1,135.64 to AEC Ltd within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] AEC Ltd claimed $1,096.15 as the amount owing by ZVS from a foreign exchange contract. The issues of whether ZVS owed this money and how much she owed were determined on the evidence (balance of probabilities or what most likely happened) and the law...

7. FL v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 248 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 248 APPLICANT FL RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 October 2021, FL contracted C Ltd to make 6 bridesmaid dresses to a single design for $250.00 plus GST each. The bridesmaids each paid for their own dress. 2. The contract required each bridesmaid to provide her me...

8. B v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2021] CEIT-2021-0006 [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...before they are sent to the Council; and 4. Mr B will apply for consent within 8 weeks of demolition being completed. 20) On 28 June 2017, Mr B emailed Southern Response referencing the earlier discussion with Ms F. The email states: I… informed you that we had moved out of our house and it could be demolished as soon as you were ready … I understand that our lawyer had informed you that we had moved out in Mid April which means the house has been empty awaiting demolition...

9. [2007] NZEmpC CC 20/07 O'Flynn v Southland DHB [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...further particulars in the Employment Court Regulations, rule 185 of the High Court Rules applies. The settled principles from authorities relating to that rule are that there must be sufficient particulars in a statement of claim to: • Inform the other party of the nature of the case as distinguished from the mode in which the case will be proved.1 • Prevent surprise. • Enable the preparation of evidence. • Limit and define the issues. [5] The difference between fact...

10. OJ v KH [2020] NZDT 1534 (4 May 2020) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1534 APPLICANT OJ RESPONDENT KH The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. All evidence in this proceeding is suppressed unless it is published in anonymized form and not in association with other information that would be likely to personally identify the parties. Reasons: 1. OJ is the owner and operator of EB Escort Agency in [location]. On 2 July 2018, KH joined the agency as one of its es...