Search Results

1. IQ Ltd & Ors v ND Ltd [2023] NZDT 638 (11 October 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...new matters that have arisen since the HCAs. 5. ND Ltd also argued that the 2 claims should be 3 separate claims as they involve 3 separate lot owners, US and DF jointly, KG separately and HK separately and that those lot owners should be the Applicants for those claims. 6. The hearing was adjourned for the second claim, [redacted], to be split, KG to be joined as an Applicant under this file number and a separate new claim to be filed for HK, which subsequently became [redacted]....

2. MOJ0058 Disputes Tribunal booklet [pdf, 565 KB]

   ...other parties involved (‘second respondent’) • your insurance company’s details, if your insurance might cover your claim • details of the dispute and the amount you are claiming. • what you’ve done to try to settle the dispute (‘Applicant’s contact with respondent’ – when you make a claim, you’re called the applicant). Your contact details Let us know straight away if your contact details change after you’ve sent us your claim. Keeping your contact detail...

3. Disputes Tribunal booklet [pdf, 574 KB]

   ...other parties involved (‘second respondent’) • your insurance company’s details, if your insurance might cover your claim • details of the dispute and the amount you are claiming. • what you’ve done to try to settle the dispute (‘Applicant’s contact with respondent’ – when you make a claim, you’re called the applicant). Your contact details Let us know straight away if your contact details change after you’ve sent us your claim. Keeping your contact detail...

4. Koso v Chief Executive Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2014] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...in the compendious INZ Operational Manual. [11] The holder of a temporary visa who, during the currency of that visa, applies without success for a further temporary visa has a limited right to reconsideration of the decline decision provided the application for reconsideration is made not later than 14 days after notification of the decline decision (IA, s 185). 4 [12] Judicial review rights are also time restricted. Such proceedings must be commenced not later than 28 days afte...

5. AEI and ZVN [2012] NZDT 273 (10 October 2012) [pdf, 46 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 273 BETWEEN AEI APPLICANT AND ZVN City Council RESPONDENT Date of Order: 10 October 2012 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] This is a decision on jurisdiction. AEI argued that ZVN City Council was negligent as to the terms of resource consent for work at a property adjacent to...

6. Adie v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 112 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 252 KB]

   .............................................................................................................................. [55] Introduction [1] Mr Adie has lived overseas for several years. He says that he applied in December 2020 to the Corporation for cover for symptoms which he considered were caused by a 2006 ankle injury. There was no usual application form claiming cover for Mr Adie’s symptoms and Mr Adie did not return to New Zealand in 2020 for a consultation with a me...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 53 Martin v Solar Bright Ltd (in liq) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2021] NZEmpC 53 [27 April 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 53 EMPC 312/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for rehearing AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs by Murray Spackman BETWEEN PATRICK MARTIN Applicant AND SOLAR BRIGHT LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Respondent Hearing: On the...

8. ET v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 223 (14 April 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 223 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: ET’s claim against T Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant claimed that she lost a tailgate from the back of the trailer she was using to deliver metal to the respondent as a result of negligence by the respondent’s staff member. The applicant claims $2...

9. ACE v ZXZ [2012] NZDT 136 (19 December 2012) [pdf, 69 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 136 BETWEEN ACE APPLICANT AND ZXZ RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 December 2012 Referee: Referee Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZXZ Ltd, is to pay the sum of $253.00 directly ACE Ltd within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] In January 2010, ZXZ Ltd sent a fax to some 900 New Zealand pharmacies, in...

10. ES & TS v HT & KT [2024] NZDT 257 (2 April 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 257 APPLICANT ES APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT HT SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: 1. HT and KT are jointly and severally liable to pay ES and TS $3187.73 on or before 20 April 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. Reasons: 1. The parties entered a sale and