Search Results

1. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...of letters (on the Standards Committee file) from the Waitangi Tribunal between August 2008 and June 2010 (written predominantly to Mr AS) reflected the nature of enquires that had been made by Mr AS and/or the Applicant. [2] The Tribunal’s request for more information in relation to their claim led the whānau to approach the Practitioner in around December 2008. The Practitioner advised from the outset that there were difficulties with the claim because the [Iwi X] settlement...

2. DD v QX [2022] NZDT 239 (2 December 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 239 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT QX The Tribunal orders: The Respondent shall pay the Applicant $829.50 by 22 December 2022. Reasons: 1. The Applicants’ vehicle was damaged on 26 December 2021 when The Respondent was driving the Applicant and his three friends to the bottle shop. One of the Applicant’ friends was the...

3. HA v CQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 626 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 225 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 626 APPLICANT HA RESPONDENT CQ Limited The Tribunal orders: HA’s claim against CQ Limited is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant and her mother entered into a property management agreement with the respondent in respect of an apartment. The applicant claims that the respondent breached the property management agreement by m...

4. UN & QN v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 443 (9 September 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 443 APPLICANT UN APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT & COUNTER- CLAIMANT (amended) U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd shall pay UN and QN $500.00 by 26 September 2023. U Ltd’s counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The UN and QN have been staying at Holiday Park for a summer holiday every year for 20+ years. Site

5. Wilson - Oue 2B3 [2015] Chief Judge's MB 215 (2015 CJ 215) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...[9] The applicant states that after filing the June application he found further evidence of what he alleges to be false whakapapa presented to the Court on a number of occasions. On 24 July 2014, the applicant made the seven s 45 applications and requested that the filing fees be waived. [10] On 5 August 2014, the applicant received a letter from the Deputy Registrar advising that the applications could not be accepted due to non-provision of the required fee. In the letter the D...

6. GC v NT [2022] NZDT 184 (30 September 2022) [pdf, 94 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 184 APPLICANT GC RESPONDENT NT The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. On 4 April 2022 GC entered into a contract with NT to provide entertainment on 6 August 2022 for her 70th birthday party. The agreed fee was $3,000.00. GC paid a deposit of $500.00, with the balance payable on 3 August 202...

7. ZI v DM [2023] NZDT 641 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 641 APPLICANT ZI RESPONDENT DM The Tribunal orders: ZI’s claim against DM is struck out. Reasons: 1. The parties are directors and shareholders of a company called DD Ltd, each with a fifty per cent. share in the company. The respondent withdrew $9,587.17 from the DD Ltd’s bank account. The applicant requests that the Tribu...

8. EQ v ND Ltd & DQ [2023] NZDT 9 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 9 APPLICANT EQ RESPONDENT ND Ltd RESPONDENT DQ The Tribunal orders: ND Ltd and DQ are jointly and severally liable to pay directly to EQ the sum of $8,936.22 on or before 2 January 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Only the applicant appeared at the hearing. When I called the re...

9. What the scheme can help with

   ...claim under the scheme. Types of losses you can claim for You can claim for losses such as: destruction of housing, vehicles, household contents, and clothing accommodation expenses up to three months lost earnings. If the assessor looking after your application agrees, you may also be able to claim for: losses not covered, or only partly covered, by other forms of compensation threats as well as actual damage to property. The police will need to endorse the claim. They will need to agree th...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Victims & justice >
   3. Criminal Justice Assistance Reimbursement Scheme

10. SQ v X Ltd [2022] NZDT 195 (14 December 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 195 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Has X Ltd breached its contract with SQ? 1. The claim made by SQ is that X Ltd has breached the contract for insurance by declining her claim for payment for the loss of [brand 1] jewellery given to her partner NN. SQ has to...