Search Results

1. Wai 3300, 2.6.011 Memorandum directions of Chief Judge Dr C L Fox following inquiry design judicial conference [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...claimants in their kōrero. Claim participation and eligibility 36. Crown counsel advised that the Crown had not yet conducted a thorough claim-by-claim analysis with respect to eligibility issues, in part to avoid an overly adversarial approach. Counsel requested the Tribunal and counsel to consider whether such a claim analysis was necessary or desirable at this stage, prior to the wānanga takiwā. 37. Several claimant counsel sought a further opportunity to file statements of claim for...

2. FN v PL [2023] NZDT 681 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 681 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT PL The Tribunal orders: PL is to pay $400.00 to FN on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons 1. FN and PL were formerly friends/friendly acquaintances. FN says that in 2022 he loaned $400 to PL, paying it to him via internet banking payment around August 2022. The loan amount was repaid by PL the next day. FN says that in setting up the internet banking pa

3. EX v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 514 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...apply to this contract. 4. Section 6 of the Act implies a guarantee into every sale to a consumer that the good must be of acceptable quality. Section 7 of the Act provides that the Tribunal must take into account a wide variety of contextual information when determining if the good is of acceptable quality. It states that the good must be acceptable in appearance and finish and be free from minor defects. 5. EX said the bike bag was sold to him with a defect. He said that he did...

4. LCRO 2/2018 MC v TL (17 June 2020) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...his legal costs incurred in his application to set aside the paternity order. Complaint [9] Mr MC lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 9 June 2017. (1) Terms of engagement – rules 3.4, 3.5 [10] He claimed despite requesting Mr TL on three occasions to sign the terms of engagement, Mr TL told him [Mr TL’s] signature was “not a requirement” of the terms of engagement. 1 Family Court order (25 No...

5. CD v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 262 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...reported that the owner of the car was not a bona fide customer of [shopping centre], and the car had been parked overnight. 14. WI said that request breaches are somewhat different to breaches issued for exceeding the time limits. She says on her information, CD had parked in breach of the terms and conditions of the car park and the initial breach notice was correct. 15. I do not accept that the initial breach notice correctly stated what terms and conditions CD had been in br...

6. AEC Ltd v ZVS [2011] NZDT 299 (25 July 2011) [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...of Order: 25 July 2011 Referee: Referee Benson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZVS is to pay $1,135.64 to AEC Ltd within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] AEC Ltd claimed $1,096.15 as the amount owing by ZVS from a foreign exchange contract. The issues of whether ZVS owed this money and how much she owed were determined on the evidence (balance of probabilities or what most likely happened) and the law...

7. AM v BN [2022] NZDT 176 (29 September 2022) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...he says he did not sell the car to Mr AM. 2. When two people agree for one of them to sell a car and the other person agrees to buy that car, and the buyer pays for the car with either money or something of value eg a car swap, a contract is formed between the two parties. Section 135 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (“CCLA”) provides that it is an implied condition of that contract that the seller has the right to sell that car. If the effect of a security interest...

8. FL v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 248 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 248 APPLICANT FL RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 8 October 2021, FL contracted C Ltd to make 6 bridesmaid dresses to a single design for $250.00 plus GST each. The bridesmaids each paid for their own dress. 2. The contract required each bridesmaid to provide her me...

9. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 02 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...date (Corporation’s memorandum 24 January 1996). Again, I do not know whether the decision is missing, but I have not seen it. The certificate is missing. I do not know if any review was sought. [24] On an unknown date, Mr Jones once more requested ERC, but was now claiming ERC backdated to the date of the accident on 5 January 1988. The claim document is not available. This is the claim which is the subject of the current appeal. 6 [25] On 8 March 1993, Dr B...

10. Forms & fees

    Make a claim Forms Amount sought Fee Apply online DT-Claim-form-v2.pdf [PDF, 750 KB] Guide to filing a claim form can be found under how to make a claim If the total amount sought under the claim is less than $2000 $61 If the total amount sought under the claim is $2000 or more but less than $5000 $121 If the total amount sought under the claim is between $5000 and $30,000 $243 Acknowledgement from applicant's insurer Free Back to top Rehearings & appeals Forms Fee...

    Located in:

    1. Disputes Tribunal