12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 336 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons 1. The company number for B Ltd was called at the time of the hearing and KX’s mobile number was given by the employee. KX was phoned twice on his mobile but calls went to voicemail on each call. 1. ET has reques...
...There are 55 referees in 36 District Courts around the country, so help is available no matter where you live. Watch our short online videos on Ministry website www.disputestribunal.govt.nz/ about-2/ What can we help with? The Tribunal can hear claims up to the value of $30,000.00. Examples include: Contracts which have been breached For example, disputes about: • What was agreed, and whether it is binding • Who the parties are to the contract • How much is owed, or how lo...
...There are 55 referees in 36 District Courts around the country, so help is available no matter where you live. Watch our short online videos on Ministry website www.disputestribunal.govt.nz/ about-2/ What can we help with? The Tribunal can hear claims up to the value of $30,000.00. Examples include: Contracts which have been breached For example, disputes about: • What was agreed, and whether it is binding • Who the parties are to the contract • How much is owed, or how lo...
Statement of claim Originating application Notice of appeal Order adjudicating debtor bankrupt Application for a writ of habeas corpus Statement of defence Statement of defence and counterclaim Statement of counterclaim Statement of cross-claim Statement of claim against a third party Notice of cross-appeal Affidavit
Legal aid for Waitangi Tribunal claims Legal aid is available for claims involved in proceedings before the Waitangi Tribunal. This includes claims in District, Kaupapa, Urgent and Remedies Inquiries. Once your claim has been registered by the Waitangi Tribunal and given a Wai number, you can apply for legal aid to help with the legal costs of progressing your claim. Legal aid covers the costs of obtaining legal advice and representation. Generally, you will not...
...both parties to the claim agree in writing. The Tribunal cannot hear counterclaims. What happens when the MVDT receives a claim? Once the MVDT receives a claim against you or your company, it will refer the claim to you by sending a copy of the application form and the other documents provided by the applicant. You are then required to contact the applicant to discuss the claim and file a report on the outcome of those discussions within 14 days. Costs can be ordered against you if...
...APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT ES Ltd The Tribunal orders: TG is to pay directly to ES Ltd the sum of $24,890.65 on or before 31 January 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was adjourned to allow the respondent to file a counterclaim. The respondent has done so. The applicant is concerned this counterclaim was filed out of time. I am satisfied the respondent did lodge the counterclaim within the time limit ordered by the Tribunal, but the Tribunal did not process thi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 659 APPLICANT LM RESPONDENT MH The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant claims damages following a motor vehicle collision on 17 June 2023. The applicant’s claim includes a claim for $60 for medical ex...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 753 APPLICANT EH RESPONDENT KN Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant claims for the loss of his vehicle that he values at $22.000 after a collision on [Road] on Friday 19 April 2024. The a...
...not intend to mislead the respondent. The applicant claims he was never asked about his criminal history and did not realise he had an obligation to disclosure it. The applicant claims, ED, the car dealer he purchased the vehicle from filed in the forms on his behalf. The applicant claims he was only asked to sign a one-page finance agreement and has no knowledge of any insurance documents ED may have provided to the respondent. [4] This claim has been previously considered by both UG Ltd...