12541 items matching your search terms
Statement of claim Originating application Notice of appeal Order adjudicating debtor bankrupt Application for a writ of habeas corpus Statement of defence Statement of defence and counterclaim Statement of counterclaim Statement of cross-claim Statement of claim against a third party Notice of cross-appeal Affidavit
Legal aid for Waitangi Tribunal claims Legal aid is available for claims involved in proceedings before the Waitangi Tribunal. This includes claims in District, Kaupapa, Urgent and Remedies Inquiries. Once your claim has been registered by the Waitangi Tribunal and given a Wai number, you can apply for legal aid to help with the legal costs of progressing your claim. Legal aid covers the costs of obtaining legal advice and representation. Generally, you will not...
...APPLICANT TG RESPONDENT ES Ltd The Tribunal orders: TG is to pay directly to ES Ltd the sum of $24,890.65 on or before 31 January 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was adjourned to allow the respondent to file a counterclaim. The respondent has done so. The applicant is concerned this counterclaim was filed out of time. I am satisfied the respondent did lodge the counterclaim within the time limit ordered by the Tribunal, but the Tribunal did not process thi...
...both parties to the claim agree in writing. The Tribunal cannot hear counterclaims. What happens when the MVDT receives a claim? Once the MVDT receives a claim against you or your company, it will refer the claim to you by sending a copy of the application form and the other documents provided by the applicant. You are then required to contact the applicant to discuss the claim and file a report on the outcome of those discussions within 14 days. Costs can be ordered against you if...
...not intend to mislead the respondent. The applicant claims he was never asked about his criminal history and did not realise he had an obligation to disclosure it. The applicant claims, ED, the car dealer he purchased the vehicle from filed in the forms on his behalf. The applicant claims he was only asked to sign a one-page finance agreement and has no knowledge of any insurance documents ED may have provided to the respondent. [4] This claim has been previously considered by both UG Ltd...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 567 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT EF Ltd The Tribunal orders: This claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The parties contracted for the supply of engineering design services for ET’s project in [Location]. 2. An estimate of costs for a standard project was provided and a deposit of $1,552.50 was paid to EF Ltd in December 2022. An initial...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 34 BETWEEN ABC APPLICANT AND ZZB RESPONDENT Date of Order: 25 March 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] ABC obtained travel insurance from ZZB for a trip to [a country] between 4 October and 6 November 2011. Section 3 of the policy (baggage & personal items) provi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 365 APPLICANT EG and SG RESPONDENT BT and MT The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons [1] EG and SG claim that their neighbours, BT and MT, have erected screens in BT and MT’s property near the parties’ joint fence. EG and SG find these unattractive and aesthetically displeasing. EG and SG also object that BT and MT have
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 398 APPLICANT OD FIRST RESPONDENT MW SECOND RESPONDENT FW The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed against both respondents. Reasons 1. In May 2022 OD and his husband were gifted a $1000.00 voucher for [restaurant] in [suburb]. The voucher was to expire in May 2023. OD says they tried to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 196 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT FQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. The applicant purchased a bed from the respondent in December 2020. The applicant was unhappy saying there was a strong odour coming from the bedhead. She immediately complained about it but not being happy that the respondent did n...