Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11241 items matching your search terms

  1. ZQ v S Ltd and others [2024] NZDT 707 (12 August 2024) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...the process of powder coating? 6. When two parties reach agreement about, for example, one party providing services in exchange for a fee, a legally binding contract arises. The contract’s terms are those agreed at the time the contract is formed. If terms in writing are presented and agreed to, then those are the terms, and if no written terms are provided, the terms are those agreed to or obviously implied to make the contract work. The Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) implies g...

  2. MD v UI [2023] NZDT 694 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...Collections Unit of the District Court and discuss enforcement. Contact details are on the back of this order. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 21 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

  3. NW v LO [2023] NZDT 699 (15 December 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...12. It is also noted NW did not provide evidence to support the value of the items claimed. 13. The claim is accordingly dismissed for failure of proof. Referee: DTR Edwards Date: 15 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

  4. ZM v TU & D Ltd [2024] NZDT 222 (21 March 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

    ...entitle TU to costs. So, his counterclaim which was limited to costs is dismissed. 16. In conclusion, the claim and the counter-claim are dismissed. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 21 March 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  5. N Trust v NE [2023] NZDT 210 (24 May 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...Referee: C Hawes Date: 24 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

  6. TT v UN [2023] NZDT 439 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...the hearing are not able to be awarded by the Tribunal, except in particular circumstances which do not apply here. The counter-claim is therefore dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 21 September 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

  7. [2015] NZEmpC 92 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 426 KB]

    ...judgments and Court of Appeal decision [29] The restraint of trade [37] Categories of documents and behaviour which would amount to breach [42] Documents accessed – discussion (a) Tutty documents (b) Allegation relating to customer data and information which Mr Powell accessed from his computer for customers for whom he no longer had responsibility (c) Allegation that Mr Powell accessed sensitive files relating to Hally’s budget and business records [47] [47]

  8. KT & others v ON & UN [2019] NZDT 1564 (6 March 2019) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...23. LQ is liable to ON for $1365.65. 24. In summing up ON and UN are liable to LQ for $940.00 and LQ is liable to ON $1365.00. This means LQ is to pay ON $425.00. Referee: C Murphy Date: 6 March 2019 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to app...

  9. AAF and AAG v ZZU [2010] NZDT 45 (26 February 2010) [pdf, 71 KB]

    ...property; (ii) any damage or injury to any, property; and (iii) the recovery of any property. [9] The Injury Prevention Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 2001 gives the Accident Compensation Corporation exclusive jurisdiction over claims for damages arising directly or indirectly form personal injury. [10] The claim falls outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. [11] The Applicants have requested a refund of the filing fee. That is an administration cost and...

  10. CX-v-XC-Law-Firm-2015-NZDT-885-16-July-2015 [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...reached at mediation. CX signed the mediation settlement on 11 March and confirmed it the following day, but has subsequently sought to challenge it and continue with an appeal. [4] XC Law Firm have invoiced $5,045.55 for these services and CX requests a declaration of non-liability for that amount and for contractual interest added. XC Law Firm claim contractual interest of $1,068.97 to the date of the Tribunal hearing and submitted a counter-claim for payment of $5,742.47 inclu...