Search Results

1. Timmo v ICL NZ Limited (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Mr Timmo’s claim is an Information Privacy Principle 6 case (access to personal information). Specifically, Mr Timmo alleges that ICL NZ Ltd interfered with his privacy when it responded to Mr Timmo’s requests for his personal information made on 7 August and 8 September 2020. [2] Mr Timmo complained to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and, subsequently, on 28 April 2021 filed his claim in the Tribunal. [3] There has been no action...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 57 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...Hapü within six months of the signing of the media- tion agreement. It is expected the governing body, Te Röpü Matua, will have the robust mandate required by the claims process to effectively par- ticipate throughout. The hapü have also formed a new claims committee Te Röpü Whenua, comprising three members from both former claims. They will ensure their claims are particularised and filed as required by the Tribunal under the new approach. This agreement is of importance...

3. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation [2025] NZACC 164 [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...show this email was an application for review in respect to reviews 8243375 and 8249401. [6] The Reviewer concluded review application 8243375 lodged on or about 7 July 2024 did not identify any decision by the Corporation. From the available information, the review appeared to relate to transportation and a prior request for a 4x4 wheeler bike. There was a sequence of emails between the Corporation and Mr Chalecki, but in the context of the Corporation having indicated that it wa...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...many days per year it has allocated to a full-time carer for support. Once the Ministry receives notification, it sends out the Carer Support form to the full-time carer for the full- time carer and support carer to complete and return when they claim for payment of Carer Support. 2. Payment of Carer Support is through Sector Operations, a shared payment agency that administers payments on behalf of the Ministry and all District Health Boards (DHBs). Generally, if a client is un...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 58 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Kynaston and H Khan, counsel for defendant Judgment: 30 March 2022 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 4) OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for further and better particulars) Introduction [1] The plaintiff has filed a statement of claim challenging a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The claim follows the plaintiff’s dismissal from 1 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382 (Member Beck). An amended statement of claim was subs...

6. AS v YC Ltd [2022] NZDT 75 (9 June 2022) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...teleconference. As calls made to the number provided went unanswered, the hearing proceeded in their absence. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: K. Edwards Date: 9 June 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. MD v EQ [2024] NZDT 592 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...crossing and also riding further from his car (eg 1.5m) the collision would not have occurred, and he would not have sustained damage to his vehicle. 9. Rule 7.2 is a legally bound duty that drivers must follow. The [International driving website] information and the [NZ driving website] information is provided for cyclists to ride more safely but they are not New Zealand law. One might argue it was prudent for MD to be taking account of these safe riding guides, but they are not legall...

8. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Reviewable Decisions) [2025] NZACC 061 [pdf, 811 KB]

   ...self-represented L Hawes-Gandar for the respondent Judgment: 9 April 2025 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D L HENARE [Reviewable decisions – ss 6, 134(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This appeal arises from the appellant’s requests for funding for dental treatment/veneers and Microsoft Office software subscription. [2] The Reviewer declined jurisdiction on the basis the review applications did not relate to any reviewable decisions by the Corporati...

9. Gray v Ministry for Children (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...following terms: Commissioner’s opinion: • application of principle(s) • adverse consequences • interference with privacy No opinion, complaint withdrawn – section 71(1)(d). Principle 6 and Principle 7 – No final view formed. N/A No final view formed. Mr Gray’s claim [7] In these proceedings filed with the Tribunal on 30 November 2017 Mr Gray alleges the Ministry for Children breached information privacy principles 6 and 7. Mr Gray also allege...

10. CP Ltd v ES [2022] NZDT 193 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...failed to do so in a reasonable time, ES is entitled to pay a third party to supply and install doors and windows for her cabin and recover that cost from CP Ltd under section 32(a)(ii)(A). 13. At the second hearing, ES provided evidence in the form of a written quotation from a joinery supplier to show that the cost of supply and installation of doors and windows for the cabin will be $5554.50 (that was the lowest of three quotations presented). Was the cabin of acceptable quality...