Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...many days per year it has allocated to a full-time carer for support. Once the Ministry receives notification, it sends out the Carer Support form to the full-time carer for the full- time carer and support carer to complete and return when they claim for payment of Carer Support. 2. Payment of Carer Support is through Sector Operations, a shared payment agency that administers payments on behalf of the Ministry and all District Health Boards (DHBs). Generally, if a client is un...

2. Gray v Ministry for Children (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...following terms: Commissioner’s opinion: • application of principle(s) • adverse consequences • interference with privacy No opinion, complaint withdrawn – section 71(1)(d). Principle 6 and Principle 7 – No final view formed. N/A No final view formed. Mr Gray’s claim [7] In these proceedings filed with the Tribunal on 30 November 2017 Mr Gray alleges the Ministry for Children breached information privacy principles 6 and 7. Mr Gray also allege...

3. CP Ltd v ES [2022] NZDT 193 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...failed to do so in a reasonable time, ES is entitled to pay a third party to supply and install doors and windows for her cabin and recover that cost from CP Ltd under section 32(a)(ii)(A). 13. At the second hearing, ES provided evidence in the form of a written quotation from a joinery supplier to show that the cost of supply and installation of doors and windows for the cabin will be $5554.50 (that was the lowest of three quotations presented). Was the cabin of acceptable quality...

4. SP v GC Ltd [2024] NZDT 500 (17 June 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...costs to remedy the problems with SP’s roof were $3,029.00 ($529.00 plus $2,500.00). For these reasons I order that GC Ltd is liable to pay SP $3,029.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 17 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. EI v SB & HS [2015] NZDT 1437 (28 October 2015) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...consisting of “approximately sixty current customers who are on month to month hosting agreements.” 3. The applicant company (EI), who was represented by QU, expressed an interest in submitting a tender for the assets and sought further information from HS. In furtherance of this HS sent to EI a confidentiality agreement and the terms and conditions for the tender. 4. QU, on behalf of EI, signed the confidentiality agreement on 8 December 2014. The other party to the agreemen...

6. EX v IO [2022] NZDT 10 (2 March 2022) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...found EX owns the scooter, I do not need to consider the second question. 8. For the above reasons the claim is dismissed. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: L Thompson Date: 2 March 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

7. Youngman v Waikato District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...settled by agreement in April 2012. That agreement provided that it was made in full and final settlement of all matters between the parties arising out of any intended or actual employment relationship. [6] On 25 November 2013, Mr Youngman made a request to WDHB, pursuant to information privacy principle 6, seeking his personal files, files relating to the tenure of his employment, any material relating to the disestablishment of his position, subsequent negotiations and settlement, a...

8. Brown v New Zealand Post Ltd (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...teleconference Mr Brown said his claim is “clear enough” and described NZ Post’s application for particulars as “rubbish”. Mr Brown chose not to file any submissions. [18] In a decision dated 1 December 2016 the Tribunal granted NZ Post’s request for particulars and ordered Mr Brown to file by 16 December 2016 an amended statement of claim that provided sufficient particulars to enable NZ Post to be fairly informed of the case to be met. 13 13 See Brown v NZ Post L...

9. L Ltd v CT [2023] NZDT 229 (15 September 2023) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...refile this application if the applicant obtains clear evidence the respondent does in fact, operate the restaurant. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 15 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. TE & DJ Ltd v EX [2022] NZDT 122 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...The Tribunal has no power to hear or determine claims for personal injury or exemplary damages. 9. Accordingly, both claims are dismissed. Referee: P McKinstry Date: 1 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...