Search Results

1. TT v JN [2024] NZDT 344 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...have failed to prove that it is more likely than not that JN was driving without reasonable care and skill. 10. The claim by TT and J Ltd is therefore dismissed. Referee: K L Hoult Date: 15 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

2. TI v UB [2025] NZDT 47 (31 March 2025) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...Tribunal unless exceptional circumstances apply which do not apply on the facts of this case. No award is therefore made to reimburse TI for that cost. K Cowie Disputes Tribunal Referee 31 March 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. ID v G Ltd & Ors [2025] NZDT 160 (9 May 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...on or before 30 May 2025. 2. R Ltd is to pay U Ltd $15,000.00 on or before 30 May 2025. Reasons 1. ID engaged G Ltd to paint the roof, fascia and garage door of her home. She also engaged F Ltd to supply and install a scaffold working platform and edge protection, for the painters. On 7 December 2022 a working platform and edge protection was installed by F Ltd. Between 8 and 12 December 2022 the painting work was completed by G Ltd. On 16 December 2022, the scaffold working pla...

4. Needham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Binding effect of review decision) [2023] NZACC 146 [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...cover for an infection following hip replacement surgery on 10 August 2012. The date of the treatment injury is 21 August 2014, which is the date that Mrs Needham sought treatment for the symptoms of the treatment injury. [7] In 2015, Mrs Needham requested ACC funded assistance for the boiler system at her home. In her letter of 20 July 2015, she said she was unable to lift the 20 kilogram bags of wood pellets up to chest height to load into the hopper. She said that the costs of...

5. Litchfield & Wells [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission from Marie Litchfield and Graham Wells in response to the assessor’s report. The submission from Alan Light. The assessor’s report dated 19 November 2009. The letter from Laura Tait of the...

6. Holt & Ors as Trustees of the Kahala Trust v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...saddle flashings. Therefore they considered the membrane installer was required to ensure weathertightness by using upstands at various junctions. The junctions between the waterproofing membrane and the block work were in their opinion poorly formed and this resulted in water Page | 6 infiltrating deck areas at the junction of the membrane and column upstand. [13] Both Mr Nevill and Mr Maiden also agreed that the membrane installer had not complied with the require...

7. [2021] NZREADT 55 – Lammas v Real Estate Agents Authority (6 December 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...Tribunal). The covering email stated that $30,000 was overdue and the failure to pay would result in legal proceedings. [21] The Lammases replied by email on the same day. They were referring correspondence from the Freears to the new agency. They requested a copy of the recording taken by Ms Freear of Mr Lammas while he was standing at the front door of his private property. 5 [22] Mr Freear responded by email on 24 December 2019. He said the matter was not with the n...

8. [2010] NZEmpC 113 Service and Food Workers Union & Ors v OCS Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...the second plaintiffs transferred to OCS as their new employer on the same terms and conditions of employment. So although the identity of the second plaintiffs’ employer changed as did their work, the terms and conditions under which they performed these duties have continued, at least for a short period. [3] The history of relevant events in this case is as follows. Before 1 July 2010, cleaning work at Massey’s sites in Albany, Palmerston North and Wellington was carried...

9. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 66 KB]

   UNITED NATIONS CERD International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination Distr. GENERAL CERD/C/SR.1822 8 August 2007 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION Seventy-first session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 1822nd MEETING Held at the Palais Wilson, Geneva, on Thursday, 2 August 2007, at 10 a.m. Chairperson: Mr. de GOUTTES CONTENTS CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS, COMMENTS AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY STA...

10. LCRO 236/2017 HC and CI v PR (10 December 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...High Court. [7] This decision necessarily proceeds on the basis of the materials that were before the Committee, and a determination of unsatisfactory conduct that cannot be overturned by this Office on review, whatever alternate view might be formed as to the propriety of the unsatisfactory conduct determination or the complainants’ veracity. [8] For an order to be made pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act, there must be evidence that supports the complainants’ claim to compens...