12687 items matching your search terms
...compensation. The second determination made an award of costs against Able Owl. [2] Able Owl elected to challenge the whole of both determinations in this Court and a hearing de novo was sought. The pleadings are contained in an amended statement of claim dated 17 September 2014 and a statement of defence to that 1 Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 329 (substantive); Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland...
...Principle 6, he also interfered with Mr Heidenbluth’s privacy. [6] Mr Schubach, on the other hand, challenges the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to hear the case. He relies on two documents signed by Mr Heidenbluth on 8 November 2010 in which (so it is claimed) Mr Heidenbluth agreed that the venue for all legal disputes between Mr Heidenbluth and Mr Schubach is to be Cologne, specifically the Regional Court of Cologne. [7] Before addressing these competing claims reference must be mad...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 28 APPLICANT LK RESPONDENT H Ltd t/a TT c/- X Ltd The Tribunal orders: LK’s claim against H Ltd t/a TT is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This claim is about the refund of fees paid for swimming lessons. LK says they had booked swimming lessons for his daughters in term 3 (2021) at TT, [City]. They specifically want...
...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D L HENARE [Transport for independence, ss 79, 81-84, Clauses 21 and 22 First Schedule Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant, Jason Poihegatama claims funding for a 4-wheel drive vehicle so that he can participate in certain recreational activities off road, such as fishing, white baiting and hunting. Mr Poihegatama says such vehicle would assist his social rehabilitation need...
...agreement with Q Ltd and worked for them as an associate real estate agent. He began working with Q Ltd in August 2022, the contractor agreement was signed in October 2022, and his contract was terminated without notice by Q Ltd in April 2023. 2. TT claims commission payments for two properties for which he did work while working as an associate for Q Ltd. There is a dispute about the interpretation of the commission schedule contained within the signed contract. TT also claims inter...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1375 APPLICANT (respondent in counterclaim) IX Group Limited RESPONDENT UU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT (applicant in counterclaim) OADN Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: IX Group Limited is to pay OADN Limited $5,459.63 by Friday 30 October 2020. IX Group Limited’s claim is dismissed. Reason...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 230 APPLICANT SS RESPONDENT SH The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim is dismissed. Counterclaim: SS is to pay SH $3,000.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] SS engaged SH to install a “flat-pack” kitchen in her home. The work was done, but the parties do not agree on the price that SS is liable to pay SH for the work....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1555 APPLICANT LO RESPONDENT BH Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. BH Ltd is to pay LO $2,700.00 by 5 pm Friday 23 August 2019. 2. BH Ltd is to collect the sofa suite (the 3-seater, 2-seater and 2 single armchairs) within five working days of payment being made to LO in accordance with order 1. above. If BH Lt...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1524 APPLICANTS BS and NE RESPONDENT RB Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. RB Ltd is to pay BS and NE $2,270.00 by 4pm on 11 May 2017. 2. BS and NE are to transfer the ownership of the car to RB Ltd at the time payment is made. Reasons 1. BS and NE bought a car on Trademe from a seller known as “C”, for...