Search Results

1. Harris v Department of Corrections [2013] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...satisfied that the interim orders should be made permanent. The terms of our final non-publication orders are set out at the conclusion of this decision. [7] We turn now to a separate but related matter. Ms Reddy drew attention to the fact that at the request of Mr Harris, the bundle of documents at pp 001 and 002 contains copies of the backing sheet to the indictment in R v Harris (High Court Whangarei T5/83) in which Mr Harris was charged with two counts of murder. Following a jury...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 38 Kennedy v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...TAMARIKI – MINISTRY FOR CHILDREN [2021] NZEmpC 38 [30 March 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 106/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove matter to the Employment Court BETWEEN SUSAN MARGARET KENNEDY Applicant AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF ORANGA TAMARIKI – MINISTRY FOR CHILDREN Respondent Hearing:...

3. MQ v X Ltd & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 72 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 72 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT X Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) Z Insurance The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. MQ owns a 1988 [vehicle]. The vehicle has a targa-style removable hard top roof. The roof is attached to the vehicle with hex (Allen key) bolts....

4. MO v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 367 (20 June 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 367 APPLICANT MO RESPONDENT D Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay MO $2,488.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] MO purchased from a supermarket a [snack] manufactured by D Ltd, represented by MC. Embedded in it was a date pit which, when MO bit on it on 17 January 2024, caused breakage...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 28 Harvery Norman v Boult [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...plaintiff as a computer repair technician at its Ashburton store until his dismissal for redundancy in September 2009. In 2011, the defendant commenced proceedings in the Authority alleging, amongst other things, unjustifiable dismissal. That claim was dismissed by the Authority1 which subsequently issued a costs determination.2 1 [2012] NZERA Christchurch 96. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff $3,500 for costs and $...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 43 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 43 EMPC 321/2023 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN SIMON MUTONHORI Plaintiff AND WAIROA DISTRICT COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Mutonhori, plaintiff in person C McGuinness, coun...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 180 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 180 EMPC 402/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a strike out order AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN KARL MALCOLM First Plaintiff AND CAROL WARING Second Plaintiff AND PHILLIPA MCDERMOTT Third Plaintiff...

8. DG v WV LCRO 14 / 2011 (24 June 2011) [pdf, 100 KB]

   LCRO 14/2011 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the National Standards Committee BETWEEN MR DG of Auckland Applicant AND MR WV of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Application for review [1] The National Standards Committee declined to uphold complaints...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 166 Able Owl XL Ltd v Gladden [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...compensation. The second determination made an award of costs against Able Owl. [2] Able Owl elected to challenge the whole of both determinations in this Court and a hearing de novo was sought. The pleadings are contained in an amended statement of claim dated 17 September 2014 and a statement of defence to that 1 Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 329 (substantive); Gladden v Able Owl XL Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland...

10. LK v H Ltd [2022] NZDT 28 (1 March 2022) [pdf, 181 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 28 APPLICANT LK RESPONDENT H Ltd t/a TT c/- X Ltd The Tribunal orders: LK’s claim against H Ltd t/a TT is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This claim is about the refund of fees paid for swimming lessons. LK says they had booked swimming lessons for his daughters in term 3 (2021) at TT, [City]. They specifically want...