Search Results

1. [2017] EmpC 92 P v A [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...challenge in which an interim prohibition on publication order is in place. Accordingly, the parties’ names in this case have been anonymised pending the outcome of P’s application for a permanent order. [2] P filed the statement of claim commencing his challenge on 29 March 2017. The Court records disclose that the statement of claim was served on the defendant by registered post on 30 March 2017. The defendant did not file a statement of defence to the statement o...

2. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1639 APPLICANT ET and JT RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim for $10,420.73 is dismissed; and The Tribunal declares that ET and JT are not liable to pay F Ltd’s invoice number 0045 dated 27 January 2021 for $18,828.38. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. JT is added as a joint appli...

3. FT v BF Ltd [2023] NZDT 793 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 793 APPLICANT FT RESPONDENT BF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. BF Ltd is to pay FT the sum of $13,643.10 on or before 31 January 2024. 2. BF Ltd’s claim for damages is dismissed, and the claim for the removal of the veranda is struck out. Reasons: 1. FT purchased a property in [street] from BF Ltd. Settlement was on 30 Novem...

4. SC v CX [2024] NZDT 51 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 51 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: CX is to pay SC the sum of $650.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On Monday 17 April 2023, SC purchased from CX a [car] for $11,000.00 after seeing it advertised [online], and after viewing it and taking it for a test drive. 2. Two days after SC purchased...

5. Pawnbroker duties

   Keep a pawnbrokers record You must keep a pawnbrokers record for all goods you acquire in your business. This must contain: the identity of the pledger including their name, contact address, and contact phone number the form of identity you used to verify the pledger’s identity (this can be verified by seeing the person’s authorised identification\), date of birth, and that they are 18 years or over the pledger’s signature a description of the goods including their serial number or unique...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Licences & certificates >
   3. Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers & Pawnbrokers >
   4. Your duties

6. [2017] NZEnvC 198 Lau v Auckland Council [pdf, 292 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Appearances: Hearing: Judgment: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC I q 8 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under s316 of the Act AUGUSTINE LAU (ENV-2017 -AKL-000123) Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL . Respondent Environment Judge DA Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s279(1)(a) of the Act Applicant in person D Collins for Auckland Council on th...

7. Mayfair Street Units v Spargo [pdf, 83 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Mayfair Street Units v Spargo File No: TRI 2009-101-000015 to 18/ DBH 05319, 05320, 05322 & 05326 Court: WHT Adjudicator: C Ruthe Date of Decision: 21 December 2009 Background This claim relates to two consolidated claims whereby the respondents involved in both claims are identical. This decision thereby considered issues of liability and apportionment together. The first claim relates to Unit 11 owned by Mr and Mrs Franklin which was for $255,049.09...

8. Ye v Wang [2015] NZIACDT 23 (13 March 2015) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...stated: “It is alleged that the Complainant paid $500 to [the Adviser’s practice] ... Upon inquiry, the Authority responded on 23 October 2014 that it possessed no evidence of such payment; and confirmed that the Complainant did not respond to a request of 12 April 2013 for the same. On that basis, the allegation contained in the Complaint Form remains no more than that, and there is no evidence of any sort that such payment was ever made by the Complainant. It may be that he was co...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 175 Invacare New Zealand Ltd v Pyne [pdf, 193 KB]

   INVACARE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v DARREN PYNE [2022] NZEmpC 175 [22 September 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 175 EMPC 231/2022 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN INVACARE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Applicant AND DARREN PYNE Respondent EMPC 212/2022 IN THE MA...

10. Manuirirangi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Waiokura Te Kauae blocks, Section 27-29, 33,34, 40-44 and Section 111 Block VII Waimate Survey District and Lot 1 Deposited Plan 5603 (2013) 312 Aotea MB 104 (312 AOT 104) [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...Tōpu Trust seeks an order for the alienation of the Waiokura Te Kauae lands from the Parininihi ki Waitotara Incorporation (“PKW”) to the Trust for the benefit of Ngāti Tu hapū, and for the upkeep of Waiokura Marae. In short Mr Manuirirangi requests that the Court order PKW to transfer title of the lands to the Trust by way of gift or alternatively for some nominal amount that may involve an exchange of shares. [2] PKW opposes the application and says that it has wider respo...