Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 28 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...holiday pay. It is alleged that the Authority made an order which would unjustly enrich Mr Pan. [6] Juyi accordingly seeks a stay of the order requiring it to pay holiday entitlements pending the hearing of its challenge. It asserts that its claim is strong, and that were it to succeed in the hearing of its challenge having paid the contested sum to Mr Pan, recovery would be problematic because he would be unlikely to voluntarily return the monies paid. [7] Mr Pan filed a notic...

2. WQ Ltd v ND Ltd [2020] NZDT 1323 (10 November 2020) [pdf, 152 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1323 APPLICANT WQ Limited RESPONDENT ND Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: ND Limited is to pay WQ Limited $15,548.84 by Friday 27 November 2020. Reasons 1. WQ Limited were engaged as a subcontractor for ND Limited to do the plumbing work at [redacted] School. WQ are claiming the amount owing under unpaid invoices being $10,33

3. OIA-103324.pdf [pdf, 779 KB]

   Section (9)(2)(a) Tena koe- FIMRIPII Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@Justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Official Information Act request: Concurrent and cumulative sentences Thank you for your email of 15 March 2023 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), documents produced or received by the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) regarding concurrent and cumulative sentences since 1 January 2...

4. Karena v Te Koau A Trust - Te Koau A (2017) 61 Takitimu MB 25 (61 TKT 25) [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20170004218 UNDER Section 43 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF TE KOAU A WERO KARENA Applicant TE KOAU A TRUST Respondent Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 19 July 2017 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Solicitors: G W Calver 305 Ma...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...bonus, and that the claim for entitlements under the MW Act were brought in time. In a judgment of 11 December 2015, I extended leave for this purpose, and Marra accordingly initiated its challenge. 3 [6] Subsequently the Authority declined an application made by Mr Pretorius to remove the various remuneration issues to the Court. 4 The context within which this application arose involved a range of claims; Mr Pretorius had brought actions for unpaid monies but he had also raise...

6. [2017] EmpC 92 P v A [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...challenge in which an interim prohibition on publication order is in place. Accordingly, the parties’ names in this case have been anonymised pending the outcome of P’s application for a permanent order. [2] P filed the statement of claim commencing his challenge on 29 March 2017. The Court records disclose that the statement of claim was served on the defendant by registered post on 30 March 2017. The defendant did not file a statement of defence to the statement o...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 146 Rimene v Doherty and Natusch Group Limited [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...I make about the documentation presented on behalf of the plaintiff is that it is irregular and does not follow the prescribed procedure provided for in the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations). Where directions or interlocutory applications are sought, these should be contained within a correctly intituled form of application following the format of Form 2A in Sch 1 of the Regulations. It is unsatisfactory for the application to be included in the body of a memoran...

8. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1639 APPLICANT ET and JT RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim for $10,420.73 is dismissed; and The Tribunal declares that ET and JT are not liable to pay F Ltd’s invoice number 0045 dated 27 January 2021 for $18,828.38. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. JT is added as a joint appli...

9. FT v BF Ltd [2023] NZDT 793 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 793 APPLICANT FT RESPONDENT BF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. BF Ltd is to pay FT the sum of $13,643.10 on or before 31 January 2024. 2. BF Ltd’s claim for damages is dismissed, and the claim for the removal of the veranda is struck out. Reasons: 1. FT purchased a property in [street] from BF Ltd. Settlement was on 30 Novem...

10. SC v CX [2024] NZDT 51 (21 February 2024) [pdf, 131 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 51 APPLICANT SC RESPONDENT CX The Tribunal orders: CX is to pay SC the sum of $650.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On Monday 17 April 2023, SC purchased from CX a [car] for $11,000.00 after seeing it advertised [online], and after viewing it and taking it for a test drive. 2. Two days after SC purchased...