Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12669 items matching your search terms

  1. TO Ltd v TX [2020] NZDT 1360 (11 December 2020) [pdf, 255 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1360 APPLICANT TO Limited RESPONDENT TX The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: TO Limited is to pay $7040.48 directly to TX on or before 22 January 2021. Reasons 1. TX engaged TO Ltd (‘TO’) to provide landscaping services at his family’s home. A detailed written scope of works was pr...

  2. UB v OZ LCRO 11 / 2012 (11 October 2012) [pdf, 111 KB]

    LCRO 11/2012 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 5 BETWEEN CCO (UB) Applicant AND OZ Respondent DECISION Background [1] The Practitioner, OZ, undertook work for UB’s business, CCO (the Applicant) throughout November 2010 to February 2011, but did not complete the work contemplated by the retainer a...

  3. [2024] NZEmpC 135 Chantama v McKerchar Lamb Limited and other(s) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...first defendant and in person for the second defendant Judgment: 29 July 2024 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M S KING Background [1] The first defendant has applied for costs following the discontinuance of the plaintiff’s claim in this Court. Despite the discontinuance, costs remain outstanding, and efforts to resolve the issue between the parties have been unsuccessful. [2] On 12 July 2023 the Court granted the plaintiff’s application for leave to fi...

  4. Nikora - Tuhoe - Te Uru Taumatua (2023) 292 Waiariki MB 6 (292 WAR 6) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...2023, the directions were issued to the Pae Tukutuku to ascertain whether Mr Nikora wanted the Court to forego the legal analysis from Counsel to Assist. [6] By way of email sent on 6 March 2023, Mr Nikora confirmed that he wished to forego the request for legal advice, supporting a decision being made based on the 292 Waiariki MB 8 information before the Court, and sought to extend the breadth of information he sought from the TUT. [7] This decision is therefore based on the...

  5. [2021] NZEnvC 135 Caradoc-Davies v Clearwater [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...application for declaration under s311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TUDOR HENRY CARADOC- DAVIES HAMISH FORRESTER GRAEME DESMOND GRANGER JOHN EDGAR SAYCE PARKER (ENV-2017-CHC-000032) (ENV-2017-CHC-000033) (ENV-2017-CHC-000034) Applicants AND STEVEN ROBERT CLEARWATER, JACQUELINE ANN CLEARWATER and BRIAN PATRICK HAILES as TRUSTEES OF THE PENINSULA HOLDINGS TRUST STEVE CLEARWATER CONTRACTING LIMITED Respondents AND DUNEDIN CITY COUN...

  6. Khan v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...person [35] The definition is directed to administrative tasks, such as keeping records, maintaining financial records and the like. [36] The definition deals specifically with the role a non-licensed person may have in the process of preparing applications for visas. They may record information “on any form, application, request, or claim on behalf and under the direction of another person”. [37] The natural meaning of those words is that the unlicensed person relying on the “cl...

  7. WC & SD v CT Ltd [2022] NZDT 198 (21 November 2022) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  8. BM v NE [2023] NZDT 612 (6 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 612 APPLICANT BM RESPONDENT NE The Tribunal orders: NE is to pay BM $21,494.93 on or before the 27th day of November 2023. The money may be paid into account [redacted]. Reasons: Introduction: 1. On the 13th of May 2021 BM purchased a house from NE. 2. Prior to purchase BM noticed some textured walls throughout a large por...

  9. Galvin [2011] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the 2 eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached submission. The letter from Derek Sharp of...

  10. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Code of Claimant's Rights) [2024] NZACC 020 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...ACC Claimants’ Rights - s 40; Appeals process - s 149(3); Decision – s 6(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 15 June 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, finding that the Corporation’s letter of 18 November 2022 was not a reviewable decision under the Act. Background [2] From December 2019, Dr Van Wey Lovatt was diagnosed with...