12669 items matching your search terms
...OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 228 EMPC 348/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an extension of time to file a statement of defence BETWEEN PAUL HARDY Plaintiff AND PRECISION SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Keir, counsel for plai...
...determinations, in which he seeks to overturn the Committees findings, to this Office by email on 21 June 2016. The following day, 22 June 2016, this Office received from him both the original of his application, and the filing fee of $50. [26] He claims that by having emailed his application to this Office on 21 June 2016 he had complied with the statutory 30 working days time limit within which an application for review of a Standards Committee’s decision must be filed in thi...
...of option A under the PRA. [15] On 18 August 2014 Mrs OP requested an update and information. Ms UV replied the same day, saying that she was awaiting the Grant of the Probate. She also suggested that the trustees execute the share transfer forms as executors, but advised they may also require a copy of Probate. Ms UV confirmed she would provide a copy of probate as soon as she received it. 5 Email OP to UV (4 June 2014). 6 L...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 259 APPLICANT SU RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Tribunal orders: G Ltd is to pay the sum of $615.64 to SU on or before Wednesday, 3 April 2024. REASONS 1. In 2008, SU purchased from a third-party supplier a [cooktop] (“the Cooktop”). The Cooktop failed in June 2020 when the main dual element blew. SU purchased the r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 48 APPLICANT LG RESPONDENT OE The Tribunal orders: 1. OE is to pay LG $12,250.00 on or before 20 February 2023. 2. LG is to make available for collection by OE the spa pool she purchased from OE, provided that: i. collection shall occur at a reasonable time and date to be agreed between the parties; and ii. such da...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 128 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT NI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In May 2019, NI engaged QN to do some painting on a holiday house she and her husband owned in [Address]. QN made some suggestions about other repair work that he could do and NI agreed for him to do that work as well. 2....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 186 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EC was a customer of U Ltd and among other things had a house insurance policy with U Ltd. EC’s house comprises two units, his home and a separately tenanted flat downstairs. In 2022 U Ltd changed the house insurance policy f...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 73 APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT CE APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. At the hearing, UD was represented by his son CD. CD was the driver of the vehicle involved in a collision with CE. CD alleges he pulled up behind CE and was in traffic stopped on the [Street] in...
PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPLICANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPLICANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 178 ACR 233/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN BI Applicant AND AC...
LCRO 77/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN RV Applicant AND JH Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr RV has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee that further action in respect...