Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 185 Yang v L E Builders Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...from a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 The Authority dismissed a personal grievance filed on Mr Yang’s behalf, finding that he was a contractor rather than an employee. The challenge proceeded by way of formal proof hearing. Counsel acting for the defendant company had previously been granted leave to withdraw, and the company failed to appear. [2] The primary issue before the Court is whether, at the time Mr Yang’s engagement with...

2. ND v LB Ltd [2023] NZDT 458 (15 August 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...the price for the part of the services that it performed competently, being the measurement and the majority of the installation of the shade cloth. c. I advised the parties during the hearing that I am unable to award ND more than the amount claimed by him on his application form. This is $2,000.00. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 13. I have had regard to LB Ltd’s view that a new shade cloth would likely cost around $700.00 and that no further fittings would be require...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 135 Caradoc-Davies v Clearwater [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...application for declaration under s311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN TUDOR HENRY CARADOC- DAVIES HAMISH FORRESTER GRAEME DESMOND GRANGER JOHN EDGAR SAYCE PARKER (ENV-2017-CHC-000032) (ENV-2017-CHC-000033) (ENV-2017-CHC-000034) Applicants AND STEVEN ROBERT CLEARWATER, JACQUELINE ANN CLEARWATER and BRIAN PATRICK HAILES as TRUSTEES OF THE PENINSULA HOLDINGS TRUST STEVE CLEARWATER CONTRACTING LIMITED Respondents AND DUNEDIN CITY COUN...

4. BI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 178 [pdf, 157 KB]

   PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPLICANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPLICANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 178 ACR 233/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN BI Applicant AND AC...

5. Nikora - Tuhoe - Te Uru Taumatua (2023) 292 Waiariki MB 6 (292 WAR 6) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...2023, the directions were issued to the Pae Tukutuku to ascertain whether Mr Nikora wanted the Court to forego the legal analysis from Counsel to Assist. [6] By way of email sent on 6 March 2023, Mr Nikora confirmed that he wished to forego the request for legal advice, supporting a decision being made based on the 292 Waiariki MB 8 information before the Court, and sought to extend the breadth of information he sought from the TUT. [7] This decision is therefore based on the...

6. Young v Accident Compensation Corporation (leave to appeal to High Court) [2022] NZACC 248 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...he concurred with Dr Cliff’s opinion that Ms Young had a major obsessive compulsive disorder which she was extremely resistant to any professional therapeutic intervention. Dr Vaughan assessed that Ms Young was likely to maintain accusatory claims about many forms of treatment that she had received in the past and confabulate a significant amount of information regarding previous treatment. • On 21 November 1986, the Senior Medical Officer at Wairarapa Hospital (where Ms Yo...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 228 Hardy v Precision Solutions Ltd [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 228 EMPC 348/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an extension of time to file a statement of defence BETWEEN PAUL HARDY Plaintiff AND PRECISION SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Keir, counsel for plai...

8. LCRO 144/2016 QT v UF (24 August 2018) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...determinations, in which he seeks to overturn the Committees findings, to this Office by email on 21 June 2016. The following day, 22 June 2016, this Office received from him both the original of his application, and the filing fee of $50. [26] He claims that by having emailed his application to this Office on 21 June 2016 he had complied with the statutory 30 working days time limit within which an application for review of a Standards Committee’s decision must be filed in thi...

9. GO v HO [2022] NZDT 213 (2 December 2022) [pdf, 138 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 213 APPLICANT GO RESPONDENT HO APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: HO is to pay to B Ltd the sum of $1,175.72 on or before 24 December 2022. Reasons 1. GO was stationary at the [Corner of Streets A/B] Street lights, waiting to turn right onto [Street C]. HO was approaching t...

10. KH v XS [2019] NZDT 1393 (20 August 2019) [pdf, 208 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1393 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT XS APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) APPLICANT (COUNTER- CLAIM) Z Ltd HI The Tribunal orders: 1. XS is to pay to Z Ltd the sum of $3,191.22 on or before 30 September 2019. Reasons 1. KH was proceeding down Witako Street when she struck the door of a pa...