Search Results

1. UT v DU [2023] NZDT 716 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

2. F Ltd v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 374 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 155 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...REVENUE DEPARTMENT [2020] NZEmpC 155 [30 September 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2020] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 292/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration pursuant to s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder BETWEEN KEANU HEAD Plaintiff AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE INLAND REVENUE DE...

4. HL & UL v FZ [2024] NZDT 730 (5 December 2024) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...also no longer has any footage. The manager of R Ltd confirmed to B Ltd that the available footage is the only footage of anyone circling UL’s car or acting in an unusual manner near her car on 22 November 2022. 5. The issues to resolve this claim are: a. Did FZ cause the damage to UL’s car? b. If so, what is the fair and reasonable cost of remedying the damage for which she is liable? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Did FZ cause the damage to UL’s car? 6. FZ...

5. RU v MW LCRO 293 / 2011 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...for his time [was] fair and reasonable”. It did not discuss the question of whether or not there were in this case “special circumstances”. [11] Regarding the non-application for legal aid issue the Committee referred to the Practitioner forming the view that the LSA was unlikely to fund the Applicant’s proposed litigation, and that it was a “fair assessment given the background to [the] proceedings”. The Committee found that no criticism could be made of the stance tak...

6. TTC v BL [2013] NZIACDT 25 (4 April 2013) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 4 April 2013 2 MINUTE Introduction [1] Mr TTC engaged Ms BL to provide immigration assistance. [2] In essence, he has complained Ms BL failed to lodge an application when she said she would. [3] Ms BL said she progressed her instructions as quickly as Mr TTC provided the information and documentation she required for that to happen; and he paid the fees. [4] The Tribunal has to determine whe...

7. NZ Domaine Investments Ltd v Tauranga City Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 81 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2012-100-000106 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 BETWEEN NZ DOMAINE INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SHANE EDWARD PLUMMER Second Claimant AND TAURANGA CITY COUNCIL First Respondent (DISCONTINUED) AND WARWICK BROUGHTON Second Respondent AND BUBBLEHEAD LIMITED (WATERPROOFING SYSTEMS 1997 LIMITED) Third Respondent (DISCONTINUED) AND AQUATIGHT ROOFING SERVICES LIMITE

8. [2021] NZACC 127 - Jones v ACC (11 August 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 127 ACA 02/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO RECALL DECISION BETWEEN CRAIG RICHARD JONES Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the Papers Appearances: Applicant in person D Tuiqereqere for the respondent Judgment: 11 August 2021 _____________________________...

9. LL v BT [2022] NZDT (24 March 2022) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 20 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: BT is to pay $1,400.00 to LL on or before Monday 18 April 2022. Reasons: 1. LL loaned $1,400 to BT so she could pay her rent and avoid eviction from her tenancy. The money was transferred directly into BT’s landlord’s account. BT agreed to repay the money once s...

10. Morton v Marshall [pdf, 46 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 3483 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JAMES RICHARD MORTON and JENNIFER DIANE MORTON Claimants AND MICHAEL MARSHALL First Respondent Hearing: 13 February 2006 Appearances: Mr & Mrs Morton in person No appearance by Mr Marshall Determination: 16 June 2006 DETERMINATION INDEX Background .............................................................