Search Results

1. OQ v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 660 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...[car] in for repairs in January 2022. N Ltd initially advised her that a new timing chain kit was required. After further inquiries, N Ltd advised her that she needed a new motor. 6. OQ had mechanical breakdown cover up to $5,000.00. She informed N Ltd that she could not afford a new engine, so N Ltd endeavoured to locate a secondhand one through [second hand parts dealer]. N Ltd was unable to do so, and in April OQ’s partner advised N Ltd that he had searched online and fou...

2. RF v CN LCRO 254/2012 (3 November 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...[6] On [Date] Mr QW, the lawyer for the real estate agency, emailed Ms CN asking her to obtain instructions from Mr DS as to whether he could identify the agent with whom he says he discussed the property. [7] Mr RF was never advised that this request had been made. There is no evidence that Ms CN contacted Mr DS, nor is there any evidence of her having replied to Mr QW. [8] Mr RF had difficulty in paying the legal fees charged. On [Date] he entered into a deed of acknowledgement o...

3. BD v AN [2020] NZDT 1333 (22 June 2020) [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...finding that he had done so. 15. For these reasons, the claim is awarded in full, but the counterclaim is unable to succeed. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 22 June 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply

4. B Ltd v D Ltd [2025] NZDT 267 (18 June 2025) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...the Tribunal is not able to make an award of costs except in very limited circumstances that do not apply here (S.43 Disputes Tribunal Act). J F Tunnicliffe Disputes Tribunal Referee 18 June 2025- Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. BN & IN v X Ltd [2021] NZDT 1616 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...several quotations from the [bank] but as all the quoted premiums were too high, so he decided to look into just insuring the life of IN. 2. As a result of this, BN discussed the issue with a [bank] insurance agent, who filled in the proposal form dated the 23/11/2006. This included full disclosure as to IN medical condition and all her medication. 3. A quotation and a letter of special acceptance was prepared by X Ltd and given to BN and IN but they did not accept that quotation...

6. HRRT Statement of Reply (Privacy) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...for this reply. Please choose one and give the details.  Email  Postal address Email address __________________________________________________________________________ THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Statement of Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ under section 98 of the Privacy Act 2020 and wish to file a ‘Statement of Reply’ in response to the allegations made against you. Completing this form •...

7. Ryang v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 282 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000060 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 21 BETWEEN CHUN HEE RYANG Claimant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (FORMERLY NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND DAVID LEE Second Respondent AND THEOTESTO REYES Third Respondent AND PLASTER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND PATON ROOFING SERVICES LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND WISE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RUSSELL MATTHEWS

8. [2021] NZACC v Jones (5 August 2021) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Jones to the Law Society affects this recall application. Notably, Mr Jones presented no evidence to show that he had asked for an extension of time for filing submissions to await the outcome of this complaint. There is no reference to any such request in the 2019 Leave Decision. In reality, Mr Jones had more than eight months to file his written submissions in support of his application for leave. When he did not do so, he cannot now complain that the Authority acted unreasonably...

9. Atkins v Corrections (Discovery) [2025] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...However, category F is somewhat distinct from categories C, D, H and L as it regards inherently system-level information regarding the defendant’s implementation of 8 the relief ordered by the High Court in December 2023.18 The discovery request in this category includes “reports to the Executive Leadership Team, the Chief Executive and the Minister of Corrections; and communications and directions to staff regarding how they should communicate with sentenced women affected...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 177 Rimene v P J Doherty & Natusch Group Ltd [pdf, 61 KB]

    ...Doherty to proceed with his challenge out of time, those particulars will need to be provided before the Court can give directions under s 182(3)(b) of the Act as to the nature and extent of the hearing. [16] To advance the matter, the Registrar is requested to schedule a telephone directions conference with the parties in the near future to enable the Court to deal with these issues. Conceivably, one option the parties may wish to explore is joinder of both actions and proceedi...