Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 216 Q v W [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...determinations and all matters to be decided by the Employment Court. [5] The plaintiff deposed that the issue of name suppression on all the Authority’s determinations was never processed by the Authority, although she claims that it was requested on numerous occasions over the years, both verbally and in writing, but that, to date, the issue had never been addressed formally or informally by the Authority. [6] The plaintiff also applied for name suppression for all...

2. Ryang v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 282 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000060 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 21 BETWEEN CHUN HEE RYANG Claimant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (FORMERLY NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND DAVID LEE Second Respondent AND THEOTESTO REYES Third Respondent AND PLASTER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND PATON ROOFING SERVICES LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND WISE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RUSSELL MATTHEWS

3. [2012] NZEmpC 80 Premier Events Group and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...if the pleading cannot be relied on. [18] That may or may not be so but I think, on balance, that the question of prejudice is neutral as between PEGL on the one hand, and Messrs Beattie and Regan on the other. So I do not accede to PEGL’s request that the proceeding be declared to be a nullity simply because there is no prejudice to the individual parties in doing so. [19] The ultimate test to be applied by the Court is what is necessary to do justice in the particular circum...

4. RF v CN LCRO 254/2012 (3 November 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...[6] On [Date] Mr QW, the lawyer for the real estate agency, emailed Ms CN asking her to obtain instructions from Mr DS as to whether he could identify the agent with whom he says he discussed the property. [7] Mr RF was never advised that this request had been made. There is no evidence that Ms CN contacted Mr DS, nor is there any evidence of her having replied to Mr QW. [8] Mr RF had difficulty in paying the legal fees charged. On [Date] he entered into a deed of acknowledgement o...

5. Understanding-LGBTQ-effects-on-likelihoods-of-being-victimised-Factsheet.pdf [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...deprivation score, and birthplace. 3 Including being on an MSD benefit, making ACC claims, and having a PHARMAC claim. health. It comes from government agencies, Stats NZ surveys, and non-government organisations (NGOs). The data is linked together to form the IDI. This analysis sample used the anonymised data of everyone who participated in the NZCVS between 2018 and 2022 and consented to have their data transferred to the IDI.

6. OQ v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 660 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...[car] in for repairs in January 2022. N Ltd initially advised her that a new timing chain kit was required. After further inquiries, N Ltd advised her that she needed a new motor. 6. OQ had mechanical breakdown cover up to $5,000.00. She informed N Ltd that she could not afford a new engine, so N Ltd endeavoured to locate a secondhand one through [second hand parts dealer]. N Ltd was unable to do so, and in April OQ’s partner advised N Ltd that he had searched online and fou...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 7 Alatipi v CE of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...complaint [9] Prisoner X did not give evidence in the case but he was interviewed by Principal Corrections Officer, Ms Cheryl Chandler, on the day of the incident. Ms Chandler's record of the interview was typed up on a Corrections IR.07 Form 01 and signed off at 1350 hrs on 2 July 2011. Ms Chandler stated: … When we got to the Management unit [Prisoner X] gave me the following statement. On the 2nd July 2011 I [Prisoner X] was in HM 4 wing. At approximately 0835h...

8. [2021] NZACC v Jones (5 August 2021) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Jones to the Law Society affects this recall application. Notably, Mr Jones presented no evidence to show that he had asked for an extension of time for filing submissions to await the outcome of this complaint. There is no reference to any such request in the 2019 Leave Decision. In reality, Mr Jones had more than eight months to file his written submissions in support of his application for leave. When he did not do so, he cannot now complain that the Authority acted unreasonably...

9. Atkins v Corrections (Discovery) [2025] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...However, category F is somewhat distinct from categories C, D, H and L as it regards inherently system-level information regarding the defendant’s implementation of 8 the relief ordered by the High Court in December 2023.18 The discovery request in this category includes “reports to the Executive Leadership Team, the Chief Executive and the Minister of Corrections; and communications and directions to staff regarding how they should communicate with sentenced women affected...

10. BD v AN [2020] NZDT 1333 (22 June 2020) [pdf, 368 KB]

    ...finding that he had done so. 15. For these reasons, the claim is awarded in full, but the counterclaim is unable to succeed. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 22 June 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply