12666 items matching your search terms
...MELISSA BOWEN v BANK OF NEW ZEALAND [2021] NZEmpC 6 [4 February 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 6 EMPC 261/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for special leave to remove a proceeding to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for orders in respect of privileged communications BETWEEN MELISSA BOWEN Applicant AND BANK...
CAROLINE SAWYER v VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 143 [13 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2017] NZEmpC 143 EMPC 317/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a request for urgency and an application for a stay AND IN THE MATTER of an application of urgency BETWEEN CAROLINE SAWYER Applicant AND VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON Respondent Hearin...
...Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. The East Coast settlement report. (Waitangi Tribunal report) ISBN 978-1-86956-297-7 1. Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou. 2. Maori (New Zealand people)—New Zealand—Gisborne Region—Claims. 3. Ngāti Porou (New Zealand people)—Claims. [1. Tiriti o Waitangi. reo 2. Mana whenua. reo] I. Title. II. Series. 333.330899944209344—dc22 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Typeset by the Waitangi Tribunal This report was previo...
...UTUTAONGA v NORTH WESTERN FARMS LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 150 [14 September 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 150 EMPC 132/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RAYMOND AARON MARSHALL UTUTAONGA Applicant AND NORTH WESTERN FARMS LIMITED Respondent Hearing:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 264 APPLICANT DO RESPONDENT RESPONDENT INSURER TC YZ Ltd The Tribunal orders: TC is to pay $4350.00 to DO on or before 23 January 2023. Reasons 1. TC and DO were involved in a motor vehicle collision on 17 September 2022 when TC exited the driveway of her house into the path of DO’s oncoming vehicle....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 217 APPLICANT IF RESPONDENT EX The Tribunal orders: EX is to pay IF the sum of $1,757.00 on or before 2 June 2023. Reasons: 1. IF and EX were flatmates. IF is the head tenant for the property and sublet a room to EX. EX moved into the property on 17 April 2022 and moved on 4 August 2022. After he left, it took IF s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 766 APPLICANT XC RESPONDENT UD The Tribunal orders: UD shall pay XC $7,000.00 by 22 December 2023. Reasons: 1. XC purchased a [Vehicle] from UD via Facebook Marketplace on 29 August 2023 for $8,750.00. 2. On 31 August 2023, XC took the vehicle to [mechanics] for an inspection and service. [Mechanic] advised XC of numerous defe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 370 APPLICANT ES RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay the sum of $690.00 to ES on or before 17 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 23 December 2023, ES (the consumer) purchased a massage chair from D Ltd (the supplier) for $4,090.00 through credit card financing with an initial deposit of $690.00 charged to his card. Later that e...
...[1] In my judgment of 3 August 2017, I allowed a challenge regarding non-publication orders, in part, indicating that I was satisfied that it would be appropriate to make an interim order of non-publication of commercially sensitive information, and of allegations which are alleged to be irrelevant to this proceeding. 1 [2] Although counsel had drafted and provided a form of interim order for the Court’s consideration, it related only to documentary evidence, and would not...
...____________________________________________________________________ Background [1] On 2 October 2019 ACC declined cover for right knee medial compartment surgery for the appellant. [2] On 2 September 2020 the appellant’s counsel lodged a late application for review. ACC declined the late review application on 6 April 2021. [3] On 25 May the appellant argued the matter before the Reviewer. Affidavit evidence was provided, and legal submissions made. [4] On 1 June 20...