Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 145 WN v Auckland International Airport Ltd [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 145 EMPC 308/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN WN Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: A Fechney, advocate for plaintiff K Dunn, counsel for defendant...

2. [2021] NZIACDT 4 - SL v Mackintosh (4 March 2021) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...2021 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: P Moses, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Ms Angelina Gabriella Mackintosh, the adviser, acted for SL, the complainant, on a visa application, but concealed from her the decline of the application and the real reason for the decline. Nor did Ms Mackintosh make a reconsideration application she had been instructed to make, yet she falsely inferred that it had been filed....

3. FH Ltd v TS Ltd [2016] NZDT 1037 (26 September 2016) [pdf, 81 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 1037 BETWEEN FH Ltd [FH] APPLICANT AND TS Ltd [TS] RESPONDENT Date of Order: 26 September 2016 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that TS Ltd is to pay the sum of $9,200.00 to FH Ltd on or before 6 October 2016. Once payment has been made, FH Ltd is to allow TS Ltd to collect the forklift at its own cost at a mutually convenient time....

4. EX v UC [2017] NZDT 1011 (24 May 2017) [pdf, 20 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2017] NZDT 1011 BETWEEN EX APPLICANT AND UC RESPONDENT Date of Order: 24 May 2017 Referee: Referee: Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby dismisses the claim. Facts [1] Mr and Mrs EX purchased a clothes dryer from UB Limited ("UB") in April 2013. At the same time they purchased a 5-year extended warranty. The dryer has undergone three repairs during that time, onc...

5. NL & UN v ME [2022] NZDT 88 (8 June 2022) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 88 APPLICANT NL APPLICANT UN RESPONDENT ME The Tribunal orders: ME is to pay NL and UN $15,000.00 on or before Wednesday 6 July 2022. Reasons: 1. On 19 August 2020, ME provided a pre-inspection report on [Address] that NL and UN relied upon when bidding on the house. This report stated at page 15 that the concrete si...

6. LA Provider Manual Part 1 Approvals - December 2018 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Chapter 1 – Submitting an application Overview Process The diagram below illustrates the process for how applications for approval are assessed. This chapter focuses on the information submitted by the applicant. Further information requested. If not received by date given, application is returned. Application assessed and sent to Selection Committee Application received and checked it is complete Complete Not complete Complete If approved, applicant may be of...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 247 Courage & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors and EMPC 85/2022 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2024] NZEmpC 247 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out part of claim BETWEEN HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTOR...

8. Karena v Haines-Winiata - Te Koau A Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 200 (43 TKT 200) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...[2] In particular, Mr Karena refers to the landlocked status of Te Koau and his efforts, he says, to have access secured through neighbouring properties. In that context, Mr Karena has alleged that the trustees have failed to respond to his requests to discuss the terms of a lease of the land and specifically the issue of lack of access. Mr Karena further claims that the trustees’ failure to support his application for access against Big Hill Station Limited is a further groun...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 203 Fredericks v VIP Frames and Trusses Ltd [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...by an inexperienced employee. The 19 mm nail pierced the fluid sack around Mr Fredericks’s heart, a lung and liver. [2] The circumstances which followed the injury led to Mr Fredericks resigning from his employment with VIP. He commenced a claim in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) claiming he was constructively dismissed and had suffered disadvantage as a result of the unjustifiable actions of VIP. After a two- day investigation meeting the Authority held tha...

10. DO Ltd v OT Ltd [2022] NZDT 55 (28 April 2022) [pdf, 124 KB]

    Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 55 APPLICANT DO Ltd RESPONDENT OT Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT NH Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT T Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) JJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. This is a continuation of the 9 August 2021 adjourned hearing, the order at the time recorded; The dis...