Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 35 [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...one expert was not being called shortly before the hearing commenced. Experts met only during the hearing period. If documentation had been prepared on time an experts‟ conference before the hearing may have been possible and would have informed the assessor of the differing views contrary to his. This would have especially applied once he was advised as to the application of Xypex coating in lieu of paint or plaster. Calderbank letter [11] In August 2008 all the responde...

2. KB v OS [2022] NZDT 287 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT OS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LP RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the late evening of 14 July 2021 KB was driving his car on [Street name] in [Suburb] when he was involved in a collision with a van dr...

3. Wang v Denekamp [2018] NZIACDT 48 (23 November 2018) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...Denekamp,1 dated 31 August 2018. The Tribunal found in that decision that Mr Denekamp had breached professional obligations. [2] The facts relating to the complaint, as found by the Tribunal, are in outline: [2.1] Mr Denekamp received a completed application form for a student visa. [2.2] He had no personal contact with the complainant, accordingly: [2.2.1] He never interviewed the complainant to understand his immigration options. [2.2.2] He did not enter into a written agre...

4. LA v VY LCRO 217 / 2010 (30 April 2012) [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...the Applicant, including money anticipated to be received from WINZ, and the Applicant receiving all of the files of the deceased and other documents. [15] The last part states (at number four), “this is a full and final settlement of all claims”, required the Applicant to make no more complaints of any kind to any authority concerning the Practitioner, that there was to be no litigation against the Practitioner, and that production of this settlement document was to be a co...

5. Preece v Hokotehi Moriori Trust (2010) 5 Te Waipounamu MB 83 (5 TWP 83) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...MORIORI TRUST MLC A20090019083 12 October 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT 5 TE WAIPOUNAMU MB 83 (5 TWP 83) A20090019083 UNDER Section 18(1)(e), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application to determine whether a specified person is a Māori or descendant of a Māori BETWEEN CHARLES PREECE Applicant AND HOKOTEHI MORIORI TRUST Respondent Hearing: 15 February 2010, 1 Te Waipounamu MB 213-227 (Heard at C...

6. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 169 APPLICANT OT APPLICANT US RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) R Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by OT and US against N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. OT drove a [vehicle] into the parking area which is part of N Ltd’s business. OT and US now brin...

7. NI v CT [2020] NZDT 1382 (14 May 2020) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1382 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT CT SECOND RESPONDENT FM Limited RESPONDENT INSURER GNH Insurance The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. FM Limited is added as a respondent party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI was driving home from work on 29 July 2019 at about 7...

8. I Ltd v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 282 (7 November 2022) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court: Case number: [2022] NZDT 282 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. I Ltd (Mr & Mrs I) were interested in upgrading the tip truck that they use in their business. 2. They saw a [redacted] truck that N Ltd had advertised on [Website]. They contacted N Ltd about the truck, and...

9. Q Ltd v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 437 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 437 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,737.55 to Q Ltd on or before Thursday 6 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 4 March 2021, QM (now called Q Ltd, the tenant) and D Ltd (the landlord) signed an agreement to lease premises at [address], for a term of two years from 1 May 2021. The tenant...

10. QU v GD Ltd [2024] NZDT 104 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 104 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT GD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 19 June 2022, QU purchased flights to and accommodation in [Country] and [City 1] from GD Ltd and ‘DN travel insurance’, with his plans to then continue his own private arrangements in South East Asia. Within a week of arriving...