12940 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1382 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT CT SECOND RESPONDENT FM Limited RESPONDENT INSURER GNH Insurance The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. FM Limited is added as a respondent party to the claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI was driving home from work on 29 July 2019 at about 7...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court: Case number: [2022] NZDT 282 APPLICANT I Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. I Ltd (Mr & Mrs I) were interested in upgrading the tip truck that they use in their business. 2. They saw a [redacted] truck that N Ltd had advertised on [Website]. They contacted N Ltd about the truck, and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 437 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,737.55 to Q Ltd on or before Thursday 6 June 2024. Reasons: 1. On 4 March 2021, QM (now called Q Ltd, the tenant) and D Ltd (the landlord) signed an agreement to lease premises at [address], for a term of two years from 1 May 2021. The tenant...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 104 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT GD Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 19 June 2022, QU purchased flights to and accommodation in [Country] and [City 1] from GD Ltd and ‘DN travel insurance’, with his plans to then continue his own private arrangements in South East Asia. Within a week of arriving...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 340 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TN bought a new phone from T Ltd through their website. The purchase price of the new phone included a trade in value for TN’s old T Ltd phone. The estimated trade in amount was $220.00. When TN sent his old ph...
...Ltd for it. That is essentially ZI’s claim – his company has issued a quotation to install an ORG as per the building consent plans which involves, at this point, other associated work – the quotation is for $10,000.00 plus GST but as he has claimed $10,000.00, the amount able to be considered is limited to $10.000.00. 4. There is more to this dispute. ZI says that when he contacted the real estate agent, the agent gave him the number of the drainlayer who had completed the dr...
...MORIORI TRUST MLC A20090019083 12 October 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT 5 TE WAIPOUNAMU MB 83 (5 TWP 83) A20090019083 UNDER Section 18(1)(e), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application to determine whether a specified person is a Māori or descendant of a Māori BETWEEN CHARLES PREECE Applicant AND HOKOTEHI MORIORI TRUST Respondent Hearing: 15 February 2010, 1 Te Waipounamu MB 213-227 (Heard at C...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 158 APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT MB Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. Brief Details of Claim 1. On 13 July 2022 LI delivered an oil painting by FDX to XT of MB Ltd for auction on 17 July 2022. The item was photographed and included in MB Ltd’s online catalogue, describing the painting as “Very early FDX Ori...
...Ansell, counsel for defendant Judgment: 19 August 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] These proceedings involve a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority dated 8 March 2019.1 [2] A statement of claim and statement of defence have been filed. Mr Finnigan, counsel for the defendant, filed a memorandum of counsel accompanying the statement of defence. He complained that the statement of claim did not fully and clearly set out the g...
...the Applicant, including money anticipated to be received from WINZ, and the Applicant receiving all of the files of the deceased and other documents. [15] The last part states (at number four), “this is a full and final settlement of all claims”, required the Applicant to make no more complaints of any kind to any authority concerning the Practitioner, that there was to be no litigation against the Practitioner, and that production of this settlement document was to be a co...