12666 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1365 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT BT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) BN Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KN and BT own neighbouring properties with an L-shaped shared boundary and a 26m length runs along BT’s driveway (which runs to the house at the rear of K...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 610 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT KE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 24 August 2023 SE and KE sold a [campervan] to LL for $12,000.00. LL later found various problems with the van and claims $8,157.00 from SE and KE made up as follows: a. Panel beating $ 4,128.00 b. Leaks (engine oil and coolant) $...
...defend the proceedings brought against them in the District Court by BE. 6. As Claim 503 and Claim 19 relate to the same facts, they were heard together before me in person at the [City] Court on 1 July 2024. CN and MN attended the hearing as the Applicants. KN attended the hearing as the Respondent of Claim 503. HW attended the hearing on behalf of W Ltd, the Respondent of Claim 19, and was appointed as W Ltd’s representative. 7. This order sets out my findings in relation to bo...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 581 BETWEEN AN APPLICANT AND ZM Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 January 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that that the respondent, ZM Ltd, pay the amount of $250.00 to the applicant, AN, on or before 31 January 2012. Facts [1] The applicant states that on 15 November 2011 she parked her car in Z Town. She left the site for a small err...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1476 APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT QJ Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: QJ Limited is to pay the sum of $210.00 to TO on or before Thursday 24 May 2018. Reasons: 1. In June 2017, TO purchased a battery for his electric golf trundler from QJ Limited, trading as Mr Q. He wanted a “deep cycle” battery, which h...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 187 APPLICANT DD and UD FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT AX N Ltd THIRD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $14,500.00 to DD and UD on or before 23 April 2024; and Ownership of the vehicle, VIN number [redacted], re-vests in N Ltd as of today’s date, and DD and UD are to return the vehicle to N Ltd wit...
...between T LTD and AB arising out of that separate agreement which Mr FT was not part of. c. It does remove T LTD’s primary liability to Mr FT to pay for the shipping costs of the FT container after receiving full payment for those shipping cost form Mr FT. 12. I find in breach of the contract between T LTD and Mr FT, T LTD has not paid U Ltd’s cost of shipping Mr FT’s container to [Country 1]. T LTD is therefore liable to pay the reasonable proven losses that arise out of that...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: • The application for review and attached information. • The letter dated...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 684 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT KL The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. D Ltd is to pay KL the total sum of $1500.00 on or before Tuesday 30 January 2024. Reasons: 1. KL’s car had been vandalised and in lieu of write off he had settled with his insurer and was restoring it. In April 2022 he engaged D Ltd (th...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 186 APPLICANT BC FIRST RESPONDENT ME SECOND RESPONDENT PI APPLICANT’S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: PI is to pay $7036.00 to X Ltd (being all insured losses) on or before 11 April 2024; and PI’s claim against ME is dismissed. Reasons 1. Three drivers were involved in two motor vehicle collisions outside [Location A] in March 2022....