Search Results

1. UH v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 306 (21 July 2023) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...head applies a slight pressure. The watch has to be placed face down, and, as the back of the watch is slightly curved, it has placed pressure on the 100 year old mineral glass and caused the crystal to shatter. NK, however, said his service was performed on the basis of ‘all care and no responsibility’. 7. I find that once N Ltd accepted the engraving on the antique watches, then it was bound to perform its service using reasonable care and skill and so that the result would be...

2. BK v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1707 (15 December 2021) [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...established any ground to be allowed credits for the flights that he did not take, or those that he might take in the future. His claim must therefore be dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 15 December 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. IN v EW [2025] NZDT 3 (10 April 2025) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...she has not collected the fabric and dress pieces by 6 pm on 10 May 2025, EW can dispose of them in any manner he sees fit. K O'Shea Disputes Tribunal Referee 10 April 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. EM v EI Ltd [2024] NZDT 366 (26 June 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...various reasons, EM was unable to complete the course. He claims a refund from EI Ltd of the price that he paid. [2] The documents provided showed that EM signed a document described as “Disclosure to all Recreational Students and Booking Information” on 20 November 2022. On the same date, he completed and signed a questionnaire relating to his medical fitness. He paid $499.00 for the course fee, and was scheduled to do the course at [lake] on the weekend of 17 – 18 December 2022...

5. DF v QT [2024] NZDT 474 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...instructed her to obtain a quote to replace the fence. DF obtained a quote from Mr U, a local builder / handyman. The quote was for $7,570.00 to replace the boundary fence between [address 1] and [address 2]. 4. Both parties submitted this information to their insurers. The claims were accepted, and they received payment of $3,785.00 each. 5. Mr U then refused to proceed with the job. In DF’s view, he did so because he realised that he had under-quoted the job. DF suspects t...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 168 Mawhinney v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Decision. [4] SUB-2008-570 was an application to the Waitakere City Council (to which the Auckland Council is successor) in 2008 for a 15 lot subdivision and SUB-2008-571 for a 75 lot subdivision. The applications for declarations 4 and 6 relate to the former, application 44 relates (indirectly) to the latter. Declaration 4 [5] 2 The declaration sought is: Four applications were set down for hearing but one (for declaration 45) was withdrawn prior to the hearing. Described i...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairoa [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...\ I I I I r ··' •• · ! J ( I ( ) j I FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form. it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...

8. TS v CT Ltd [2019] NZDT 1377 (25 July 2019) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...a result of condensation. 17. All disconnection and removal costs are addressed via the order to have CTL undertake all that work at its own cost. Referee: J Perfect Date: 25 July 2019 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply...

9. OO v QP [2023] NZDT 70 (20 February 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...what his intended purpose for the house would be. He told QD that he wanted to rent it out, either as long-term rental or for visitor accommodation, such as Air BnB. QD told him he should have no issues with Air BnB. 7. OO points out that the information pack provided by M Ltd contained a rental and market appraisal, which also suggested to him that it could be used for rental accommodation. The advertising brochure also referred to it as having four bedrooms and three bathrooms and re...

10. YI v CU Ltd [2023] NZDT 545 (25 October 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...invoices, and $500.00 compensation for time YI spent sorting out the issues with [water company], rescheduling of her flight [overseas] and overdraft interest. 7. The issues to be determined are: • Did CU breach the contract by failing to perform its contractual obligations to a reasonable standard? • If so, what reasonably foreseeable losses resulted from the breach? Did CU breach the contract by failing to perform its contractual obligations to a reasonable standard?...