Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 5 [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...oti katoa nga kaupapa i utaina ki runga ki a koe Waiho mai ra ko nga kaupapa i oti hei whakairo, hei whakamaumaharatanga kia koe E kore koe e wareware Turirangi Te Kani will be greatly missed when hearings resume in September for the Te Roroa claim. He will be missed by all of us: Tribunal, Tribunal staff, claimants and Crown. For those who had the honour of working with Turi, the gift of his knowledge and his warmth will remain. He was invaluable not only for his tribal hist...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 118 Pyne Gould Corp Ltd v West [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...dated 18 March, 2 and 9 April and 19 May 2014) Counsel: M Crotty and A Service, counsel for the plaintiff L Ryder, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 July 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL The application [1] This judgment relates to a contested disclosure issue. [2] The defendant, Mr James West, was appointed by the plaintiff, Pyne Gould Corporation Limited (PGC), as Financial Controller in June 2011, having worked for PG...

3. LCRO 216/2018 AA v BB (28 November 2019) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...advice on matters relating to cost issues. [8] Ms BB provided her opinion on 31 July 2017. [9] On 1 August 2017, Mr CC advised Ms BB, that Mr AA did not wish to proceed with an appeal. He did however indicate that he wished to proceed with a claim in negligence, and to make an application for stay. [10] On 25 October 2017, Mr CC forwarded to Ms BB a letter of demand from [JDY]’s lawyer. That letter of demand advised, that a charging order had been obtained over Mr AA’s prop...

4. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 150 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 150 ACAR 130/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AMY VAN WEY LOVATT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Applicant is self-represented H Evans for the Respondent Judgment: 24 September 2024 ______________________________________...

5. UI & II v SG [2024] NZDT 224 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 224 APPLICANT UI and II RESPONDENT SG SECOND RESPONDENT W Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SG owns [property 1] and [property 2]. The long ROW driveway leading to his properties runs parallel to the ROW driveway for [property 3], w

6. KC v KZ [2024] NZDT 421 (30 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

7. EI v EE Ltd [2024] NZDT 529 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 529 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT EE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late January 2024 EI and her husband stayed one night at [a hotel] in [City], which is operated by EE Ltd Limited (“EE Ltd”). Early on 29 January 2024 EI and her husband ate breakfast together at the hotel, each ordering a vegetarian...

8. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

9. BD v DS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1504 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 134 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1504 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT LE SECOND RESPONDENT DS Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BD says the DS Limited (DS) knowingly and deliberately supplied under specification concrete and this rendered his purpose built building unsuitable for the purpose for which it was bui...

10. T Ltd v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 100 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 100 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay to T Ltd the sum of $7,429.00 on or before 21 April 2023. Reasons: 1. In or around September 2022, T Ltd carried out work for R Ltd. 2. T Ltd sent an invoice to R Ltd in October 2022 for $7,429.00. 3. A number of reminders were sent from T Lt...