Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 121 Thunderbird One Ltd v Harrington [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...plaintiff”. However, other than in the intituling, the statement makes no reference to the “first plaintiff” and seeks no relief on behalf of that company. The application for extension of time was made solely by Thunderbird One Limited. The form of these documents reflects the Authority’s conclusion in its first determination that the applicant was the respondent’s employer. That determination was not challenged. On the material currently before the Court, there is n...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 154 TUV v WXY [pdf, 512 KB]

   ...must fail. The sequence of events [7] The plaintiff had been employed as a clerk by the defendant for many years. Issues arose which led to an employment dispute. The plaintiff believed that she was being subjected to an unjustified performance management process. She sought medical attention and received a string of medical certificates advising that she was assessed as unfit for work. A certificate issued on 17 April 2015 referred to the plaintiff suffering from: …...

3. Fines application forms

   Statement of means form You can use this form to help you communicate your financial means to the court when you ask for time to pay your fines. Statement of means form Application to dispute that a fine has been filed in court Also called a 78B application, you can use it to have an infringement fine returned to the issuing authority where you can challenge it. Learn more about disputing a fine Application to dispute that a fine has been filed in court Claim to seized property If your property

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About fines

4. LCRO 138/2015 AZ, VY and CX v DW and EV [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...the respondents, alleging breach of directors’ duties and applying to set aside transactions which the liquidators considered were voidable. [9] The respondents asked the liquidators to pursue an action in negligence against the company’s former solicitor. A successful outcome would have provided funds to pay the company’s debts, but the liquidators were unwilling to pursue the claim. [10] The respondents initially personally defended the proceedings against them, but aft...

5. Holmes [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The submission dated 31 December 2009 from Mr and Mrs Holmes to the chief executive. The assessor’s report dated 20 November 2009. The letter from John Bansgrove of the Department of Building and Housing to t...

6. De Marco v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on Appeal) [2025] NZACC 27 (17 February 2025) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...the conduct of the proceeding; and (c) necessary for the conduct of the proceeding; and (d) reasonable in amount. Discussion [11] In her second application, notwithstanding Ms De Marco expresses her claim for costs as disbursements, the sum claimed appears to be in the nature of a claim for damages involving in part a claim for pain, stress and suffering in consequence of the way she feels she has been treated by the Corporation. [12] A claim for costs on appeal by a successfu...

7. [2008] NZEmpC CC 9/08 Coffey v The Christchurch Press, a division of Fairfax NZ Ltd [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...Coffey, O’Connell (Mr Coffey’s representative), and Thompson and Ms Webby. The notes recorded Mr Thompson saying that Mr Coffey had to show Mr Lammers respect. [12] Following that meeting Mr Thompson wrote to Mr Coffey on 13 December 2006 requesting his attendance at a disciplinary meeting to discuss a number of concerns about Mr Coffey’s alleged poor performance, attitude and behaviour over the past 2 months. It cited a particular incident on 1 November 2006 in which, du...

8. Director of Proceedings v Smith (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...made clear to counsel during those attempts that a key issue for the Director was public accountability through a declaration in the Tribunal naming the defendant. The current Director was not a party to those early discussions and despite ongoing requests for a settlement, she elected to pursue a public remedy. Ultimately, the fact that the defendant consented to a declaration of breach of the Code and the fact that costs were also settled, underlines the sincerity of the defendant’s...

9. BB & TL v A Ltd [2023] NZDT 667 (24 November 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...were noticed by the Applicants, whose lawyer notified A Ltd of the list of items that required remedying prior to settlement of the sale. The settlement went ahead before the defects were remedied and following settlement, the Applicants again requested that the defects be remedied. When the A Ltd did not address the request, the Applicants brought their claim to the Tribunal. 3. Following two hearings which were adjourned to allow the remedial work to be carried out, A Ltd remed...

10. Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (Costs) [2024] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 173 KB]

    ...REPRESENTATION Mr RD Cunliffe and Ms RV Cunliffe in person Mr M Hutcheson and Ms L Wilkinson for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 28 – 29 August 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 31 May 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 [1] Mr and Ms Cunliffe claimed that the Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (the Board) interfered with their privacy by refusing information privacy requests that they 1 This decision is to be cited as Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School...