11488 items matching your search terms
Templates V8 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 27b Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of clai...
...for inspection. They did not communicate with or consult with DQ over its disposal or tell him prior that they may potentially dispose of it after the inspection. 18. Further I do not accept that Z Ltd’s collection of the item for inspection formed part of the original contract of carriage. That carriage was at an end once the toilet was delivered to DQ. Therefore Z Ltd’s terms and conditions did not apply beyond that time. 19. The tort of conversion occurs when one party inte...
...Practice Standards For Legal Aid Providers Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclud...
...Practice Standards For Legal Aid Providers Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclud...
...Coffey, O’Connell (Mr Coffey’s representative), and Thompson and Ms Webby. The notes recorded Mr Thompson saying that Mr Coffey had to show Mr Lammers respect. [12] Following that meeting Mr Thompson wrote to Mr Coffey on 13 December 2006 requesting his attendance at a disciplinary meeting to discuss a number of concerns about Mr Coffey’s alleged poor performance, attitude and behaviour over the past 2 months. It cited a particular incident on 1 November 2006 in which, du...
...made clear to counsel during those attempts that a key issue for the Director was public accountability through a declaration in the Tribunal naming the defendant. The current Director was not a party to those early discussions and despite ongoing requests for a settlement, she elected to pursue a public remedy. Ultimately, the fact that the defendant consented to a declaration of breach of the Code and the fact that costs were also settled, underlines the sincerity of the defendant’s...
...REPRESENTATION Mr RD Cunliffe and Ms RV Cunliffe in person Mr M Hutcheson and Ms L Wilkinson for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 28 – 29 August 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 31 May 2024 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 [1] Mr and Ms Cunliffe claimed that the Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (the Board) interfered with their privacy by refusing information privacy requests that they 1 This decision is to be cited as Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School...
...must fail. The sequence of events [7] The plaintiff had been employed as a clerk by the defendant for many years. Issues arose which led to an employment dispute. The plaintiff believed that she was being subjected to an unjustified performance management process. She sought medical attention and received a string of medical certificates advising that she was assessed as unfit for work. A certificate issued on 17 April 2015 referred to the plaintiff suffering from: …...
...appellant’s left foot/ankle. Background [2] On 27 September 2016 the appellant injured her left foot/ankle when she knocked it on wood at her home in Christchurch. [3] On 15 November 2016 the appellant visited her GP, Dr Averis, and an ACC injury claim form was completed and lodged. The claim was for a foot/ankle sprain. Cover was granted for the injury on 22 November 2016. [4] On 8 September 2017 Dr Averis referred the appellant to orthopaedic surgeon, Mr Maxwell...
...plaintiff”. However, other than in the intituling, the statement makes no reference to the “first plaintiff” and seeks no relief on behalf of that company. The application for extension of time was made solely by Thunderbird One Limited. The form of these documents reflects the Authority’s conclusion in its first determination that the applicant was the respondent’s employer. That determination was not challenged. On the material currently before the Court, there is n...