10909 items matching your search terms
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 35 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Relationship Property Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 38 Tax Invoice ACC Legal Aid Fixed Fees Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Forum Category 1 2...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 41 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Protection of Personal & Property Rights (PPPR) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Inter...
Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 44 Tax Invoice Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fees Employment (Employment Relations Authority) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice...
...produced invoices from [panelbeaters] for a total of $3,114.49. I accept this figure as being fair and reasonable. There will be an order for this sum. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 14 February 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000012 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 18 BETWEEN WAJIRA KUMARA DASSANAYAKE AND KUMUDIKA PRIYANTHI DASSANAYAKE Claimants AND MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND D MOORE Second Respondent AND PETER YAU Third Respondent AND STEVE O’LEARY Fourth Respondent Decision: 24 June 2010 COSTS DETERMINATION Adjudicator: K D Kilgour Application by First Respondent for Costs following Determination o
...against him personally. The Council, however, took a different view and sought to have Mr Brentnall remain in the proceeding and that matter was duly dealt with. For Mr Brentnall it is now argued that it was only because of the Council's request that Mr Brentnall remain personally as a respondent that that occurred at the time and that, but for that intervention by the Council, Mr Brentnall would have been struck out as a respondent. That does not necessarily follow. The...
...[6] The specified date agreed between the parties is 23 December 2019 (specified date). Following the specified date construction of the roundabout proceeded so that by 2022 it was complete. Approximately 150 m of Whatukooruru Drive has been formed as a stub road which provides access to the remaining 17 ha of the claimant’s land (the remaining land or balance land). The claimant is in the process of developing the balance land as a residential subdivision. [7] HCC says that...
...she became aware Mr Craig had held a media conference at Auckland at which he released a booklet called “Dirty Politics and Hidden Agendas”. The booklet mentions Ms MacGregor, claims to quote her and refers to a relationship she had, which is information Mr Craig could only have known through the mediation process. Mr Craig has sent a copy of this booklet to households throughout New Zealand. [11] Ms MacGregor says that each time Mr Craig makes a public comment about her or the se...
...education. [20] The plaintiff says that on 30 August 2010 he sent an email to the Principal stating his belief that the defendant had acted unfairly and unlawfully in the course of its investigation of the complaints against him on 4 August 2010, and he requested that the Principal apologise to him. The plaintiff says that on 16 September 2010, the Principal, Mrs Pamaka, wrote to the Chairperson of the Board setting out her complaints against the plaintiff under the heading “Matt...