Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC AC 14/07 Talakai v Amcor Flexibles Ltd [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...TALAKAI V AMCOR FLEXIBLES LTD AK AC 14/07 26 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 14/07 ARC 117/05 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN SIALE TALAKAI Plaintiff AND AMCOR FLEXIBLES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 14 February and 20 March 2007 Judgment: 26 March 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDG...

2. McCreath v Attorney-General (Interim Non-Publication Order) [2014] NZHRRT 59 [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...B Background [1] When these proceedings were filed on 19 July 2013 Mr McCreath was then a prisoner detained at Christchurch Men’s Prison. He alleges that while so detained he was the subject of gender discrimination and his statement of claim cites the Minister of Corrections as first defendant and the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections 2 as second defendant. The two nurses responsible, in part, for his treatment (Nurse A and Nurse B) are cited as third an...

3. [2022] NZIACDT 19 – TA v Tian (Sanctions) (25 July 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: L Lim, counsel Complainant: R Sathiyanathan, K L Chiu, counsel Adviser: Self-represented 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Ms Ying Tian (aka Tina Qin), the adviser, acted for TA, the complainant, on numerous unsuccessful applications. She did not tell him of the outcome of the applications and largely had no instructions from him to make them. For a prolonged period, she pretended to be acting for him but was not actually undertaking any work on his be...

4. HN v FH Ltd [2021] NZDT 1576 (16 July 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1576 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT FH Limited The Tribunal orders: That the Application is dismissed. Reasons: 1.On the 3rd of January 2021, HN booked 3 tickets at @$175 each for a total $525 with FH Ltd (FH) to be an ”On the Water Spectator America’s Cup Match” for Saturday the 13th of March 2021 departing @...

5. P Ltd v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1643 (8 October 2021) [pdf, 145 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1643 APPLICANT P Limited RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. Q Ltd is to pay P Ltd a total of $3500.00 on or before Friday 29 October 2021. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2019, P Ltd contracted with Q Ltd to supply and fit 4 new tyres, rims and a 2 inch suspension lift kit...

6. XD v KA [2023] NZDT 348 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 348 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT KA The Tribunal orders: KA is to pay XD $1,500.00 on or before 21 July 2023. Reasons: 1. XD bought a fish from someone advertising on [online website]. He now wishes to return the fish and obtain a refund. 2. The first hearing of this claim was set down to be heard by teleconference...

7. HG v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 650 (27 November 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 650 APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT N Ltd Order of the Tribunal 1. N Ltd is to pay $14,428.50 to HG by 20 December 2023. 2. The amount ordered includes the deduction of $2,080.00 the applicant owes for N Ltd delivery charges and $300.00 for storage of a TV and Chair. Reasons 1. The issues to be determined in this case are:...

8. [2009] NZEmpC AC 10/09 Webb v New Zealand Tramways and Public Passengers Transport Union Inc [pdf, 21 KB]

   ...TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INC AK AC 10/09 26 March 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 10/09 ARC 85/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out part of statement of claim BETWEEN BRIAN ALEXANDER WEBB Plaintiff AND NEW ZEALAND TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC PASSENGERS TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES' UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 25 March 2009 (Heard at Au...

9. AP v Standards Committee X LCRO 317 / 2012 (15 August 2013) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...of misconduct, a finding that only the Tribunal could make, and also noting that the Applicant had failed to respond or comply with a requirement pursuant to s 147(2)(a) to produce for the Committee’s inspection certain documents that had been requested. Review application [11] The grounds cited by the Applicant for review were bias, procedural unfairness, error in fact and law, wrong in determining the matter reached the necessary threshold of the New Zealand Law Society Discip...

10. [2025] NZEmpC 80  AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...the long service leave issue but were unable to agree on the retirement benefits issue and filed submissions. Accordingly, the Court must now resolve that issue. [4] The first topic addressed by the parties’ submissions was the fact that no claim for retiring leave was specifically pleaded as part of AJY’s claim. Ms Coats, counsel for Corrections, submitted that when the judgment refers to retirement benefits arising from nine months’ additional service, it refers only to em...