Search Results

1. LCRO 216/2018 AA v BB (28 November 2019) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...advice on matters relating to cost issues. [8] Ms BB provided her opinion on 31 July 2017. [9] On 1 August 2017, Mr CC advised Ms BB, that Mr AA did not wish to proceed with an appeal. He did however indicate that he wished to proceed with a claim in negligence, and to make an application for stay. [10] On 25 October 2017, Mr CC forwarded to Ms BB a letter of demand from [JDY]’s lawyer. That letter of demand advised, that a charging order had been obtained over Mr AA’s prop...

2. NT v ND & Ors [2023] NZDT 751 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

3. BD v DS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1504 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 134 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1504 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT LE SECOND RESPONDENT DS Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BD says the DS Limited (DS) knowingly and deliberately supplied under specification concrete and this rendered his purpose built building unsuitable for the purpose for which it was bui...

4. T Ltd v R Ltd [2023] NZDT 100 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 100 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay to T Ltd the sum of $7,429.00 on or before 21 April 2023. Reasons: 1. In or around September 2022, T Ltd carried out work for R Ltd. 2. T Ltd sent an invoice to R Ltd in October 2022 for $7,429.00. 3. A number of reminders were sent from T Lt...

5. KN v BT [2020] NZDT 1365 (9 December 2020) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1365 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT BT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) BN Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KN and BT own neighbouring properties with an L-shaped shared boundary and a 26m length runs along BT’s driveway (which runs to the house at the rear of K...

6. LL v KE [2024] NZDT 610 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 135 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 610 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT KE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 24 August 2023 SE and KE sold a [campervan] to LL for $12,000.00. LL later found various problems with the van and claims $8,157.00 from SE and KE made up as follows: a. Panel beating $ 4,128.00 b. Leaks (engine oil and coolant) $...

7. CN & MN v KN & W Ltd [2024] NZDT 521 (7 August 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...defend the proceedings brought against them in the District Court by BE. 6. As Claim 503 and Claim 19 relate to the same facts, they were heard together before me in person at the [City] Court on 1 July 2024. CN and MN attended the hearing as the Applicants. KN attended the hearing as the Respondent of Claim 503. HW attended the hearing on behalf of W Ltd, the Respondent of Claim 19, and was appointed as W Ltd’s representative. 7. This order sets out my findings in relation to bo...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 10 - BC v Lawlor (18 May 2022) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...application would be returned. Another attempt at payment was made by the officer on 25 September, but it was unsuccessful. [22] On 26 September 2019, Immigration NZ sent a letter to the brother-in-law (through Mr Lawlor) advising that the family’s applications received on 10 September 2019 were not accepted as they were incomplete. The fees had not been paid. [23] In a text sent to Mr Lawlor by the complainant that day, she asked him to explain why they had applied for that...

9. DD & UD v AX & Ors [2024] NZDT 187 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 187 APPLICANT DD and UD FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT AX N Ltd THIRD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $14,500.00 to DD and UD on or before 23 April 2024; and Ownership of the vehicle, VIN number [redacted], re-vests in N Ltd as of today’s date, and DD and UD are to return the vehicle to N Ltd wit...

10. FT v MU & T Ltd & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 470 [pdf, 227 KB]

    ...between T LTD and AB arising out of that separate agreement which Mr FT was not part of. c. It does remove T LTD’s primary liability to Mr FT to pay for the shipping costs of the FT container after receiving full payment for those shipping cost form Mr FT. 12. I find in breach of the contract between T LTD and Mr FT, T LTD has not paid U Ltd’s cost of shipping Mr FT’s container to [Country 1]. T LTD is therefore liable to pay the reasonable proven losses that arise out of that...