12939 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 117 APPLICANT TQ RESPONDENT IU The Tribunal orders: IU is to pay TQ $983.49 by 20 March 2023. Reasons 1. TQ’s claim seeks the return of a [redacted] vehicle. 2. TQ submitted that she purchased the vehicle from IU, but he has refused to give it to her. 3. The hearing took place by phone on 1 March 2023. T...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 576 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT DI SECOND RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: 1. The Respondents, DI and SI are ordered to pay the Applicant U Ltd a sum of $900.45 on or before 5pm on 8 December 2023. Reasons: 2. This matter was set down for a teleconference before me at 11.30am on 20 November 2023. I was unab...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 611 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT LG Ltd The Tribunal orders: LG Ltd is to pay BN $1,499.00 on or before 1 October 2024. Reasons 1. BN ordered a custom-made couch from LG Ltd and paid $1,499.00. It was a term of the contract that it would be delivered to BN’s home. However, LG Ltd did not successfully deliver the couch, despite sever...
...Claimant AND ARGON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND BERNARD MOHAN Third Respondent AND PAUL BAYER (Removed) Fourth Respondent DECISION ON STRIKE OUT APPLICATIONS Dated 8 October 2008 BACKGROUND The strike out applications [1] This decision follows a hearing on 2 September 2008 to determine strike out and removal applications by the first respondent Argon Construction...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 642 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay DC $500.00 by 29 November 2023. Background 1. In February 2020 DC purchased a T Ltd [e-bike] from [bicycle shop] in [town 1]. The price was $8,403.00. 2. In April 2023 the battery for the ebike failed when DC was travelling in the South Island. 3. DC...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 254 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT KB The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late 2019 H Ltd carried out bathroom renovations for KB. H Ltd invoiced her a total of $13,769.40. She has paid $12,000.00. H Ltd claims the balance of $1,769.40. 2. Both parties attended the hearing. H Ltd was represent...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 185 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT TU, DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. H Ltd (Unit D) and TU, and DU and GU as trustees for the U Family Trust (Unit C) own adjoining units at [Address]. During storms on 8 January 2023 and the Auckland Anniversary weekend storm of
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 652 APPLICANT UE RESPONDENT TF SECOND RESPONDENT KD The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UE purchased a boat from TF in February 2024. After the purchase, the boat developed problems and UE had it assessed by a mechanic, SR in [City 1]. She was advised that the engine was not economical to re...
...details .............................................................................................................. 11 Your legal aid office .................................................................................................... 11 Applications ................................................................................................................... 14 Eligibility ........................................................................................................
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KQ APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT SG APPLICANTS’ INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: SG is to pay KQ and LT $4,405.65 on or before Friday 7 July 2023. Reasons: 1. KQ and LT own a home in [City]. SG previously occupied the adjoining property. KQ and LT say that in October 2021 SG damaged the brick b...