Search Results

1. 14 April 2025 Masters v Hastings District Council [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...vacate the hearing. If settlement is reached prior to the hearing, please notify the Tribunal immediately. 1. SCHEDULING AND HEARING FEES The scheduling fee is incurred when the proceeding is scheduled for a substantive hearing or any other application or proceeding (apart from an interlocutory application). The scheduling fee is not refundable if the hearing is no longer required. The scheduling fee for setting a matter down before the Land Valuation Tribunal is $1,170.00. The...

2. AG Ltd v ZT Ltd [2014] NZDT 607 (6 May 2014) [pdf, 23 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2014] NZDT 607 BETWEEN AG Ltd APPLICANT AND ZT Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 6 May 2014 Referee: Referee Costigan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZT Ltd (the respondent) is to pay AG Ltd (the applicant) $1,144.25 on or before 20 May 2014. Facts [1] AG Ltd (the applicant) agreed to hire a stand to ZT Ltd (the respondent) at the [industry event] in 2013 for $2,288.50. It...

3. LU v VK LCRO 209 / 2011 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...title to land). No undertaking was given by the Practitioner’s firm and in 1993 the firm released the sum of $6,000 to its client. A Disputes Tribunal later concluded that the Practitioner’s client was in breach of the contract for having requested payment of this money to him. 2 [5] The adjudicator noted that the Applicant sought repayment of this sum by the Practitioner’s client back to the Practitioner’s firm for holding. However, the adjudicator explained...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 203 Courage v Attorney-General [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 203 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for discovery against non-party BETWEEN HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL sued on behalf of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Labour Inspec...

5. DQ v IC [2023] NZDT 710 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 710 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2022 DQ purchased an eight-week old purebred [puppy] from IC for $5,000.00. DQ and IC agreed on terms which are contained in the TC Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”), a copy of which IC provided in evidence. 2. The puppy is...

6. Sen v Kiff [2012] NZWHT Auckland 3 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...CONTENTS BACKGROUND ............................................................................................. 4 Matters the Tribunal must decide ................................................................ 4 Mr and Mrs Sen’s application to join Mr Redpath ........................................ 5 The amount claimed ................................................................................... 5 ARE THERE DEFECTS CAUSING LEAKS AND DAMAGE OR LIKELY FUTURE DAMA...

7. [2021] NZACC 128 - CM v ACC (04 August 2021) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: The appellant in person Mr C Light for the respondent Judgment: 4 August 2021 ____________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J McGUIRE [Section 360(1) – Claim for cover under former Acts filed after 1 April 2002 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue on this appeal is a decision dated 26 July 2019 from the...

8. Naidu v Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...2018 the Tribunal made two orders in favour of Dr Naidu: [1.1] A declaration that there had been an interference with the privacy of Dr Naidu by the refusal by the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) to provide access to personal information requested by Dr Naidu under IPP 6. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Naidu v Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (Costs) [2018] NZHRRT 33] 2 [1.2] A compliance order requiring RA...

9. KD & JBH Ltd v GU Ltd [2022] NZDT 71 (12 January 2022) [pdf, 144 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 71 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT GU Limited C/- G APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) JBH Limited The Tribunal orders: GU Ltd is to pay JBH Ltd $4,928.60 within 28 days. The first $400.00 of this sum received by JBH Ltd is to be paid by JBH Ltd to KD within 7 days of its receipt by JBH Ltd. Reasons...

10. ZY v BT [2023] NZDT 784 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 784 APPLICANT ZY RESPONDENT BT APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: BT to pay J Ltd $9,003.96 by 15 January 2024. Reasons. 1. On the12 January 2023 ZY’s vehicle [registration number] was traveling along [a road] in [city]. ZY stopped when traffic in front of him stopped because of a red...