Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12555 items matching your search terms

  1. VH Ltd v KI [2024] NZDT 386 (24 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 386 APPLICANT VH Ltd RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: 1. KI is not liable to pay the sum of $13801.15 to VH Ltd. 2. VH Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business comprise (BEC) fraud. In September-October 2023 VH Ltd carried out lands...

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 133 Ngawaka v Global Security Solutions Ltd [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 133 EMPC 343/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN RIO NGAWAKA Plaintiff AND GLOBAL SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: R Ngawaka, plaintiff in person R Johnson, agent...

  3. ABZ and ACA Ltd v ZYE and ZYD Ltd [2013] NZDT 93 (25 March 2013) [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...5 April 2013. Facts [1] On 30 May 2012, ABZ’s daughter had parked ABZ’s car outside a friend’s house in front of the garage. While it was parked, it was impacted by ZYE while she was reversing. [2] ABZ and her insurer, ACA Ltd, claim $1,307.26 being the assessed cost of repairs. [3] ZYE accepts liability for the impact and ZYD Ltd (the Respondent’s insurer) accepts the assessment as fair for the damage incurred in the 30 May incident. However, ZYD Ltd disputes...

  4. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...2009 letter. The letter also reiterated the need for a new application and, in addition, noted there were outstanding court proceedings so there was a character issue to address. This letter required a response by 27 August 2009. The Adviser has not claimed the court proceedings were a bar to a successful application for a work permit, or that this element had any impact on his advice. [37] The Adviser failed to respond to the two letters from Immigration New Zealand and, accordingly, th...

  5. Herewini - Maungaroa No.1 Section 23K (Keterau) (2013) 85 Waiariki MB 141 (85 WAR 141) [pdf, 76 KB]

    ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20130003077 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Maungaroa No. 1 Section 23K (Keterau) BETWEEN Wetini and Pauline Herewini Applicants Hearing: 3 July 2013, 81 Waiariki MB 235-256 (Heard at Te Kaha) Appearances: I Peterson & K Johnson, counsel for the applicants Judgment: 30 October 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF J...

  6. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 150 (24 September 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 150 ACAR 130/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AMY VAN WEY LOVATT Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: The Applicant is self-represented H Evans for the Respondent Judgment: 24 September 2024 ______________________________________...

  7. UI & II v SG [2024] NZDT 224 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 224 APPLICANT UI and II RESPONDENT SG SECOND RESPONDENT W Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SG owns [property 1] and [property 2]. The long ROW driveway leading to his properties runs parallel to the ROW driveway for [property 3], w

  8. KC v KZ [2024] NZDT 421 (30 April 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  9. EI v EE Ltd [2024] NZDT 529 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 529 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT EE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late January 2024 EI and her husband stayed one night at [a hotel] in [City], which is operated by EE Ltd Limited (“EE Ltd”). Early on 29 January 2024 EI and her husband ate breakfast together at the hotel, each ordering a vegetarian...

  10. [2014] NZEmpC 118 Pyne Gould Corp Ltd v West [pdf, 80 KB]

    ...dated 18 March, 2 and 9 April and 19 May 2014) Counsel: M Crotty and A Service, counsel for the plaintiff L Ryder, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 8 July 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL The application [1] This judgment relates to a contested disclosure issue. [2] The defendant, Mr James West, was appointed by the plaintiff, Pyne Gould Corporation Limited (PGC), as Financial Controller in June 2011, having worked for PG...