Search Results

1. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...Zealand Defence Staff (Washington). The move was an internal one and the position was not advertised, but a new employment agreement was signed. [16] Ms Radford worked as a Personal Assistant until she successfully requested a return to her former position. Her return was effective from 20 August 2012. Another employment agreement was signed to record the move back to working in the Finance/Administration role. [17] In what would begin the final stage of Ms Radford’s empl...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 71 Marx v Southern Cross Campus Board of Trustees [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...my professional duties is yet another attempt to bully and discredit me. As mentioned in my earlier email this morning I have every intention of defending myself as I consider your actions extremely prejudicial. [22] The email concluded with a request for “forms I need to make a formal complain[t] on how I have been treated”. [23] A further email followed on 8 February 2013 in which Mrs Marx stated that: We consider the current ‘suspension of my duties’ by the pri...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 36 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...freezing orders and ancillary orders against it. Mr Hwang and Ms Weon are shareholders in Saena. Freezing orders and ancillary orders are sought against them because they may control the business and/or have received any proceeds of sale. Request for urgency [7] The application was filed on 1 March 2022. Urgency was granted and the application was considered at a hearing with counsel, Mr Seungmin Kang, on 3 March 2022. 1 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [2021] NZERA 196 (Me...

4. Brooking v Henderson - Wharekahika A47 (2022) 110 Tairawhiti MB 238 (110 TRW 238) [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...Trustee and other elected trustees. The Māori Trustee’s administration over the trust ended in December 2018 and a separate group of trustees took over management of the trust. I was nominated and appointed as a trustee in February 2015 and formally appointed by the Māori Land Court in October of 2015. I was voted in as Chair in May 2016. Since my appointment as Chair, we have held numerous trustee hui and have held AGM’s in all years except 2017 as we were awaiting a report...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - District 11 Wairoa [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...\ I I I I r ··' •• · ! J ( I ( ) j I FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form. it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pub...

6. GJG ltd v SQS Ltd [2018] NZDT 1072 (26 April 2018) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...entitled to a refund? What was agreed between the parties? [5] The relevant law is the law of contract, the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA), and the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA). A contract need not be in writing; an agreement can be formed verbally or inferred from the parties’ conduct. [6] GJG argued that this was a case of buyer’s remorse, and that Mrs QS had been informed about the payments that would be taken under the twelve-month contract. Howev...

7. NC v MD [2021] NZDT 1348 (12 March 2021) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...saying he understood and agreed only to trimming on her property. She says “it could possibly have been a surprise to her” that the loquat tree was removed by her contractors. 7. I find, on the balance of probabilities and from the limited information available, that MD, at the least, gave inadequate instructions and supervision to her contractors and that this amounts to negligence. She is therefore liable in negligence for the reasonable costs of putting NC back into the posit...

8. CO Ltd v GM Ltd [2019] NZDT 1478 (26 July 2019) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...accordance with the Tribunal’s jurisdictional limit. Conclusion 11. For these reasons GM Ltd is to pay CO Ltd the sum of $15,000.00 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 26 July 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish...

9. UM v QO [2022] NZDT 252 (12 December 2022) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...dismissed. Reasons: 1. UM purchased a vehicle from DO via her son QO after seeing it advertised on U. 2. Prior to this, UM organised for it to be checked over by B and QO assisted with this taking place. 3. After the inspection, QO informed UM the price was reduced from $10,000 to $9,000 and that he would replace two tyres. 4. The agreement was made and included for the vehicle to be delivered to UM. 5. UM experienced issues with the engine and discovered rust and other...

10. ST v PS Ltd [2023] NZDT 65 (15 March 2023) [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...of this matter took place at 2pm today, however as PS Ltd did not answer calls made to the numbers provided for them, the hearing proceeded in their absence. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 15 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...